Comparison of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate fluoride paste and a propolis-containing herbal toothpaste in dentinal hypersensitivity: A randomized trial.

Q2 Dentistry
Dental Research Journal Pub Date : 2025-07-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4103/drj.drj_499_24
Narges Naghsh, Ahmad Mogharehabed, Elham Amini, Amirhossein Sahebkar
{"title":"Comparison of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate fluoride paste and a propolis-containing herbal toothpaste in dentinal hypersensitivity: A randomized trial.","authors":"Narges Naghsh, Ahmad Mogharehabed, Elham Amini, Amirhossein Sahebkar","doi":"10.4103/drj.drj_499_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to compare the efficacy of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate fluoride (CPP-ACPF) and propolis-based herbal toothpaste in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity (DH).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this clinical trial, 20 patients (7 men and 13 women) who met the inclusion criteria were randomly divided into two groups. One group received the herbal toothpaste containing propolis (Herbex<sup>®</sup>), while the other received a paste containing CPP-ACPF (GC<sup>®</sup> MI-Paste Plus). Two nonadjacent teeth with DH in two quadrants of each patient were assessed. The pain was determined through the visual analog scale (VAS) in cold and airblast tests before the intervention (baseline) as well as at 15 min, 1, 2, 4, and 8 weeks after the first application. Three-level mixed effect model (repeated measurement, tooth, and patients) was used to analyze the VAS score data. Estimation of fixed effect parameters with standard error and the intraclass correlation coefficient that quantifies the degree to which data at the lower level are correlated were reported. The statistical significance level was determined as <i>P</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean pain intensity score after 8 weeks significantly decreased in the propolis-based toothpaste group (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and CPP-ACPF paste group (<i>P</i> < 0.001) compared with baseline. Betweenn-group comparison in the 8<sup>th</sup> week showed a significantly lower pain score in the propolis-based toothpaste group compared with the CPP-ACPF-containing paste (<i>P</i> = 0.02). However, at other intervals, there were no significant differences between the two groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of both herbal toothpaste containing propolis and CPP-ACPF-containing paste for 8 weeks effectively reduced DH, with a higher desensitizing effect experienced in the former group.</p>","PeriodicalId":11016,"journal":{"name":"Dental Research Journal","volume":"22 ","pages":"31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12334092/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dental Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/drj.drj_499_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate fluoride (CPP-ACPF) and propolis-based herbal toothpaste in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity (DH).

Materials and methods: In this clinical trial, 20 patients (7 men and 13 women) who met the inclusion criteria were randomly divided into two groups. One group received the herbal toothpaste containing propolis (Herbex®), while the other received a paste containing CPP-ACPF (GC® MI-Paste Plus). Two nonadjacent teeth with DH in two quadrants of each patient were assessed. The pain was determined through the visual analog scale (VAS) in cold and airblast tests before the intervention (baseline) as well as at 15 min, 1, 2, 4, and 8 weeks after the first application. Three-level mixed effect model (repeated measurement, tooth, and patients) was used to analyze the VAS score data. Estimation of fixed effect parameters with standard error and the intraclass correlation coefficient that quantifies the degree to which data at the lower level are correlated were reported. The statistical significance level was determined as P < 0.05.

Results: The mean pain intensity score after 8 weeks significantly decreased in the propolis-based toothpaste group (P < 0.001) and CPP-ACPF paste group (P < 0.001) compared with baseline. Betweenn-group comparison in the 8th week showed a significantly lower pain score in the propolis-based toothpaste group compared with the CPP-ACPF-containing paste (P = 0.02). However, at other intervals, there were no significant differences between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: The use of both herbal toothpaste containing propolis and CPP-ACPF-containing paste for 8 weeks effectively reduced DH, with a higher desensitizing effect experienced in the former group.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

酪蛋白磷酸肽-无定形氟化磷酸钙膏剂与含蜂胶的草药牙膏治疗牙本质过敏的比较:一项随机试验。
背景:本研究旨在比较酪蛋白磷酸肽-无定形氟化磷酸钙(CPP-ACPF)和蜂胶基草药牙膏治疗牙本质过敏症(DH)的疗效。材料与方法:本临床试验将符合纳入标准的20例患者(男7例,女13例)随机分为两组。一组使用含有蜂胶的草药牙膏(Herbex®),另一组使用含有pcp - acpf (GC®MI-Paste Plus)的牙膏。在每个患者的两个象限中评估两个具有DH的非相邻牙齿。在干预前(基线)以及第一次应用后15分钟、1、2、4和8周,通过视觉模拟评分(VAS)来确定疼痛。采用三水平混合效应模型(重复测量、牙齿、患者)对VAS评分数据进行分析。报告了固定效应参数的标准误差估计和量化较低水平数据相关程度的类内相关系数。以P < 0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:与基线相比,蜂胶牙膏组和CPP-ACPF牙膏组8周后的平均疼痛强度评分均显著降低(P < 0.001)。第8周组间比较显示,含蜂胶牙膏组疼痛评分明显低于含cpp - acpf牙膏组(P = 0.02)。但在其他时间间隔,两组间差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:含蜂胶的中药牙膏和含cpp - acpf的中药牙膏使用8周均能有效降低DH,且前者脱敏效果更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dental Research Journal
Dental Research Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
70
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊介绍: Dental Research Journal, a publication of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, is a peer-reviewed online journal with Bimonthly print on demand compilation of issues published. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.drjjournal.net. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository. The journal will cover technical and clinical studies related to health, ethical and social issues in field of Dentistry. Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信