Qun Li, Bo Li, Wang Tang, Ke-Ping Peng, Fang Liu, Qiao Liu, Lei Han, Ying-Chun Tang, Xiong-Jun Peng, Gui-Xiang Tian
{"title":"Ultrasonography Combined With Sonoelastography Strain Ratio for the Differentiation of Parotid Masses.","authors":"Qun Li, Bo Li, Wang Tang, Ke-Ping Peng, Fang Liu, Qiao Liu, Lei Han, Ying-Chun Tang, Xiong-Jun Peng, Gui-Xiang Tian","doi":"10.1002/jum.70029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Accurate preoperative differentiation of benign and malignant parotid masses is crucial for determining appropriate treatment strategies. We aimed to investigate the value of combining conventional ultrasonography (US) with the measurement of sonoelastographic strain ratio (SR) for the preoperative differentiation of parotid masses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-center retrospective study of 514 patients who had undergone excision of parotid gland masses from June 2019 to June 2023. Patients underwent preoperative high-resolution imaging, which was performed to record SRs between lesional and peri-lesional tissue.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Histopathologic results disclosed benign lesions in 443 patients and malignant neoplasms in 71 patients. Pleomorphic adenoma and Warthin tumor were the most prevalent histopathologic diagnoses in the benign group. Prevalence rates of specific malignant tumor types did not differ significantly. Lesion shapes differed significantly between benign and malignant lesions, but border definition, echogenicity, and vascularization were similar. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values, and diagnostic performance of US + SR, exceeded those of either US or SR alone. The optimal cutoff point (2.25) was computed by using receiver operating characteristics analysis (area under the curve 0.908). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the strain index values were 88.7, 83.8, and 84.2%, respectively, when the optimal cutoff point of 2.25 was used.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SR combined with US can more accurately differentiate benign from malignant parotid gland masses than either US or SR alone; and can thereby facilitate the optimal design of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":17563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.70029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Accurate preoperative differentiation of benign and malignant parotid masses is crucial for determining appropriate treatment strategies. We aimed to investigate the value of combining conventional ultrasonography (US) with the measurement of sonoelastographic strain ratio (SR) for the preoperative differentiation of parotid masses.
Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective study of 514 patients who had undergone excision of parotid gland masses from June 2019 to June 2023. Patients underwent preoperative high-resolution imaging, which was performed to record SRs between lesional and peri-lesional tissue.
Results: Histopathologic results disclosed benign lesions in 443 patients and malignant neoplasms in 71 patients. Pleomorphic adenoma and Warthin tumor were the most prevalent histopathologic diagnoses in the benign group. Prevalence rates of specific malignant tumor types did not differ significantly. Lesion shapes differed significantly between benign and malignant lesions, but border definition, echogenicity, and vascularization were similar. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values, and diagnostic performance of US + SR, exceeded those of either US or SR alone. The optimal cutoff point (2.25) was computed by using receiver operating characteristics analysis (area under the curve 0.908). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the strain index values were 88.7, 83.8, and 84.2%, respectively, when the optimal cutoff point of 2.25 was used.
Conclusion: SR combined with US can more accurately differentiate benign from malignant parotid gland masses than either US or SR alone; and can thereby facilitate the optimal design of diagnostic and therapeutic interventions.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine (JUM) is dedicated to the rapid, accurate publication of original articles dealing with all aspects of medical ultrasound, particularly its direct application to patient care but also relevant basic science, advances in instrumentation, and biological effects. The journal is an official publication of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and publishes articles in a variety of categories, including Original Research papers, Review Articles, Pictorial Essays, Technical Innovations, Case Series, Letters to the Editor, and more, from an international bevy of countries in a continual effort to showcase and promote advances in the ultrasound community.
Represented through these efforts are a wide variety of disciplines of ultrasound, including, but not limited to:
-Basic Science-
Breast Ultrasound-
Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound-
Dermatology-
Echocardiography-
Elastography-
Emergency Medicine-
Fetal Echocardiography-
Gastrointestinal Ultrasound-
General and Abdominal Ultrasound-
Genitourinary Ultrasound-
Gynecologic Ultrasound-
Head and Neck Ultrasound-
High Frequency Clinical and Preclinical Imaging-
Interventional-Intraoperative Ultrasound-
Musculoskeletal Ultrasound-
Neurosonology-
Obstetric Ultrasound-
Ophthalmologic Ultrasound-
Pediatric Ultrasound-
Point-of-Care Ultrasound-
Public Policy-
Superficial Structures-
Therapeutic Ultrasound-
Ultrasound Education-
Ultrasound in Global Health-
Urologic Ultrasound-
Vascular Ultrasound