Evidence-based medicine: 5 steps to navigate uncertainty

Rafael Martín-Masot , Carlos Ochoa Sangrador , Jaime Javier Cuervo Valdés , Carolina Blanco Rodríguez , Paz González Rodríguez , Javier González de Dios
{"title":"Evidence-based medicine: 5 steps to navigate uncertainty","authors":"Rafael Martín-Masot ,&nbsp;Carlos Ochoa Sangrador ,&nbsp;Jaime Javier Cuervo Valdés ,&nbsp;Carolina Blanco Rodríguez ,&nbsp;Paz González Rodríguez ,&nbsp;Javier González de Dios","doi":"10.1016/j.anpede.2025.503930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Evidence-based medicine provides a structured and practical approach for addressing the challenges of modern medicine, which is characterized by an overload of information and the need for well-founded clinical decision-making. This method consists of five steps: formulating clear structured clinical questions, conducting efficient literature searches, critically appraising the evidence, evaluating its applicability and, finally, integrating the resulting knowledge into clinical practice. The first step involves creating structured questions that address specific clinical needs, often using the widely known PICO framework developed by the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine in Oxford. Subsequently, to avoid information overload, it is essential to manage the abundance of data by prioritizing high-quality sources and adopting strategies that can yield quick and reliable answers. The core of evidence-based medicine lies in critical appraisal, whereby the validity, importance, and applicability of studies are assessed. This process helps avoid the mistake of accepting conclusions without questioning them. The final steps emphasize integrating evidence with clinical expertise and patient preferences, highlighting that, without proper implementation, evidence-based medicine can remain a theoretical framework without practical impact. In demanding clinical settings, evidence-based medicine aims to balance care quality, efficiency, and resource management, supporting professionals in making optimal, evidence-based decisions to improve health care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":93868,"journal":{"name":"Anales de pediatria","volume":"103 2","pages":"Article 503930"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anales de pediatria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2341287925002649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evidence-based medicine provides a structured and practical approach for addressing the challenges of modern medicine, which is characterized by an overload of information and the need for well-founded clinical decision-making. This method consists of five steps: formulating clear structured clinical questions, conducting efficient literature searches, critically appraising the evidence, evaluating its applicability and, finally, integrating the resulting knowledge into clinical practice. The first step involves creating structured questions that address specific clinical needs, often using the widely known PICO framework developed by the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine in Oxford. Subsequently, to avoid information overload, it is essential to manage the abundance of data by prioritizing high-quality sources and adopting strategies that can yield quick and reliable answers. The core of evidence-based medicine lies in critical appraisal, whereby the validity, importance, and applicability of studies are assessed. This process helps avoid the mistake of accepting conclusions without questioning them. The final steps emphasize integrating evidence with clinical expertise and patient preferences, highlighting that, without proper implementation, evidence-based medicine can remain a theoretical framework without practical impact. In demanding clinical settings, evidence-based medicine aims to balance care quality, efficiency, and resource management, supporting professionals in making optimal, evidence-based decisions to improve health care.
循证医学:驾驭不确定性的5个步骤。
循证医学为解决现代医学的挑战提供了一种结构化和实用的方法,现代医学的特点是信息过载,需要有充分根据的临床决策。该方法包括五个步骤:制定清晰结构化的临床问题,进行有效的文献检索,批判性地评估证据,评估其适用性,最后将所得知识整合到临床实践中。第一步涉及针对特定临床需求创建结构化问题,通常使用由牛津循证医学中心开发的广为人知的PICO框架。随后,为了避免信息过载,必须通过优先处理高质量来源和采用能够产生快速可靠答案的策略来管理大量数据。循证医学的核心在于批判性评价,即对研究的有效性、重要性和适用性进行评估。这个过程有助于避免不加质疑就接受结论的错误。最后的步骤强调将证据与临床专业知识和患者偏好相结合,强调如果没有适当的实施,循证医学可能仍然是一个没有实际影响的理论框架。在要求苛刻的临床环境中,循证医学旨在平衡护理质量、效率和资源管理,支持专业人员做出最佳的循证决策,以改善卫生保健。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信