Differences in Clinical Outcomes and Rotational Stability Between Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction and Lemaire Lateral Tenodesis Following Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

IF 1.8 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Hamidreza Yazdi, Ali Torkaman, Amir Mohsen Khorrami, Moein Ghaeini, Arman Fakhrian, Seyed Arman Moein, Seyyed Hamidreza Ayatizadeh, Nariman Latifi
{"title":"Differences in Clinical Outcomes and Rotational Stability Between Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction and Lemaire Lateral Tenodesis Following Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.","authors":"Hamidreza Yazdi, Ali Torkaman, Amir Mohsen Khorrami, Moein Ghaeini, Arman Fakhrian, Seyed Arman Moein, Seyyed Hamidreza Ayatizadeh, Nariman Latifi","doi":"10.22038/ABJS.2025.84170.3826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Residual instability following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a common concern among young, active patients. Currently, two primary methods are used to address this matter: anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) using a graft and lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET). This study aims to compare the Lemaire method for LET with ALLR in minimizing rotational instability after ACLR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included patients with ACL ruptures who underwent simultaneous arthroscopic ACLR and either Lemaire lateral tenodesis or ALL reconstruction between April 2013 and March 2021. Patients were re-examined approximately 24 months post-operatively. We evaluated rotational instability using the pivot shift test, and anterior stability with the KT-1000 test. Outcomes were measured using the Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study evaluated 53 patients who underwent ACLR using either the Lemaire method for LET (n=24) or ALLR technique (n=29). No substantial differences were observed in terms of age, sex, body mass index (BMI), number of physiotherapy sessions, time from injury to surgery, or the diameter of the ACL graft. Rotational stability was significantly better in the Lemaire group (16.7% vs. 82.8%, P < 0.001). Although functional outcomes were higher in the Lemaire group, these differences were not statistically significant. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the surgical technique was the only significant predictor of rotational instability, with patients undergoing ALLR being 18.8 times more likely to experience a positive pivot shift (OR: 18.78, 95% CI: 4.34-81.18, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This retrospective cohort study suggests that Lemaire LET may be more effective than ALLR in minimizing rotational instability following arthroscopic ACLR. However, there was no superiority in functional scores between the groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":46704,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS","volume":"13 7","pages":"426-434"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12335192/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/ABJS.2025.84170.3826","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Residual instability following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a common concern among young, active patients. Currently, two primary methods are used to address this matter: anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) using a graft and lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET). This study aims to compare the Lemaire method for LET with ALLR in minimizing rotational instability after ACLR.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients with ACL ruptures who underwent simultaneous arthroscopic ACLR and either Lemaire lateral tenodesis or ALL reconstruction between April 2013 and March 2021. Patients were re-examined approximately 24 months post-operatively. We evaluated rotational instability using the pivot shift test, and anterior stability with the KT-1000 test. Outcomes were measured using the Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) questionnaires.

Results: This study evaluated 53 patients who underwent ACLR using either the Lemaire method for LET (n=24) or ALLR technique (n=29). No substantial differences were observed in terms of age, sex, body mass index (BMI), number of physiotherapy sessions, time from injury to surgery, or the diameter of the ACL graft. Rotational stability was significantly better in the Lemaire group (16.7% vs. 82.8%, P < 0.001). Although functional outcomes were higher in the Lemaire group, these differences were not statistically significant. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the surgical technique was the only significant predictor of rotational instability, with patients undergoing ALLR being 18.8 times more likely to experience a positive pivot shift (OR: 18.78, 95% CI: 4.34-81.18, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: This retrospective cohort study suggests that Lemaire LET may be more effective than ALLR in minimizing rotational instability following arthroscopic ACLR. However, there was no superiority in functional scores between the groups.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

原发性前交叉韧带重建后前外侧韧带重建与Lemaire外侧肌腱固定术的临床疗效和旋转稳定性差异。
目的:前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)后的残余不稳定是年轻、活跃患者普遍关注的问题。目前,有两种主要的方法用于解决这个问题:前外侧韧带重建(ALLR)和外侧关节外肌腱固定术(LET)。本研究旨在比较Lemaire方法与ALLR在最小化ACLR后旋转不稳定性方面的差异。方法:这项回顾性队列研究纳入了2013年4月至2021年3月期间同时接受关节镜下ACLR和Lemaire外侧肌腱固定术或ALL重建的ACL断裂患者。术后约24个月对患者进行复查。我们用枢轴移位试验评估旋转不稳定性,用KT-1000试验评估前路稳定性。结果采用Lysholm和国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)问卷进行测量。结果:本研究评估了53例采用Lemaire方法(n=24)或ALLR技术(n=29)行ACLR的患者。在年龄、性别、身体质量指数(BMI)、物理治疗次数、从受伤到手术的时间或ACL移植物直径方面没有观察到实质性差异。Lemaire组旋转稳定性明显更好(16.7%比82.8%,P < 0.001)。虽然Lemaire组的功能结果更高,但这些差异没有统计学意义。多因素logistic回归分析显示,手术技术是旋转不稳定的唯一显著预测因素,ALLR患者发生正枢轴移位的可能性是其18.8倍(OR: 18.78, 95% CI: 4.34-81.18, P < 0.001)。结论:这项回顾性队列研究表明,Lemaire LET可能比ALLR更有效地减少关节镜下ACLR后的旋转不稳定性。然而,两组之间在功能评分上没有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
期刊介绍: The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery (ABJS) aims to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of Orthopedic Sciences. The journal accepts scientific papers including original research, review article, short communication, case report, and letter to the editor in all fields of bone, joint, musculoskeletal surgery and related researches. The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery (ABJS) will publish papers in all aspects of today`s modern orthopedic sciences including: Arthroscopy, Arthroplasty, Sport Medicine, Reconstruction, Hand and Upper Extremity, Pediatric Orthopedics, Spine, Trauma, Foot and Ankle, Tumor, Joint Rheumatic Disease, Skeletal Imaging, Orthopedic Physical Therapy, Rehabilitation, Orthopedic Basic Sciences (Biomechanics, Biotechnology, Biomaterial..).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信