Fertility treatment after sexual trauma.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Reproductive biomedicine online Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-22 DOI:10.1016/j.rbmo.2025.105022
Ido Feferkorn, Assaf Goldberg, Meital Bonchek, Tatiana Beniar, Dana Taron-Amir, Judith Kadouch Kowalsky, Eytan Giladi Yacobi, Talya Shaulov, Mali Salmon-Divon, Foad Azem
{"title":"Fertility treatment after sexual trauma.","authors":"Ido Feferkorn, Assaf Goldberg, Meital Bonchek, Tatiana Beniar, Dana Taron-Amir, Judith Kadouch Kowalsky, Eytan Giladi Yacobi, Talya Shaulov, Mali Salmon-Divon, Foad Azem","doi":"10.1016/j.rbmo.2025.105022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Research question: </strong>What are the experiences, needs and preferences of women with a history of sexual trauma undergoing fertility treatment?</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Women survivors of sexual violence who were previously referred for, underwent or were undergoing fertility treatment were invited to participate in an online survey. Respondents were asked about which screening tool they preferred to gather information about the history of sexual violence, and to rate the significance of specific triggers related to fertility treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 155 women responded to the survey. The preferred screening tool for a history of sexual violence was an intake form (76 women [63%]) followed by direct questioning (20 women [16.5%]). Only 11 women (9%) preferred not to be screened for a history of sexual violence. The triggers with the highest intensity were arm and leg fixation during egg retrieval (66.2% and 66.8% of women respectively graded the trigger as 5/5). Past pregnancy was associated with a reduction in the intensity of triggers, but this was of small magnitude (5.8%). Although 65 women (59%) preferred a female physician to carry out fertility-related procedures, most women accepted the treating physician regardless of gender as long as the physician was trained in trauma-informed care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Not all triggers related to infertility treatment can be completely avoided; however, a discussion with patients about what may pose a trigger and how to decrease the severity of that trigger is important.</p>","PeriodicalId":21134,"journal":{"name":"Reproductive biomedicine online","volume":"51 4","pages":"105022"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproductive biomedicine online","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2025.105022","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research question: What are the experiences, needs and preferences of women with a history of sexual trauma undergoing fertility treatment?

Design: Women survivors of sexual violence who were previously referred for, underwent or were undergoing fertility treatment were invited to participate in an online survey. Respondents were asked about which screening tool they preferred to gather information about the history of sexual violence, and to rate the significance of specific triggers related to fertility treatment.

Results: A total of 155 women responded to the survey. The preferred screening tool for a history of sexual violence was an intake form (76 women [63%]) followed by direct questioning (20 women [16.5%]). Only 11 women (9%) preferred not to be screened for a history of sexual violence. The triggers with the highest intensity were arm and leg fixation during egg retrieval (66.2% and 66.8% of women respectively graded the trigger as 5/5). Past pregnancy was associated with a reduction in the intensity of triggers, but this was of small magnitude (5.8%). Although 65 women (59%) preferred a female physician to carry out fertility-related procedures, most women accepted the treating physician regardless of gender as long as the physician was trained in trauma-informed care.

Conclusion: Not all triggers related to infertility treatment can be completely avoided; however, a discussion with patients about what may pose a trigger and how to decrease the severity of that trigger is important.

性创伤后的生育治疗。
研究问题:有过性创伤史的女性在接受生育治疗时的经历、需求和偏好是什么?设计:邀请曾被转诊、接受或正在接受生育治疗的性暴力妇女幸存者参加一项在线调查。受访者被问及他们更喜欢哪种筛选工具来收集有关性暴力史的信息,并对与生育治疗相关的特定触发因素的重要性进行评分。结果:共有155名女性参与了调查。性暴力史的首选筛查工具是填写表格(76名妇女[63%]),然后直接询问(20名妇女[16.5%])。只有11名妇女(9%)不愿接受性暴力史筛查。其中强度最大的触发因素是取卵时固定手臂和腿(66.2%和66.8%的女性分别将触发因素评为5/5)。既往妊娠与诱发因素强度降低有关,但幅度较小(5.8%)。尽管65名妇女(59%)更喜欢由女医生进行与生育有关的手术,但大多数妇女接受治疗医生,无论性别,只要医生接受过创伤知情护理方面的培训。结论:并非所有不孕不育的相关诱因都可以完全避免;然而,与患者讨论什么可能构成触发因素以及如何降低触发因素的严重程度是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Reproductive biomedicine online
Reproductive biomedicine online 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.50%
发文量
391
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Reproductive BioMedicine Online covers the formation, growth and differentiation of the human embryo. It is intended to bring to public attention new research on biological and clinical research on human reproduction and the human embryo including relevant studies on animals. It is published by a group of scientists and clinicians working in these fields of study. Its audience comprises researchers, clinicians, practitioners, academics and patients. Context: The period of human embryonic growth covered is between the formation of the primordial germ cells in the fetus until mid-pregnancy. High quality research on lower animals is included if it helps to clarify the human situation. Studies progressing to birth and later are published if they have a direct bearing on events in the earlier stages of pregnancy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信