The effect of sandblasting distances on the shear bond strength of a self-etch and total-etch adhesive system to cervical dentin in the gingival wall of Class II restorations.
{"title":"The effect of sandblasting distances on the shear bond strength of a self-etch and total-etch adhesive system to cervical dentin in the gingival wall of Class II restorations.","authors":"Sima Gholami, Alireza Boruziniat, Hossein Bagheri, Reza Shakiba","doi":"10.4103/drj.drj_398_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to examine the effect of sandblasting on the shear bond strength (SBS) of two adhesive systems on cervical dentin in the gingival wall of Class II restorations at two different distances.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this <i>in vitro</i> study, 88 intact premolars were used. After creating a natural smear layer, samples were divided into self-etch (CLEARFIL LINER BOND F) and total-etch (Adper Single Bond 2) groups (<i>n</i> = 44). Each group was subdivided into subgroups (<i>n</i> = 22) for sandblasting at 5 mm or 10 mm, with the contralateral half as control. Following sandblasting (50-μm particles, 2 bar, 2 s), the resin composite was bonded to the dentin surface, with the SBS of the samples measured using a universal testing machine. The samples were examined using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) and analyzed by an energy dispersive X-Ray (EDX). The results were analyzed using three-way repeated measures analysis of variance and Chi-square tests (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sandblasting significantly reduced the SBS in both adhesive groups (<i>P</i> < 0.001). However, the adhesive system and distance did not significantly affect the bond strength (<i>P</i> > 0.05). The SEM images displayed the formation of irregularities in the smear layer, and EDX analysis revealed the presence of residual alumina particles on the blasted dentin samples.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cervical dentine sandblasting reduced the adhesive SBS regardless of the 5- or 10-mm distance or the adhesive system used. Thus, sandblasting is not recommended as a method of dentin preparation before restoring cervical lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":11016,"journal":{"name":"Dental Research Journal","volume":"22 ","pages":"30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12334089/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/drj.drj_398_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to examine the effect of sandblasting on the shear bond strength (SBS) of two adhesive systems on cervical dentin in the gingival wall of Class II restorations at two different distances.
Materials and methods: In this in vitro study, 88 intact premolars were used. After creating a natural smear layer, samples were divided into self-etch (CLEARFIL LINER BOND F) and total-etch (Adper Single Bond 2) groups (n = 44). Each group was subdivided into subgroups (n = 22) for sandblasting at 5 mm or 10 mm, with the contralateral half as control. Following sandblasting (50-μm particles, 2 bar, 2 s), the resin composite was bonded to the dentin surface, with the SBS of the samples measured using a universal testing machine. The samples were examined using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) and analyzed by an energy dispersive X-Ray (EDX). The results were analyzed using three-way repeated measures analysis of variance and Chi-square tests (α = 0.05).
Results: Sandblasting significantly reduced the SBS in both adhesive groups (P < 0.001). However, the adhesive system and distance did not significantly affect the bond strength (P > 0.05). The SEM images displayed the formation of irregularities in the smear layer, and EDX analysis revealed the presence of residual alumina particles on the blasted dentin samples.
Conclusion: Cervical dentine sandblasting reduced the adhesive SBS regardless of the 5- or 10-mm distance or the adhesive system used. Thus, sandblasting is not recommended as a method of dentin preparation before restoring cervical lesions.
期刊介绍:
Dental Research Journal, a publication of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, is a peer-reviewed online journal with Bimonthly print on demand compilation of issues published. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.drjjournal.net. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository. The journal will cover technical and clinical studies related to health, ethical and social issues in field of Dentistry. Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.