{"title":"Comparison of Single-port Robotic Surgery Using the Da Vinci SP Surgical System and Single-port Laparoscopic Surgery for Benign Indications.","authors":"Hironori Miyamura, Yusuke Mizuno, Akiko Ohwaki, Mayuko Ito, Eiji Nishio, Haruki Nishizawa","doi":"10.4103/gmit.GMIT-D-24-00048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Robot-assisted surgery has become popular in Japan, especially with the introduction of the da Vinci SP<sup>®</sup> surgical system, which is a significant advancement in minimally invasive surgery. The da Vinci SP<sup>®</sup> surgical system, which enables single-port surgery, has recently been developed. This study aims to compare the surgical outcomes of conventional single-port laparoscopic surgery and single-port robotic surgery using the da Vinci SP surgical system.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We included 23 patients who underwent single-port robot-assisted total hysterectomy (SP-RAH) for uterine fibroids and 33 patients who underwent conventional single-port total laparoscopic hysterectomy (SP-TLH). Surgical outcomes from the 1<sup>st</sup> year after the introduction of the da Vinci SP<sup>®</sup> system were compared between the two techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Surgical outcomes showed the following differences between the SP-RAH and SP-TLH groups: Weights of the resected uterus: 217 (90-500) g versus 256 (100-436) g (<i>P</i> = 0.06); intraoperative blood loss: 12 (4-147) mL versus 80 (10-780) mL (<i>P</i> < 0.01); total surgery duration: 199 (131-251) min versus 239 (110-282) min (<i>P</i> < 0.03); pneumoperitoneal surgery duration: 146 (90-221) min versus 186 (110-282) min (<i>P</i> = 0.03). SP-RAH showed significantly less blood loss and shorter operative durations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The da Vinci SP system allows the safe introduction of single-port total hysterectomy and improves surgical outcomes in the early stages compared to conventional single-port laparoscopy. Future studies may expand its use to improve wound alignment and reduce patient burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":45272,"journal":{"name":"Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy-GMIT","volume":"14 3","pages":"229-233"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12334096/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy-GMIT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/gmit.GMIT-D-24-00048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Robot-assisted surgery has become popular in Japan, especially with the introduction of the da Vinci SP® surgical system, which is a significant advancement in minimally invasive surgery. The da Vinci SP® surgical system, which enables single-port surgery, has recently been developed. This study aims to compare the surgical outcomes of conventional single-port laparoscopic surgery and single-port robotic surgery using the da Vinci SP surgical system.
Materials and methods: We included 23 patients who underwent single-port robot-assisted total hysterectomy (SP-RAH) for uterine fibroids and 33 patients who underwent conventional single-port total laparoscopic hysterectomy (SP-TLH). Surgical outcomes from the 1st year after the introduction of the da Vinci SP® system were compared between the two techniques.
Results: Surgical outcomes showed the following differences between the SP-RAH and SP-TLH groups: Weights of the resected uterus: 217 (90-500) g versus 256 (100-436) g (P = 0.06); intraoperative blood loss: 12 (4-147) mL versus 80 (10-780) mL (P < 0.01); total surgery duration: 199 (131-251) min versus 239 (110-282) min (P < 0.03); pneumoperitoneal surgery duration: 146 (90-221) min versus 186 (110-282) min (P = 0.03). SP-RAH showed significantly less blood loss and shorter operative durations.
Conclusion: The da Vinci SP system allows the safe introduction of single-port total hysterectomy and improves surgical outcomes in the early stages compared to conventional single-port laparoscopy. Future studies may expand its use to improve wound alignment and reduce patient burden.
机器人辅助手术在日本已经很流行,特别是随着达芬奇SP®手术系统的引入,这是微创手术的重大进步。达芬奇SP®手术系统,可以实现单端口手术,最近被开发出来。本研究旨在比较传统单孔腹腔镜手术与使用达芬奇SP手术系统的单孔机器人手术的手术效果。材料和方法:我们纳入了23例接受单孔机器人辅助全子宫切除术(SP-RAH)治疗子宫肌瘤的患者和33例接受传统单孔腹腔镜全子宫切除术(SP-TLH)的患者。采用达芬奇SP®系统后第一年的手术结果在两种技术之间进行比较。结果:SP-RAH组与SP-TLH组手术结果差异如下:切除子宫重量:217 (90-500)g vs 256 (100-436) g (P = 0.06);术中出血量:12 (4-147)mL vs 80 (10-780) mL (P < 0.01);总手术时间:199 (131-251)min vs 239 (110-282) min (P < 0.03);气腹手术时间:146 (90-221)min vs 186 (110-282) min (P = 0.03)。SP-RAH术后出血量明显减少,手术时间明显缩短。结论:与传统的单孔腹腔镜相比,达芬奇SP系统可以安全引入单孔全子宫切除术,并改善早期手术效果。未来的研究可能会扩大其应用,以改善伤口对齐和减轻患者负担。