Blood transcriptomic for the diagnosis of nosocomial infections in critically ill patients: an observational proof-of-concept study.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Ruben Martín-Latorre, Kaya Haener, Hugo Arrando, Juan Frasquet, Mónica Gordón, Amparo Martinez, Carlos Folgado, Álvaro Castellanos-Ortega, Paula Ramirez
{"title":"Blood transcriptomic for the diagnosis of nosocomial infections in critically ill patients: an observational proof-of-concept study.","authors":"Ruben Martín-Latorre, Kaya Haener, Hugo Arrando, Juan Frasquet, Mónica Gordón, Amparo Martinez, Carlos Folgado, Álvaro Castellanos-Ortega, Paula Ramirez","doi":"10.1007/s15010-025-02602-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The assessment of genetic activation has shown good diagnostic capacity in identifying sepsis in patients at the emergency department or upon admission to the intensive care unit. This study evaluates a gene expression diagnostic test for identifying nosocomial infections in critically ill patients and compares it with well-established tests used in routine clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, observational, non-interventional study conducted in a single intensive care unit of a tertiary university hospital. Adult critically ill patients were enrolled if their attending physician suspected a nosocomial ICU-acquired infection, and a comprehensive microbiological study was performed. The genetic host response was assessed using the SeptiCyte RAPID assay at study inclusion, alongside microbiological, analytical, and radiological evaluations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-nine patients were enrolled, of whom 78.3% (n 54) received empirical antimicrobial treatment. ICU-acquired infection was confirmed in 35 patients (50.7%). A bacterial etiology was established in 32 cases (91.4%), and viral reactivation was diagnosed in 2 cases (5.7%). Diagnostic capacity was measured as follows: procalcitonin AUC 0.600 (95% CI 0.454-0.745), C-reactive protein AUC 0.703 (95% CI 0.564-0.839) and Septi-Cyte RAPID AUC 0.995 (95% CI 0.930-1.003). The optimal cut-off point for Septi-cyte score was 6.35, yielding a sensitivity of 91.4%, specificity of 73.5%, and positive and negative predictive values of 78% and 89.3%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Genetic activation analysis in patients with suspected ICU-acquired nosocomial sepsis demonstrated good diagnostic capability, even surpassing traditional inflammatory biomarkers.</p>","PeriodicalId":13600,"journal":{"name":"Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-025-02602-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The assessment of genetic activation has shown good diagnostic capacity in identifying sepsis in patients at the emergency department or upon admission to the intensive care unit. This study evaluates a gene expression diagnostic test for identifying nosocomial infections in critically ill patients and compares it with well-established tests used in routine clinical practice.

Methods: This was a prospective, observational, non-interventional study conducted in a single intensive care unit of a tertiary university hospital. Adult critically ill patients were enrolled if their attending physician suspected a nosocomial ICU-acquired infection, and a comprehensive microbiological study was performed. The genetic host response was assessed using the SeptiCyte RAPID assay at study inclusion, alongside microbiological, analytical, and radiological evaluations.

Results: Sixty-nine patients were enrolled, of whom 78.3% (n 54) received empirical antimicrobial treatment. ICU-acquired infection was confirmed in 35 patients (50.7%). A bacterial etiology was established in 32 cases (91.4%), and viral reactivation was diagnosed in 2 cases (5.7%). Diagnostic capacity was measured as follows: procalcitonin AUC 0.600 (95% CI 0.454-0.745), C-reactive protein AUC 0.703 (95% CI 0.564-0.839) and Septi-Cyte RAPID AUC 0.995 (95% CI 0.930-1.003). The optimal cut-off point for Septi-cyte score was 6.35, yielding a sensitivity of 91.4%, specificity of 73.5%, and positive and negative predictive values of 78% and 89.3%, respectively.

Conclusions: Genetic activation analysis in patients with suspected ICU-acquired nosocomial sepsis demonstrated good diagnostic capability, even surpassing traditional inflammatory biomarkers.

血液转录组学用于诊断危重患者的医院感染:一项观察性概念验证研究。
目的:基因激活的评估已显示出良好的诊断能力,以确定败血症患者在急诊科或入院时的重症监护病房。本研究评估了一种用于鉴定危重患者医院感染的基因表达诊断测试,并将其与常规临床实践中使用的成熟测试进行了比较。方法:这是一项前瞻性、观察性、非介入性研究,在一所三级大学附属医院的单个重症监护室进行。如果其主治医生怀疑患有院内重症监护病房获得性感染,则纳入成年危重患者,并进行全面的微生物学研究。在研究纳入时,使用SeptiCyte RAPID测定法评估遗传宿主反应,同时进行微生物学、分析学和放射学评估。结果:69例患者入组,其中78.3%(54例)接受经验性抗菌药物治疗。icu获得性感染35例(50.7%)。细菌病因32例(91.4%),病毒再激活2例(5.7%)。诊断能力测定如下:降钙素原AUC 0.600 (95% CI 0.454-0.745), c反应蛋白AUC 0.703 (95% CI 0.564-0.839), Septi-Cyte RAPID AUC 0.995 (95% CI 0.930-1.003)。败血症细胞评分的最佳临界值为6.35,敏感性为91.4%,特异性为73.5%,阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为78%和89.3%。结论:基因激活分析在疑似icu获得性院内败血症患者中显示出良好的诊断能力,甚至超过了传统的炎症生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infection
Infection 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
12.50
自引率
1.30%
发文量
224
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Infection is a journal dedicated to serving as a global forum for the presentation and discussion of clinically relevant information on infectious diseases. Its primary goal is to engage readers and contributors from various regions around the world in the exchange of knowledge about the etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of infectious diseases, both in outpatient and inpatient settings. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including: Etiology: The study of the causes of infectious diseases. Pathogenesis: The process by which an infectious agent causes disease. Diagnosis: The methods and techniques used to identify infectious diseases. Treatment: The medical interventions and strategies employed to treat infectious diseases. Public Health: Issues of local, regional, or international significance related to infectious diseases, including prevention, control, and management strategies. Hospital Epidemiology: The study of the spread of infectious diseases within healthcare settings and the measures to prevent nosocomial infections. In addition to these, Infection also includes a specialized "Images" section, which focuses on high-quality visual content, such as images, photographs, and microscopic slides, accompanied by brief abstracts. This section is designed to highlight the clinical and diagnostic value of visual aids in the field of infectious diseases, as many conditions present with characteristic clinical signs that can be diagnosed through inspection, and imaging and microscopy are crucial for accurate diagnosis. The journal's comprehensive approach ensures that it remains a valuable resource for healthcare professionals and researchers in the field of infectious diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信