Can Artificial Intelligence Reliably and Accurately Measure Lower Limb Alignment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.8 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Yashar Khani, Amir Bisadi, Ali Salmani, Negarsadat Namazi, Iman Elahi Vahed, Joben Kianparsa, Mohammad Nouroozi, Fateme Mansouri Rad, Mohammad Poursalehian
{"title":"Can Artificial Intelligence Reliably and Accurately Measure Lower Limb Alignment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Yashar Khani, Amir Bisadi, Ali Salmani, Negarsadat Namazi, Iman Elahi Vahed, Joben Kianparsa, Mohammad Nouroozi, Fateme Mansouri Rad, Mohammad Poursalehian","doi":"10.22038/ABJS.2025.84846.3864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Lower limb alignment (LLA) measurements are vital for pre-operative assessments and surgical planning in orthopedics. Artificial intelligence (AI) can enhance the precision and consistency of these measurements. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the accuracy and reliability of AI-based approaches in detecting anatomical landmarks and measuring LLA angles, highlighting both their strengths and limitations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science on July 2024 and included observational studies validating AI-driven LLA measurements. Pooled intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were computed to assess inter-rater reliability between AI and manual measurements. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool was used to assess study quality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We reviewed 28 studies with 47,200 patients and 61,253 images; AI demonstrated high reliability in measuring 15 lower limb angles, with pooled ICCs ranging from 0.9811 to 1.0597. Angles like the hip-knee-ankle (HKA; ICC = 0.9987, 95% CI: 0.9975-0.9998) and the mechanical tibiofemoral angle (mTFA; ICC = 1.0001, 95% CI: 1.0001-1.0001) showed near-perfect agreement. In contrast, the joint line convergence angle (JLCA) and femoral anatomical-mechanical angle (FAMA) exhibited lower reliability and significant publication bias. Heterogeneity was substantial across most angles (I² = 63%-100%). These findings highlight the potential of AI for clinical applications while also identifying areas that require refinement and standardization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AI exhibits high reliability and accuracy in measuring key LLA angles, often outperforming manual techniques in both speed and consistency. It holds significant promise as a clinical tool, though challenges with less reliable angles warrant further refinement. Future studies should focus on standardizing landmark definitions and addressing implementation barriers to maximize AI's potential in orthopedic practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":46704,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS","volume":"13 7","pages":"383-394"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12335197/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery-ABJS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/ABJS.2025.84846.3864","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Lower limb alignment (LLA) measurements are vital for pre-operative assessments and surgical planning in orthopedics. Artificial intelligence (AI) can enhance the precision and consistency of these measurements. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the accuracy and reliability of AI-based approaches in detecting anatomical landmarks and measuring LLA angles, highlighting both their strengths and limitations.

Methods: Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, we searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science on July 2024 and included observational studies validating AI-driven LLA measurements. Pooled intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were computed to assess inter-rater reliability between AI and manual measurements. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool was used to assess study quality.

Results: We reviewed 28 studies with 47,200 patients and 61,253 images; AI demonstrated high reliability in measuring 15 lower limb angles, with pooled ICCs ranging from 0.9811 to 1.0597. Angles like the hip-knee-ankle (HKA; ICC = 0.9987, 95% CI: 0.9975-0.9998) and the mechanical tibiofemoral angle (mTFA; ICC = 1.0001, 95% CI: 1.0001-1.0001) showed near-perfect agreement. In contrast, the joint line convergence angle (JLCA) and femoral anatomical-mechanical angle (FAMA) exhibited lower reliability and significant publication bias. Heterogeneity was substantial across most angles (I² = 63%-100%). These findings highlight the potential of AI for clinical applications while also identifying areas that require refinement and standardization.

Conclusion: AI exhibits high reliability and accuracy in measuring key LLA angles, often outperforming manual techniques in both speed and consistency. It holds significant promise as a clinical tool, though challenges with less reliable angles warrant further refinement. Future studies should focus on standardizing landmark definitions and addressing implementation barriers to maximize AI's potential in orthopedic practice.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

人工智能能否可靠、准确地测量下肢直线:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
目的:下肢直线(LLA)测量是骨科术前评估和手术计划的重要依据。人工智能(AI)可以提高这些测量的精度和一致性。本系统综述和荟萃分析评估了基于人工智能的方法在检测解剖标志和测量LLA角度方面的准确性和可靠性,突出了它们的优势和局限性。方法:遵循PRISMA指南,我们于2024年7月检索PubMed、Scopus、Embase和Web of Science,并纳入验证ai驱动LLA测量的观察性研究。计算汇总类内相关系数(ICCs)来评估人工智能和人工测量之间的类间可靠性。使用诊断准确性研究质量评估(QUADAS-2)工具评估研究质量。结果:我们回顾了28项研究,47,200例患者和61,253张图像;人工智能对15个下肢角度的测量具有较高的可靠性,汇总icc范围为0.9811 ~ 1.0597。髋关节-膝关节-踝关节(HKA;ICC = 0.9987, 95% CI: 0.9975-0.9998)和机械胫股角(mTFA;ICC = 1.0001, 95% CI: 1.0001-1.0001)显示了近乎完美的一致。相比之下,关节线收敛角(JLCA)和股骨解剖-力学角(FAMA)的可靠性较低,发表偏倚显著。异质性在大多数角度都很明显(I²= 63%-100%)。这些发现突出了人工智能在临床应用中的潜力,同时也确定了需要改进和标准化的领域。结论:人工智能在测量关键LLA角度方面具有很高的可靠性和准确性,在速度和一致性方面往往优于人工技术。虽然角度不太可靠的挑战需要进一步改进,但它作为临床工具具有重要的前景。未来的研究应侧重于标准化具有里程碑意义的定义和解决实施障碍,以最大限度地发挥人工智能在骨科实践中的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
期刊介绍: The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery (ABJS) aims to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of Orthopedic Sciences. The journal accepts scientific papers including original research, review article, short communication, case report, and letter to the editor in all fields of bone, joint, musculoskeletal surgery and related researches. The Archives of Bone and Joint Surgery (ABJS) will publish papers in all aspects of today`s modern orthopedic sciences including: Arthroscopy, Arthroplasty, Sport Medicine, Reconstruction, Hand and Upper Extremity, Pediatric Orthopedics, Spine, Trauma, Foot and Ankle, Tumor, Joint Rheumatic Disease, Skeletal Imaging, Orthopedic Physical Therapy, Rehabilitation, Orthopedic Basic Sciences (Biomechanics, Biotechnology, Biomaterial..).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信