Can unvaccinated children be reached through mobile phones? Analyses of national cross-sectional surveys from 70 countries.

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Francine S Costa, Thiago M Santos, Larissa An Silva, Tewodaj Mengistu, Taylor A Holroyd, Daniel R Hogan, Aluisio Jd Barros, Cesar G Victora
{"title":"Can unvaccinated children be reached through mobile phones? Analyses of national cross-sectional surveys from 70 countries.","authors":"Francine S Costa, Thiago M Santos, Larissa An Silva, Tewodaj Mengistu, Taylor A Holroyd, Daniel R Hogan, Aluisio Jd Barros, Cesar G Victora","doi":"10.7189/jogh.15.04232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Interventions using mobile phones, otherwise known as mHealth interventions, are increasingly being used in low- and middle-income countries to remind families about scheduled child immunisations. Despite this, few studies examined impact on zero-dose children - those who failed to receive a single dose of a routine vaccine. As disparities in mobile phone ownership may limit the effectiveness of mHealth interventions, we assessed associations between mobile phone ownership, gender, wealth, residence, and zero-dose and modelled their potential impact for reaching unvaccinated children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed 70 nationally representative surveys with data on immunisations and mobile phone ownership by households and mothers, and correlated ownership with household wealth and place of residence. We performed analyses at the individual child level and pooled across all countries weighted by national populations. We modelled the mHealth interventions' potential impact on zero-dose prevalence by estimating how many unvaccinated children are reachable via mobile phones.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The surveys included 163 527 children aged 12-23 months, with 13.4% being zero-dose. Among them, 34% of mothers and 73% of households had a mobile phone, compared to 60% and 89% for vaccinated children. Mobile phone ownership by mothers ranged from 32% in the poorest to 86% in the wealthiest quintile. A hypothetical 100% effective intervention using household mobile phones would reduce zero-dose prevalence from 13% to 4%, while one using similar effectiveness assumptions for mothers' phones would reduce national prevalence to 10%. Interventions with effectiveness ranging from 10% to 50% would lead to smaller impact levels. The largest impact is expected in countries like Guinea and Cote d'Ivoire, where both zero-dose prevalence and mobile phone ownership are high.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The potential impact of mHealth interventions for reaching zero-dose children may be limited by mobile phone ownership among mothers and families, particularly among the poor, where we find the greatest number of unvaccinated children.</p>","PeriodicalId":48734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Health","volume":"15 ","pages":"04232"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12336926/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.15.04232","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Interventions using mobile phones, otherwise known as mHealth interventions, are increasingly being used in low- and middle-income countries to remind families about scheduled child immunisations. Despite this, few studies examined impact on zero-dose children - those who failed to receive a single dose of a routine vaccine. As disparities in mobile phone ownership may limit the effectiveness of mHealth interventions, we assessed associations between mobile phone ownership, gender, wealth, residence, and zero-dose and modelled their potential impact for reaching unvaccinated children.

Methods: We analysed 70 nationally representative surveys with data on immunisations and mobile phone ownership by households and mothers, and correlated ownership with household wealth and place of residence. We performed analyses at the individual child level and pooled across all countries weighted by national populations. We modelled the mHealth interventions' potential impact on zero-dose prevalence by estimating how many unvaccinated children are reachable via mobile phones.

Results: The surveys included 163 527 children aged 12-23 months, with 13.4% being zero-dose. Among them, 34% of mothers and 73% of households had a mobile phone, compared to 60% and 89% for vaccinated children. Mobile phone ownership by mothers ranged from 32% in the poorest to 86% in the wealthiest quintile. A hypothetical 100% effective intervention using household mobile phones would reduce zero-dose prevalence from 13% to 4%, while one using similar effectiveness assumptions for mothers' phones would reduce national prevalence to 10%. Interventions with effectiveness ranging from 10% to 50% would lead to smaller impact levels. The largest impact is expected in countries like Guinea and Cote d'Ivoire, where both zero-dose prevalence and mobile phone ownership are high.

Conclusions: The potential impact of mHealth interventions for reaching zero-dose children may be limited by mobile phone ownership among mothers and families, particularly among the poor, where we find the greatest number of unvaccinated children.

未接种疫苗的儿童能否通过手机接触到?对来自70个国家的全国性横断面调查的分析。
背景:低收入和中等收入国家越来越多地使用使用移动电话的干预措施,或称为移动健康干预措施,提醒家庭注意预定的儿童免疫接种。尽管如此,很少有研究检查对零剂量儿童的影响,即那些未能接种单剂量常规疫苗的儿童。由于手机拥有率的差异可能会限制移动健康干预措施的有效性,我们评估了手机拥有率、性别、财富、居住地和零剂量之间的关联,并模拟了它们对未接种疫苗儿童的潜在影响。方法:我们分析了70项具有全国代表性的调查,其中包括家庭和母亲的免疫接种和手机拥有率数据,并将拥有率与家庭财富和居住地相关联。我们在儿童个体水平上进行了分析,并将所有国家按国家人口加权进行了汇总。我们通过估计有多少未接种疫苗的儿童可以通过手机接触到,模拟了移动健康干预措施对零剂量流行的潜在影响。结果:调查对象为163 527名12-23月龄儿童,其中13.4%为零剂量。其中,34%的母亲和73%的家庭拥有手机,而接种疫苗的儿童拥有手机的比例分别为60%和89%。母亲的手机拥有率从最贫穷的32%到最富有的五分之一的86%不等。假设使用家用移动电话进行100%有效干预,将把零剂量流行率从13%降低到4%,而对母亲使用手机进行类似的有效性假设,将把全国流行率降低到10%。如果干预措施的有效性在10%到50%之间,影响程度就会小一些。预计影响最大的是几内亚和科特迪瓦等国家,这些国家的零剂量流行率和手机拥有率都很高。结论:移动健康干预措施对接触零剂量儿童的潜在影响可能受到母亲和家庭中手机拥有率的限制,特别是在穷人中,我们发现穷人中未接种疫苗的儿童人数最多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Global Health
Journal of Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
240
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Global Health is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Edinburgh University Global Health Society, a not-for-profit organization registered in the UK. We publish editorials, news, viewpoints, original research and review articles in two issues per year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信