Trends in Dual Mobility Cup Use and Outcomes in Primary and Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A Nationwide Database Study.

IF 2 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-15 DOI:10.4055/cios24457
Seok Ha Hong, Kyun Ho Shin, Seung Beom Han
{"title":"Trends in Dual Mobility Cup Use and Outcomes in Primary and Revision Hip Arthroplasty: A Nationwide Database Study.","authors":"Seok Ha Hong, Kyun Ho Shin, Seung Beom Han","doi":"10.4055/cios24457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dual mobility cups (DMCs) have emerged as a promising option for enhancing hip stability in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). In this study, we aimed to determine the trends in DMC utilization, compare the outcomes of DMCs with those of conventional cups in primary THA, and assess DMC outcomes in revision THA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected data on all primary and revision THAs performed from 2015 to 2022 based on procedure codes from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment database. Revision THAs included both stem-and-cup revisions and cup-only revisions. Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted to identify the baseline characteristics influencing DMC usage. Propensity score matching was applied to compare periprosthetic complications (dislocation, periprosthetic fracture, periprosthetic joint infection, and revision) between patients receiving DMCs and those receiving conventional cups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 70,760 primary THAs, 7,670 utilized DMCs, whereas 751 of 3,595 revision THAs adopted DMCs, reflecting an increasing trend up to 25.8% and 28.7% in 2022, respectively. In primary THA, DMC use increased significantly in patients aged 60 years and older, with univariate analysis indicating an increased use in patients with previous lumbar spine fusion, heart failure, diabetes, stroke, and hemiplegia. However, after adjusting for age, only age remained significant, with a 3% increase in the likelihood of DMC use in primary THA per year. Additionally, both DMC and conventional cups showed an age-related increase in dislocation rates, although the overall dislocation rate remained significantly lower in the DMC group compared to the conventional cups. Remarkably, 37.3% of cup revisions were performed using DMC. The Kaplan-Meier curve revealed a 3-year survival rate of 94.6% for re-revision in revision THAs using DMCs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DMC use increased with age and was used in up to 26% of primary THAs and 29% of revision THAs by 2022. In primary THA, DMC significantly reduced dislocation rates compared to conventional cups without increasing other periprosthetic or medical complications. DMCs also showed favorable outcomes in revision THAs, supporting their broader utilization in both primary and revision THAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47648,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery","volume":"17 4","pages":"588-598"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12328116/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4055/cios24457","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dual mobility cups (DMCs) have emerged as a promising option for enhancing hip stability in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). In this study, we aimed to determine the trends in DMC utilization, compare the outcomes of DMCs with those of conventional cups in primary THA, and assess DMC outcomes in revision THA.

Methods: We collected data on all primary and revision THAs performed from 2015 to 2022 based on procedure codes from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment database. Revision THAs included both stem-and-cup revisions and cup-only revisions. Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted to identify the baseline characteristics influencing DMC usage. Propensity score matching was applied to compare periprosthetic complications (dislocation, periprosthetic fracture, periprosthetic joint infection, and revision) between patients receiving DMCs and those receiving conventional cups.

Results: Among 70,760 primary THAs, 7,670 utilized DMCs, whereas 751 of 3,595 revision THAs adopted DMCs, reflecting an increasing trend up to 25.8% and 28.7% in 2022, respectively. In primary THA, DMC use increased significantly in patients aged 60 years and older, with univariate analysis indicating an increased use in patients with previous lumbar spine fusion, heart failure, diabetes, stroke, and hemiplegia. However, after adjusting for age, only age remained significant, with a 3% increase in the likelihood of DMC use in primary THA per year. Additionally, both DMC and conventional cups showed an age-related increase in dislocation rates, although the overall dislocation rate remained significantly lower in the DMC group compared to the conventional cups. Remarkably, 37.3% of cup revisions were performed using DMC. The Kaplan-Meier curve revealed a 3-year survival rate of 94.6% for re-revision in revision THAs using DMCs.

Conclusions: DMC use increased with age and was used in up to 26% of primary THAs and 29% of revision THAs by 2022. In primary THA, DMC significantly reduced dislocation rates compared to conventional cups without increasing other periprosthetic or medical complications. DMCs also showed favorable outcomes in revision THAs, supporting their broader utilization in both primary and revision THAs.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

初次和翻修髋关节置换术中双活动杯的使用趋势和结果:一项全国数据库研究。
背景:双活动杯(DMCs)已成为在初次和翻修全髋关节置换术(THA)中增强髋关节稳定性的一种有希望的选择。在本研究中,我们旨在确定DMC使用的趋势,比较DMC与常规杯在初级THA中的结果,并评估DMC在改良THA中的结果。方法:我们根据韩国健康保险审查和评估数据库的程序代码收集2015年至2022年进行的所有初级和修订tha的数据。修订THAs包括茎和杯子的修订和杯子的修订。进行单变量和多变量分析,以确定影响DMC使用的基线特征。采用倾向评分匹配法比较dmc和常规杯组患者假体周围并发症(脱位、假体周围骨折、假体周围关节感染和翻修)。结果:在70760个初级THAs中,7670个使用dmc,而在3595个修订THAs中,751个使用dmc,在2022年分别上升到25.8%和28.7%。在原发性全髋关节置换术中,60岁及以上患者DMC的使用显著增加,单因素分析表明,有腰椎融合、心力衰竭、糖尿病、中风和偏瘫病史的患者DMC的使用增加。然而,在调整年龄后,只有年龄仍然显著,DMC在原发性THA中使用的可能性每年增加3%。此外,DMC和传统杯子均显示出与年龄相关的脱位率增加,尽管与传统杯子相比,DMC组的总体脱位率仍显着降低。值得注意的是,37.3%的杯形矫正使用DMC。Kaplan-Meier曲线显示,使用dmc重新修订tha的3年生存率为94.6%。结论:DMC的使用随着年龄的增长而增加,到2022年,DMC在26%的原发性THAs和29%的改良THAs中使用。在原发性THA中,与传统的假体杯相比,DMC显著降低了脱位率,而不会增加其他假体周围或医疗并发症。dmc在改良tha中也显示出良好的结果,支持其在原发性和改良tha中的广泛应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信