Parsa Lorestani, Ferdos Faghihkhorasani, Homina Saffar, Behnam Darabi, Yasaman Tavakoli, Amir Mohammad Lorestani, Mohammad Ghiasi, Kimia Jazi
{"title":"The Impact of Cholecystectomy on Colorectal Cancer Risk: A Comprehensive Review on Risk Factors and the Association.","authors":"Parsa Lorestani, Ferdos Faghihkhorasani, Homina Saffar, Behnam Darabi, Yasaman Tavakoli, Amir Mohammad Lorestani, Mohammad Ghiasi, Kimia Jazi","doi":"10.1007/s11894-025-01008-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>This review examines the debated association between cholecystectomy and colorectal cancer risk. The goal is to evaluate biological mechanisms, epidemiological evidence, and related risk factors to better understand this potential association.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Cholecystectomy may increase CRC risk through altered bile acid metabolism and gut microbiota changes, particularly in the right colon. Epidemiological studies, however, yield mixed outcomes: some show a heightened CRC risk following surgery, especially in women and for proximal colon cancers, while others find no notable link or even a lower risk compared to individuals with untreated gallstones. No clear consensus exists on the cholecystectomy-CRC link. Biological evidence hints at a possible connection, yet epidemiological findings are inconsistent, calling for more prospective research to resolve this uncertainty. Until conclusive answers emerge, high-risk patients' post-cholecystectomy may benefit from enhanced CRC screening and lifestyle adjustments, influencing future clinical and research directions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10776,"journal":{"name":"Current Gastroenterology Reports","volume":"27 1","pages":"59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Gastroenterology Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-025-01008-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose of review: This review examines the debated association between cholecystectomy and colorectal cancer risk. The goal is to evaluate biological mechanisms, epidemiological evidence, and related risk factors to better understand this potential association.
Recent findings: Cholecystectomy may increase CRC risk through altered bile acid metabolism and gut microbiota changes, particularly in the right colon. Epidemiological studies, however, yield mixed outcomes: some show a heightened CRC risk following surgery, especially in women and for proximal colon cancers, while others find no notable link or even a lower risk compared to individuals with untreated gallstones. No clear consensus exists on the cholecystectomy-CRC link. Biological evidence hints at a possible connection, yet epidemiological findings are inconsistent, calling for more prospective research to resolve this uncertainty. Until conclusive answers emerge, high-risk patients' post-cholecystectomy may benefit from enhanced CRC screening and lifestyle adjustments, influencing future clinical and research directions.
期刊介绍:
As the field of gastroenterology and hepatology rapidly evolves, the wealth of published literature can be overwhelming. The aim of the journal is to help readers stay abreast of such advances by offering authoritative, systematic reviews by leading experts. We accomplish this aim by appointing Section Editors who invite international experts to contribute review articles that highlight recent developments and important papers published in the past year. Major topics in gastroenterology are covered, including pediatric gastroenterology, neuromuscular disorders, infections, nutrition, and inflammatory bowel disease. These reviews provide clear, insightful summaries of expert perspectives relevant to clinical practice. An Editorial Board of internationally diverse members suggests topics of special interest to their country/region and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. We also provide commentaries from well-known figures in the field.