More than an Acquaintance Less than a Friend: Fringeships in Everyday Life.

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Karen L Fingerman, Kira S Birditt, Katherine Fiori, Jeffrey Hall, Oliver Huxhold, Amy Rauer, Gillian Sandstrom, Susan Sprecher
{"title":"More than an Acquaintance Less than a Friend: Fringeships in Everyday Life.","authors":"Karen L Fingerman, Kira S Birditt, Katherine Fiori, Jeffrey Hall, Oliver Huxhold, Amy Rauer, Gillian Sandstrom, Susan Sprecher","doi":"10.1177/10892680251357549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Loneliness is a pressing global health crisis. A combination of close and not close ties (i.e., weak ties) is optimal to combat loneliness and improve psychological and physical health. The literature has not differentiated among weak ties, however. We identify possible categories of weak ties along a spectrum from passing strangers to the edge of friendship. We propose that one type of weak tie, which we term \"fringeships,\" may provide unique benefits for well-being compared to other weak ties. Fringeships sit on the edge of close ties and are characterized by: a) regular contact in specific settings; b) volitional and mutual recognition of the connection; c) freedom from obligations that characterize close ties or formalities that characterize many types of weak ties; and d) a degree of shared affection and fondness. Fringeships engage in a balance of small talk and personal disclosure. We speculate on the potential benefits of fringeships, the contexts in which they are likely to arise, and individual differences in the propensity to develop them. We discuss potential interventions for the development of fringeships, particularly for those most in need of social contact. We conclude with research questions to launch this Next Big Idea.</p>","PeriodicalId":48306,"journal":{"name":"Review of General Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12330783/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of General Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10892680251357549","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Loneliness is a pressing global health crisis. A combination of close and not close ties (i.e., weak ties) is optimal to combat loneliness and improve psychological and physical health. The literature has not differentiated among weak ties, however. We identify possible categories of weak ties along a spectrum from passing strangers to the edge of friendship. We propose that one type of weak tie, which we term "fringeships," may provide unique benefits for well-being compared to other weak ties. Fringeships sit on the edge of close ties and are characterized by: a) regular contact in specific settings; b) volitional and mutual recognition of the connection; c) freedom from obligations that characterize close ties or formalities that characterize many types of weak ties; and d) a degree of shared affection and fondness. Fringeships engage in a balance of small talk and personal disclosure. We speculate on the potential benefits of fringeships, the contexts in which they are likely to arise, and individual differences in the propensity to develop them. We discuss potential interventions for the development of fringeships, particularly for those most in need of social contact. We conclude with research questions to launch this Next Big Idea.

比熟人多,比朋友少:日常生活中的朋友关系。
孤独是一个紧迫的全球健康危机。亲密关系和不亲密关系(即弱关系)的结合是对抗孤独和改善心理和身体健康的最佳选择。然而,文献并没有区分弱联系。我们根据从陌生人到友谊边缘的范围来确定弱关系的可能类别。我们提出一种弱关系,我们称之为“边缘关系”,与其他弱关系相比,它可能为幸福感提供独特的好处。边缘关系处于亲密关系的边缘,其特点是:a)在特定场合经常接触;B)自愿和相互承认的联系;C)免于以亲密关系为特征的义务或以许多类型的弱关系为特征的手续;d)某种程度的共同感情和喜爱。亲密关系需要在闲聊和个人表露之间取得平衡。我们推测了亲密关系的潜在好处,它们可能产生的环境,以及发展它们的倾向的个体差异。我们讨论了潜在的干预措施的发展,特别是对那些最需要社会接触。我们以研究问题结束,以推出“下一个大创意”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Review of General Psychology
Review of General Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
4.80%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Review of General Psychology seeks to publish innovative theoretical, conceptual, or methodological articles that cross-cut the traditional subdisciplines of psychology. The journal contains articles that advance theory, evaluate and integrate research literatures, provide a new historical analysis, or discuss new methodological developments in psychology as a whole. Review of General Psychology is especially interested in articles that bridge gaps between subdisciplines in psychology as well as related fields or that focus on topics that transcend traditional subdisciplinary boundaries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信