A comparative study on diagnostic accuracy of rapid card test, IgM ELISA and real time-PCR in detecting scrub typhus infection: a cross-sectional study from tertiary care hospital.

IF 1.7 Q4 MICROBIOLOGY
Gopinath Ramalingam, Arundadhi Muthukumar, Dhanasezhian Aridass, Krishnapriya Subramani, Sucila Thangam Ganesan
{"title":"A comparative study on diagnostic accuracy of rapid card test, IgM ELISA and real time-PCR in detecting scrub typhus infection: a cross-sectional study from tertiary care hospital.","authors":"Gopinath Ramalingam, Arundadhi Muthukumar, Dhanasezhian Aridass, Krishnapriya Subramani, Sucila Thangam Ganesan","doi":"10.18502/ijm.v17i4.19249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Scrub typhus, caused by <i>Orientia tsutsugamushi</i>, is a significant zoonotic illness in the Asia-Pacific region. Timely diagnosis is crucial, but overlapping symptoms and limitations of traditional diagnostic methods pose challenges. This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy and utility of IgM ELISA, RT-PCR, and Rapid Card test for Scrub typhus, focusing on sensitivity, specificity, and practical applicability in endemic regions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted on 192 patients with suspected Scrub typhus at a tertiary care hospital from June to November 2024. Diagnostic tests included Rapid Card, IgM ELISA, and RT-PCR. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were calculated, along with clinical and demographic data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>IgM ELISA had the highest sensitivity (96.30%) and specificity (100%), followed by Rapid Card (sensitivity: 93.55%, specificity: 99.38%) and RT-PCR (sensitivity: 92.86%, specificity: 99.44%). Common symptoms included fever (99.4%) and headache (95.8%). Positive cases were mostly males (56.7%-64.3%) and individuals aged 21-40 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IgM ELISA shows high sensitivity and specificity for Scrub typhus, while RT-PCR aids early detection. The Rapid Card offers a quick field alternative. Combining molecular and serological methods can enhance diagnostic accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14633,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Microbiology","volume":"17 4","pages":"600-605"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12331450/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijm.v17i4.19249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Scrub typhus, caused by Orientia tsutsugamushi, is a significant zoonotic illness in the Asia-Pacific region. Timely diagnosis is crucial, but overlapping symptoms and limitations of traditional diagnostic methods pose challenges. This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy and utility of IgM ELISA, RT-PCR, and Rapid Card test for Scrub typhus, focusing on sensitivity, specificity, and practical applicability in endemic regions.

Materials and methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 192 patients with suspected Scrub typhus at a tertiary care hospital from June to November 2024. Diagnostic tests included Rapid Card, IgM ELISA, and RT-PCR. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were calculated, along with clinical and demographic data.

Results: IgM ELISA had the highest sensitivity (96.30%) and specificity (100%), followed by Rapid Card (sensitivity: 93.55%, specificity: 99.38%) and RT-PCR (sensitivity: 92.86%, specificity: 99.44%). Common symptoms included fever (99.4%) and headache (95.8%). Positive cases were mostly males (56.7%-64.3%) and individuals aged 21-40 years.

Conclusion: IgM ELISA shows high sensitivity and specificity for Scrub typhus, while RT-PCR aids early detection. The Rapid Card offers a quick field alternative. Combining molecular and serological methods can enhance diagnostic accuracy.

快速卡试验、IgM酶联免疫吸附试验和实时荧光定量pcr检测恙虫病诊断准确性的比较研究——来自三级医院的横断面研究
背景和目的:恙虫病东方体引起的恙虫病是亚太地区一种重要的人畜共患疾病。及时诊断至关重要,但症状重叠和传统诊断方法的局限性构成了挑战。本研究评估IgM ELISA、RT-PCR和快速卡检测对恙虫病的诊断准确性和实用性,重点关注敏感性、特异性和流行地区的实用性。材料与方法:对某三级医院2024年6 - 11月收治的192例恙虫病疑似病例进行横断面研究。诊断试验包括快速卡片、IgM ELISA和RT-PCR。计算敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和准确性,并结合临床和人口统计学数据。结果:IgM ELISA检测灵敏度最高(96.30%)、特异度最高(100%),其次为Rapid Card(灵敏度93.55%、特异度99.38%)、RT-PCR(灵敏度92.86%、特异度99.44%)。常见症状包括发热(99.4%)和头痛(95.8%)。阳性病例以男性(56.7% ~ 64.3%)为主,年龄在21 ~ 40岁之间。结论:IgM ELISA检测恙虫病具有较高的敏感性和特异性,而RT-PCR有助于早期检测。快速卡提供了一个快速的现场替代方案。分子和血清学方法相结合可提高诊断的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
96
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Iranian Journal of Microbiology (IJM) is an international, multi-disciplinary, peer-reviewed journal that provides rapid publication of the most advanced scientific research in the areas of basic and applied research on bacteria and other micro-organisms, including bacteria, viruses, yeasts, fungi, microalgae, and protozoa concerning the development of tools for diagnosis and disease control, epidemiology, antimicrobial agents, clinical microbiology, immunology, Genetics, Genomics and Molecular Biology. Contributions may be in the form of original research papers, review articles, short communications, case reports, technical reports, and letters to the Editor. Research findings must be novel and the original data must be available for review by the Editors, if necessary. Studies that are preliminary, of weak originality or merely descriptive as well as negative results are not appropriate for the journal. Papers considered for publication must be unpublished work (except in an abstract form) that is not under consideration for publication anywhere else, and all co-authors should have agreed to the submission. Manuscripts should be written in English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信