The efficacy of luliconazole and caspofungin on planktonic and biofilm of Candida albicans from different sources.

IF 1.7 Q4 MICROBIOLOGY
Mahboubeh Shabanzadeh, Ali Rezaei-Matehkolaei, Ali Zarei Mahmoudabadi
{"title":"The efficacy of luliconazole and caspofungin on planktonic and biofilm of <i>Candida albicans</i> from different sources.","authors":"Mahboubeh Shabanzadeh, Ali Rezaei-Matehkolaei, Ali Zarei Mahmoudabadi","doi":"10.18502/ijm.v17i4.19261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The ability of <i>Candida albicans</i> to produce biofilm is considered an important pathogenic factor. In addition, the low sensitivity of biofilms to antifungal drugs is a challenge for patients, clinicians, and laboratory workers. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of luliconazole and caspofungin on the planktonic and biofilm types of <i>C. albicans</i> strains.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifty <i>C. albicans</i> from vaginitis, candiduria, gastrointestinal candidiasis, and saliva were examined for antifungal susceptibility against caspofungin and luliconazole using the CLSI M27 guideline. Moreover, the susceptibility of biofilms was detected using 96 well microplates and the MTT method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The capacity of the isolates to produce biofilm within 2, 6, and 24 h was different, however, all tested isolates produced biofilm after 24 h. Vaginal and esophagitis isolates had a high and low ability for biofilm production during 24-hour incubation. In our study, 90% of isolates were sensitive to caspofungin, while 7.5 and 2.5% of them were intermediate and resistant. The MIC range of all isolates against luliconazole was 0.01562-1 μg/mL.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The MICs of biofilms were 15.6, and 171.3 higher than that of planktonic cells for caspofungin and luliconazole, respectively. Moreover, paradoxical and trailing effects occurred at 4 and 32 μg/mL of caspofungin and luliconazole, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":14633,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Microbiology","volume":"17 4","pages":"653-659"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12331462/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijm.v17i4.19261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: The ability of Candida albicans to produce biofilm is considered an important pathogenic factor. In addition, the low sensitivity of biofilms to antifungal drugs is a challenge for patients, clinicians, and laboratory workers. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of luliconazole and caspofungin on the planktonic and biofilm types of C. albicans strains.

Materials and methods: Fifty C. albicans from vaginitis, candiduria, gastrointestinal candidiasis, and saliva were examined for antifungal susceptibility against caspofungin and luliconazole using the CLSI M27 guideline. Moreover, the susceptibility of biofilms was detected using 96 well microplates and the MTT method.

Results: The capacity of the isolates to produce biofilm within 2, 6, and 24 h was different, however, all tested isolates produced biofilm after 24 h. Vaginal and esophagitis isolates had a high and low ability for biofilm production during 24-hour incubation. In our study, 90% of isolates were sensitive to caspofungin, while 7.5 and 2.5% of them were intermediate and resistant. The MIC range of all isolates against luliconazole was 0.01562-1 μg/mL.

Conclusion: The MICs of biofilms were 15.6, and 171.3 higher than that of planktonic cells for caspofungin and luliconazole, respectively. Moreover, paradoxical and trailing effects occurred at 4 and 32 μg/mL of caspofungin and luliconazole, respectively.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

吕立康唑和卡泊芬净对不同来源白色念珠菌浮游和生物膜的影响。
背景与目的:白色念珠菌产生生物膜的能力被认为是一个重要的致病因素。此外,生物膜对抗真菌药物的低敏感性对患者、临床医生和实验室工作人员来说是一个挑战。目的探讨卢立康唑和卡泊真菌素对白色念珠菌浮游型和生物膜型的影响。材料和方法:采用CLSI M27指南检测50例来自阴道炎、念珠菌病、胃肠道念珠菌病和唾液的白色念珠菌对卡泊真菌素和luliconazole的抗真菌敏感性。采用96孔微孔板和MTT法检测生物膜的敏感性。结果:分离株在2、6和24 h内产生生物膜的能力不同,但所有分离株在24 h后都产生生物膜。阴道和食管炎分离株在24小时培养期间产生生物膜的能力有高低之分。在我们的研究中,90%的分离株对caspofungin敏感,7.5%和2.5%的分离株为中间耐药。所有菌株对露立康唑的MIC范围为0.01562-1 μg/mL。结论:卡泊芬菌素生物膜的mic分别比浮游细胞高15.6和171.3。卡泊fungin和luliconazole分别在4和32 μg/mL时出现了悖论效应和尾随效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
96
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Iranian Journal of Microbiology (IJM) is an international, multi-disciplinary, peer-reviewed journal that provides rapid publication of the most advanced scientific research in the areas of basic and applied research on bacteria and other micro-organisms, including bacteria, viruses, yeasts, fungi, microalgae, and protozoa concerning the development of tools for diagnosis and disease control, epidemiology, antimicrobial agents, clinical microbiology, immunology, Genetics, Genomics and Molecular Biology. Contributions may be in the form of original research papers, review articles, short communications, case reports, technical reports, and letters to the Editor. Research findings must be novel and the original data must be available for review by the Editors, if necessary. Studies that are preliminary, of weak originality or merely descriptive as well as negative results are not appropriate for the journal. Papers considered for publication must be unpublished work (except in an abstract form) that is not under consideration for publication anywhere else, and all co-authors should have agreed to the submission. Manuscripts should be written in English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信