Patient- and Caregiver-Identified Goals for Advance Care Planning in Patients With Dementia or Cognitive Impairment.

IF 2.2
Kristin L Rising, Angela M Gerolamo, Nazanin Sarpoulaki, Venise J Salcedo, Grace Amadio, Robin Casten, Anna Marie Chang, Alexzandra T Gentsch, C Virginia O'Hayer, Barry Rovner, Brooke Worster
{"title":"Patient- and Caregiver-Identified Goals for Advance Care Planning in Patients With Dementia or Cognitive Impairment.","authors":"Kristin L Rising, Angela M Gerolamo, Nazanin Sarpoulaki, Venise J Salcedo, Grace Amadio, Robin Casten, Anna Marie Chang, Alexzandra T Gentsch, C Virginia O'Hayer, Barry Rovner, Brooke Worster","doi":"10.1177/14713012251361969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite an aging population and acknowledged importance of advance care planning (ACP) for persons living with cognitive impairment, few engage in ACP. Most existing tools to facilitate ACP discussions focus on medical outcomes, despite research documenting that persons with cognitive impairment often have quality of life outcomes as primary goals. A tool for ACP that incorporates a range of outcomes that are most important to persons with cognitive impairment and their carers is needed. This qualitative study engaged persons with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia and their carers to identify outcomes that are most important to inform development of a tool to guide ACP interventions with this population. We conducted interviews with 17 persons with MCI or dementia and 15 caregivers of persons with MCI or dementia. Interviews explored participants' prior experiences with ACP and goals for care planning. Content analysis was used to generate a list of outcomes identified as most important to persons with MCI or dementia and their carers. The list of person-centered outcomes was refined/categorized by research team consensus. Most participants in the sample had not participated in a prior ACP conversation with a primary care provider. Participants identified 23 outcome categories for ACP interventions within the following six domains: social life, family involvement, current lifestyle, physical independence, financial independence and healthcare goals. Of the 23 outcome categories, the majority (86%) were quality of life goals and only a small fraction (14%) were healthcare specific. The outcomes identified as most important to persons with MCI or dementia and their caregivers can be used as a foundation for future work focused on developing an ACP tool to guide shared decision-making about healthcare. This tool can facilitate prioritization of goals that are most meaningful to persons with cognitive impairment and their carers as opposed to focusing only on medical aspects of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":72778,"journal":{"name":"Dementia (London, England)","volume":" ","pages":"14713012251361969"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dementia (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14713012251361969","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite an aging population and acknowledged importance of advance care planning (ACP) for persons living with cognitive impairment, few engage in ACP. Most existing tools to facilitate ACP discussions focus on medical outcomes, despite research documenting that persons with cognitive impairment often have quality of life outcomes as primary goals. A tool for ACP that incorporates a range of outcomes that are most important to persons with cognitive impairment and their carers is needed. This qualitative study engaged persons with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia and their carers to identify outcomes that are most important to inform development of a tool to guide ACP interventions with this population. We conducted interviews with 17 persons with MCI or dementia and 15 caregivers of persons with MCI or dementia. Interviews explored participants' prior experiences with ACP and goals for care planning. Content analysis was used to generate a list of outcomes identified as most important to persons with MCI or dementia and their carers. The list of person-centered outcomes was refined/categorized by research team consensus. Most participants in the sample had not participated in a prior ACP conversation with a primary care provider. Participants identified 23 outcome categories for ACP interventions within the following six domains: social life, family involvement, current lifestyle, physical independence, financial independence and healthcare goals. Of the 23 outcome categories, the majority (86%) were quality of life goals and only a small fraction (14%) were healthcare specific. The outcomes identified as most important to persons with MCI or dementia and their caregivers can be used as a foundation for future work focused on developing an ACP tool to guide shared decision-making about healthcare. This tool can facilitate prioritization of goals that are most meaningful to persons with cognitive impairment and their carers as opposed to focusing only on medical aspects of care.

痴呆症或认知障碍患者预先护理计划的患者和护理人员确定的目标。
尽管人口老龄化和公认的重要性,提前护理计划(ACP)的人生活的认知障碍,很少从事ACP。大多数促进ACP讨论的现有工具都侧重于医疗结果,尽管研究记录表明,认知障碍患者通常以生活质量结果为主要目标。需要一种纳入对认知障碍患者及其护理人员最重要的一系列结果的ACP工具。这项定性研究让轻度认知障碍(MCI)或痴呆患者及其护理人员参与,以确定最重要的结果,为开发一种工具提供信息,以指导针对这一人群的ACP干预措施。我们采访了17名轻度认知障碍患者或痴呆症患者以及15名轻度认知障碍患者或痴呆症患者的护理人员。访谈探讨了参与者先前的ACP经验和护理计划的目标。内容分析用于生成对轻度认知障碍患者或痴呆症患者及其护理人员最重要的结果列表。以人为中心的结果列表根据研究团队的共识进行了细化/分类。样本中的大多数参与者没有参加过与初级保健提供者的ACP对话。与会者在以下六个领域确定了ACP干预措施的23个成果类别:社会生活、家庭参与、目前的生活方式、身体独立、经济独立和保健目标。在23个结果类别中,大多数(86%)是生活质量目标,只有一小部分(14%)是特定于医疗保健的。对轻度认知障碍患者或痴呆症患者及其护理人员最重要的结果可以作为未来工作的基础,重点是开发ACP工具,以指导有关医疗保健的共同决策。这一工具有助于确定对认知障碍患者及其护理人员最有意义的目标的优先次序,而不是只关注护理的医疗方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信