Fan Ge, Guo Lin, Zhenyu Huo, Zhanyu Wang, Nan Sun, Jie He
{"title":"A Comprehensive Study on Clinical Outcomes and Safety of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy Combined With Chemotherapy in Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer.","authors":"Fan Ge, Guo Lin, Zhenyu Huo, Zhanyu Wang, Nan Sun, Jie He","doi":"10.1111/1759-7714.70125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to explore clinical outcomes and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in limited-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC), providing insights for upcoming clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched for relevant original articles and conference proceedings, updated through 10 February 2025. Pathological complete response (pCR) rate and major pathological response (MPR) rate were calculated as the major assessments for the clinical outcomes. The incidences of the rate of R0 resection and treatment-related severe adverse events (tr-SAE) were considered as the primary outcomes for assessing the safety. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to neoadjuvant therapy cycle and study type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 114 patients from 6 studies were included. The meta-analysis results suggested that the pooled rates of pCR and MPR were 35% [95% confidence interval (CI) 14-56] and 49% (95% CI 18-80) in LS-SCLC patients. In terms of safety, most patients achieved R0 surgical resection [95% (95% CI 85-100)] and the pooled incidence of tr-SAE was 44% (95% CI 13-76). Meanwhile, all studies reported that there were no deaths during the perioperative period. Subgroup analysis suggests that more than two neoadjuvant therapy cycles may be associated with better clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, the current research findings demonstrate that neoadjuvant immunotherapy has shown promising clinical efficacy and acceptable safety in SCLC. These results provide valuable reference for upcoming clinical trials regarding the optimal neoadjuvant strategy and potential beneficiary populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":23338,"journal":{"name":"Thoracic Cancer","volume":"16 15","pages":"e70125"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12336672/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thoracic Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.70125","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: This study aims to explore clinical outcomes and safety of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in limited-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC), providing insights for upcoming clinical trials.
Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched for relevant original articles and conference proceedings, updated through 10 February 2025. Pathological complete response (pCR) rate and major pathological response (MPR) rate were calculated as the major assessments for the clinical outcomes. The incidences of the rate of R0 resection and treatment-related severe adverse events (tr-SAE) were considered as the primary outcomes for assessing the safety. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to neoadjuvant therapy cycle and study type.
Results: A total of 114 patients from 6 studies were included. The meta-analysis results suggested that the pooled rates of pCR and MPR were 35% [95% confidence interval (CI) 14-56] and 49% (95% CI 18-80) in LS-SCLC patients. In terms of safety, most patients achieved R0 surgical resection [95% (95% CI 85-100)] and the pooled incidence of tr-SAE was 44% (95% CI 13-76). Meanwhile, all studies reported that there were no deaths during the perioperative period. Subgroup analysis suggests that more than two neoadjuvant therapy cycles may be associated with better clinical outcomes.
Conclusions: In conclusion, the current research findings demonstrate that neoadjuvant immunotherapy has shown promising clinical efficacy and acceptable safety in SCLC. These results provide valuable reference for upcoming clinical trials regarding the optimal neoadjuvant strategy and potential beneficiary populations.
背景:本研究旨在探讨新辅助免疫治疗联合化疗治疗有限期小细胞肺癌(SCLC)的临床疗效和安全性,为后续临床试验提供参考。方法:检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library和ClinicalTrials.gov数据库,检索更新至2025年2月10日的相关原创文章和会议记录。计算病理完全缓解率(pCR)和主要病理缓解率(MPR)作为临床结局的主要评价指标。R0切除率和治疗相关严重不良事件(tr-SAE)的发生率被视为评估安全性的主要结果。根据新辅助治疗周期和研究类型进行亚组分析。结果:6项研究共纳入114例患者。meta分析结果显示,在LS-SCLC患者中,pCR和MPR的合并率分别为35%(95%置信区间(CI) 14-56)和49% (95% CI 18-80)。在安全性方面,大多数患者实现了R0手术切除[95% (95% CI 85-100)], tr-SAE的总发生率为44% (95% CI 13-76)。同时,所有研究均报告围手术期无死亡病例。亚组分析表明,两个以上的新辅助治疗周期可能与更好的临床结果相关。结论:总之,目前的研究结果表明,新辅助免疫治疗在SCLC中具有良好的临床疗效和可接受的安全性。这些结果为未来关于最佳新辅助策略和潜在受益人群的临床试验提供了有价值的参考。
期刊介绍:
Thoracic Cancer aims to facilitate international collaboration and exchange of comprehensive and cutting-edge information on basic, translational, and applied clinical research in lung cancer, esophageal cancer, mediastinal cancer, breast cancer and other thoracic malignancies. Prevention, treatment and research relevant to Asia-Pacific is a focus area, but submissions from all regions are welcomed. The editors encourage contributions relevant to prevention, general thoracic surgery, medical oncology, radiology, radiation medicine, pathology, basic cancer research, as well as epidemiological and translational studies in thoracic cancer. Thoracic Cancer is the official publication of the Chinese Society of Lung Cancer, International Chinese Society of Thoracic Surgery and is endorsed by the Korean Association for the Study of Lung Cancer and the Hong Kong Cancer Therapy Society.
The Journal publishes a range of article types including: Editorials, Invited Reviews, Mini Reviews, Original Articles, Clinical Guidelines, Technological Notes, Imaging in thoracic cancer, Meeting Reports, Case Reports, Letters to the Editor, Commentaries, and Brief Reports.