Sex and gender differences in caregiver burden among family caregivers of persons with dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.8
Thitinan Duangjina, Thanakrit Jeamjitvibool, Chang Park, Rebecca Raszewski, Valerie Gruss, Cynthia Fritschi
{"title":"Sex and gender differences in caregiver burden among family caregivers of persons with dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Thitinan Duangjina, Thanakrit Jeamjitvibool, Chang Park, Rebecca Raszewski, Valerie Gruss, Cynthia Fritschi","doi":"10.1016/j.archger.2025.105977","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis examined sex and gender differences in caregiver burden among family caregivers of persons with dementia and explored variations by region and country income level.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted in four databases (CINAHL, PubMed, EMBASE, and PsycINFO), including studies up to December 2024. Forty-seven studies representing 24 countries were included in the systematic review, with 39 studies (41 effect sizes) included in the meta-analysis. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled effect sizes (Cohen's d), and subgroup analyses were performed based on region and national income level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across the 47 studies, 14,919 family caregivers participated, of whom 70 % were women. Most family caregivers were either spouses (44 %) or adult children (43 %). Care recipients were predominantly diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease. Female caregivers reported significantly greater burden than males (Cohen's d= 0.21, 95 % CI: 0.13-0.29, p< 0.001). Subgroup analyses showed higher burden in Asian countries (d= 0.27) compared to Western countries (d= 0.19), though the difference was not statistically significant. High-income countries showed greater disparities (d= 0.21) than middle-income countries (d= 0.16), with no significant difference. High heterogeneity was observed among Western and high-income countries.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Female family caregivers experience a higher burden than male caregivers across regions and economic settings. Although regional and income-level subgroup differences were not statistically significant, findings underscore the role of cultural and structural contexts in shaping caregiver burden. Gender-sensitive, context specific interventions are essential to address these disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":93880,"journal":{"name":"Archives of gerontology and geriatrics","volume":"138 ","pages":"105977"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of gerontology and geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archger.2025.105977","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis examined sex and gender differences in caregiver burden among family caregivers of persons with dementia and explored variations by region and country income level.

Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted in four databases (CINAHL, PubMed, EMBASE, and PsycINFO), including studies up to December 2024. Forty-seven studies representing 24 countries were included in the systematic review, with 39 studies (41 effect sizes) included in the meta-analysis. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled effect sizes (Cohen's d), and subgroup analyses were performed based on region and national income level.

Results: Across the 47 studies, 14,919 family caregivers participated, of whom 70 % were women. Most family caregivers were either spouses (44 %) or adult children (43 %). Care recipients were predominantly diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease. Female caregivers reported significantly greater burden than males (Cohen's d= 0.21, 95 % CI: 0.13-0.29, p< 0.001). Subgroup analyses showed higher burden in Asian countries (d= 0.27) compared to Western countries (d= 0.19), though the difference was not statistically significant. High-income countries showed greater disparities (d= 0.21) than middle-income countries (d= 0.16), with no significant difference. High heterogeneity was observed among Western and high-income countries.

Conclusion: Female family caregivers experience a higher burden than male caregivers across regions and economic settings. Although regional and income-level subgroup differences were not statistically significant, findings underscore the role of cultural and structural contexts in shaping caregiver burden. Gender-sensitive, context specific interventions are essential to address these disparities.

痴呆症患者家庭照顾者照顾者负担的性别差异:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析
目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析考察了痴呆症患者家庭照顾者负担的性别差异,并探讨了不同地区和国家收入水平的差异。方法:按照PRISMA指南,在四个数据库(CINAHL、PubMed、EMBASE和PsycINFO)中进行全面的文献检索,包括截至2024年12月的研究。系统评价纳入了代表24个国家的47项研究,荟萃分析纳入了39项研究(41项效应量)。采用随机效应模型计算合并效应量(Cohen’s d),并根据地区和国家收入水平进行亚组分析。结果:在47项研究中,有14,919名家庭照顾者参与,其中70%是女性。大多数家庭照顾者是配偶(44%)或成年子女(43%)。接受护理的人主要被诊断患有阿尔茨海默病。女性照护者报告的负担明显大于男性(Cohen’s d= 0.21, 95% CI: 0.13-0.29, p< 0.001)。亚组分析显示,亚洲国家的负担(d= 0.27)高于西方国家(d= 0.19),但差异无统计学意义。高收入国家的差异(d= 0.21)大于中等收入国家(d= 0.16),但差异不显著。在西方国家和高收入国家之间观察到高度异质性。结论:在不同地区和经济背景下,女性家庭照顾者的负担高于男性家庭照顾者。虽然地区和收入水平的亚组差异在统计上并不显著,但研究结果强调了文化和结构背景在形成照顾者负担方面的作用。对性别问题敏感的、针对具体情况的干预措施对于解决这些差异至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信