{"title":"Chronic Diabetic Tractional Retinal Detachment and Poor Visual Acuity: Should We Be Performing Surgery on These Patients?","authors":"Ryan B Rush, Sloan W Rush","doi":"10.1177/24741264251359851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To evaluate the benefits of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) in subjects with poor visual acuity (VA) and a chronic macula-involving tractional retinal detachment (TRD) secondary to proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective, case-controlled chart review was conducted, and patients were divided into (1) a study group that underwent PPV and (2) a control group in which PPV was declined. Both study and control subjects had a baseline VA of hand motions at 3 feet or worse, a PDR-associated macula-involving TRD for more than 6 months, and at least 12 months of follow-up. <b>Results:</b> A total of 175 subjects were analyzed. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between cohorts. The change in VA was improved by 0.78 logMAR (95% CI, 0.64-0.90) in the study group compared with 0.03 logMAR (95% CI, -0.15 to 0.22) in the control group (<i>P <</i> .0001). The rates of achieving 20/200 or better Snellen VA and 20/50 or better Snellen VA were increased in the study group compared with the control group (<i>P <</i> .0001 and <i>P =</i> .007, respectively), and the rates of becoming no light perception, developing neovascular glaucoma, or undergoing enucleation/evisceration during the study period were higher in the control group compared with the study group (<i>P</i> = .02, <i>P <</i> .0001, and <i>P</i> = .03, respectively). <b>Conclusions:</b> Patients with PDR with poor VA and a macula-involving TRD of more than 6 months duration still may have a more meaningful improvement in vision and fewer adverse events when PPV is performed than when PPV is declined in favor of less invasive options.</p>","PeriodicalId":17919,"journal":{"name":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"24741264251359851"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12328344/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24741264251359851","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the benefits of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) in subjects with poor visual acuity (VA) and a chronic macula-involving tractional retinal detachment (TRD) secondary to proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Methods: A retrospective, case-controlled chart review was conducted, and patients were divided into (1) a study group that underwent PPV and (2) a control group in which PPV was declined. Both study and control subjects had a baseline VA of hand motions at 3 feet or worse, a PDR-associated macula-involving TRD for more than 6 months, and at least 12 months of follow-up. Results: A total of 175 subjects were analyzed. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between cohorts. The change in VA was improved by 0.78 logMAR (95% CI, 0.64-0.90) in the study group compared with 0.03 logMAR (95% CI, -0.15 to 0.22) in the control group (P < .0001). The rates of achieving 20/200 or better Snellen VA and 20/50 or better Snellen VA were increased in the study group compared with the control group (P < .0001 and P = .007, respectively), and the rates of becoming no light perception, developing neovascular glaucoma, or undergoing enucleation/evisceration during the study period were higher in the control group compared with the study group (P = .02, P < .0001, and P = .03, respectively). Conclusions: Patients with PDR with poor VA and a macula-involving TRD of more than 6 months duration still may have a more meaningful improvement in vision and fewer adverse events when PPV is performed than when PPV is declined in favor of less invasive options.