Racial and Sex Disparities in US Kidney Transplant Clinical Trials: A Comparative Analysis With National Transplant Registry Data.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Journal of Surgical Research Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-09 DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2025.07.036
Inbar Hazan, Rahim Hirani, Shreeya Agrawal, Joanna Yao, Emily Zhang, Tammy Liu, Ryan Chan, Devon John, Mill Etienne
{"title":"Racial and Sex Disparities in US Kidney Transplant Clinical Trials: A Comparative Analysis With National Transplant Registry Data.","authors":"Inbar Hazan, Rahim Hirani, Shreeya Agrawal, Joanna Yao, Emily Zhang, Tammy Liu, Ryan Chan, Devon John, Mill Etienne","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2025.07.036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chronic kidney disease and kidney failure disproportionately affect racial and ethnic minorities in the United States, yet these populations remain underrepresented in clinical trials, especially in kidney transplantation research. The objective of this study was to analyze the representation of racial, ethnic, and sex groups in US-based kidney transplant clinical trials and assess whether participant demographics reflect the population receiving transplants, using national registry data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 188 completed interventional trials related to kidney transplantation (1995-2022) were extracted from clinicaltrials.gov. Demographic data-including race, ethnicity, and sex-were compared against national data from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. Chi-square tests and logistic regressions were performed to assess representation trends and predictors of demographic data reporting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only 58.51% of trials reported race or ethnicity (P < 0.01). White participants were consistently overrepresented across all time periods, while Black, Asian, multiracial, and Indigenous participants were underrepresented, despite elevated disease burdens (P < 0.0001). From 2011 to 2015 to 2016-2020, Black representation increased significantly (P < 0.001), though still fell short of parity. Multiracial and Asian participants remain markedly underrepresented. Trials with pharmaceutical sponsorship were significantly less likely to report racial or ethnic data (P = 0.008). Females were also underrepresented, comprising only 35.88% of trial participants (P < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The persistent underrepresentation of minority groups and females in kidney transplant trials undermines the generalizability of findings and perpetuates inequities in care. Comprehensive and intersectional demographic reporting should be mandated, and recruitment strategies must prioritize inclusivity to ensure that clinical research equitably serves all affected populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"314 ","pages":"305-311"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2025.07.036","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic kidney disease and kidney failure disproportionately affect racial and ethnic minorities in the United States, yet these populations remain underrepresented in clinical trials, especially in kidney transplantation research. The objective of this study was to analyze the representation of racial, ethnic, and sex groups in US-based kidney transplant clinical trials and assess whether participant demographics reflect the population receiving transplants, using national registry data.

Methods: A total of 188 completed interventional trials related to kidney transplantation (1995-2022) were extracted from clinicaltrials.gov. Demographic data-including race, ethnicity, and sex-were compared against national data from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. Chi-square tests and logistic regressions were performed to assess representation trends and predictors of demographic data reporting.

Results: Only 58.51% of trials reported race or ethnicity (P < 0.01). White participants were consistently overrepresented across all time periods, while Black, Asian, multiracial, and Indigenous participants were underrepresented, despite elevated disease burdens (P < 0.0001). From 2011 to 2015 to 2016-2020, Black representation increased significantly (P < 0.001), though still fell short of parity. Multiracial and Asian participants remain markedly underrepresented. Trials with pharmaceutical sponsorship were significantly less likely to report racial or ethnic data (P = 0.008). Females were also underrepresented, comprising only 35.88% of trial participants (P < 0.0001).

Conclusions: The persistent underrepresentation of minority groups and females in kidney transplant trials undermines the generalizability of findings and perpetuates inequities in care. Comprehensive and intersectional demographic reporting should be mandated, and recruitment strategies must prioritize inclusivity to ensure that clinical research equitably serves all affected populations.

美国肾移植临床试验中的种族和性别差异:与国家移植登记数据的比较分析。
在美国,慢性肾脏疾病和肾衰竭不成比例地影响着种族和少数民族,然而这些人群在临床试验中的代表性仍然不足,特别是在肾移植研究中。本研究的目的是分析美国肾移植临床试验中种族、民族和性别群体的代表性,并使用国家登记数据评估参与者的人口统计学是否反映了接受移植的人群。方法:从临床试验网站(clinicaltrials.gov)上提取1995-2022年完成的188项与肾移植相关的介入试验。人口统计数据——包括种族、民族和性别——与来自器官获取和移植网络的全国数据进行了比较。采用卡方检验和逻辑回归来评估人口统计数据报告的代表性趋势和预测因素。结果:只有58.51%的试验报告了人种或民族(P < 0.01)。尽管疾病负担增加,但白人参与者在所有时间段内的代表性始终过高,而黑人、亚洲人、多种族和土著参与者的代表性不足(P < 0.0001)。从2011年到2015年到2016-2020年,黑人代表人数显著增加(P < 0.001),但仍未达到平等。多种族和亚洲参与者仍然明显不足。由药品赞助的试验报告种族或民族数据的可能性显著降低(P = 0.008)。女性的代表性也不足,仅占试验参与者的35.88% (P < 0.0001)。结论:少数群体和女性在肾移植试验中的持续代表性不足破坏了研究结果的普遍性,并使护理中的不公平现象长期存在。应强制要求全面和交叉的人口统计报告,招聘战略必须优先考虑包容性,以确保临床研究公平地服务于所有受影响的人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
627
审稿时长
138 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories. The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信