Barriers to Early Hospital Presentation in Acute Stroke: Findings from a Cohort Study.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Bindu Menon, Jyoti Conjeevaram, Sudarsana Amavarapu
{"title":"Barriers to Early Hospital Presentation in Acute Stroke: Findings from a Cohort Study.","authors":"Bindu Menon, Jyoti Conjeevaram, Sudarsana Amavarapu","doi":"10.4103/aian.aian_225_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>The time taken to transport patients for thrombolytic therapy in stroke cases remains alarmingly high, compromising potential positive outcomes. Addressing these delays can enhance prehospital care and improve patient prognoses.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to identify factors causing delays in treating acute stroke patients at a tertiary care hospital in southern India, to inform better practices and expedite care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Caregivers of ischemic stroke patients were interviewed about delays. Patients were divided into two groups: those who arrived within the critical four-and-a-half-hour window (Group A) and those who arrived later (Group B). Data collected included distance from home to hospital, transportation options, and mode of transport. A comparative analysis was performed between patients from stroke-ready facilities versus others, with data analyzed using SPSS software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 594 patients, with 73.4% arriving outside the recommended window. Women represented one-third of the population overall and 20% in Group A. Younger patients arrived sooner (P < 0.0001). The main reason for delays was a lack of awareness of stroke symptoms (53.2%), followed by initial care sought at non-stroke-ready hospitals (23%). Use of ambulances and vehicle ownership significantly correlated with faster arrivals (P < 0.0001), while distance to the hospital did not significantly affect timeliness. Though most of the variables showed statistical significance between those coming to the hospital within and outside the four-and-a-half hour window with univariate analysis, none of the variables showed a significant association when subjected to logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Delays in stroke treatment are a major concern, linked to factors like age, gender, and transportation issues. No single factor independently predicted early hospital arrival. To improve outcomes, we need strategies that enhance public education, symptom recognition, and transportation-especially for vulnerable groups like women and the elderly.</p>","PeriodicalId":8036,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aian.aian_225_25","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: The time taken to transport patients for thrombolytic therapy in stroke cases remains alarmingly high, compromising potential positive outcomes. Addressing these delays can enhance prehospital care and improve patient prognoses.

Aim: This study aimed to identify factors causing delays in treating acute stroke patients at a tertiary care hospital in southern India, to inform better practices and expedite care.

Methods: Caregivers of ischemic stroke patients were interviewed about delays. Patients were divided into two groups: those who arrived within the critical four-and-a-half-hour window (Group A) and those who arrived later (Group B). Data collected included distance from home to hospital, transportation options, and mode of transport. A comparative analysis was performed between patients from stroke-ready facilities versus others, with data analyzed using SPSS software.

Results: The study included 594 patients, with 73.4% arriving outside the recommended window. Women represented one-third of the population overall and 20% in Group A. Younger patients arrived sooner (P < 0.0001). The main reason for delays was a lack of awareness of stroke symptoms (53.2%), followed by initial care sought at non-stroke-ready hospitals (23%). Use of ambulances and vehicle ownership significantly correlated with faster arrivals (P < 0.0001), while distance to the hospital did not significantly affect timeliness. Though most of the variables showed statistical significance between those coming to the hospital within and outside the four-and-a-half hour window with univariate analysis, none of the variables showed a significant association when subjected to logistic regression.

Conclusions: Delays in stroke treatment are a major concern, linked to factors like age, gender, and transportation issues. No single factor independently predicted early hospital arrival. To improve outcomes, we need strategies that enhance public education, symptom recognition, and transportation-especially for vulnerable groups like women and the elderly.

急性中风早期住院表现的障碍:一项队列研究的结果。
背景和目的:运送脑卒中患者接受溶栓治疗的时间仍然高得惊人,影响了潜在的积极结果。解决这些延误可以加强院前护理和改善患者预后。目的:本研究旨在确定导致印度南部三级医院治疗急性中风患者延误的因素,为更好的实践和加快护理提供信息。方法:对缺血性脑卒中患者的护理人员进行延迟访谈。患者被分为两组:在关键的四个半小时窗口内到达的患者(A组)和较晚到达的患者(B组)。收集的数据包括从家到医院的距离、交通选择和交通方式。对来自中风准备机构的患者与其他机构的患者进行比较分析,数据分析使用SPSS软件。结果:该研究纳入594例患者,73.4%的患者在推荐时间外到达。女性占总人数的三分之一,在a组中占20%。年轻患者到达时间较早(P < 0.0001)。延误的主要原因是缺乏对中风症状的认识(53.2%),其次是在没有中风准备的医院寻求初步治疗(23%)。使用救护车和车辆拥有量与更快到达显著相关(P < 0.0001),而到医院的距离对及时性没有显著影响。尽管单变量分析显示,在4个半小时窗口内和4个半小时窗口外就诊的患者之间的大多数变量具有统计学意义,但在进行逻辑回归时,没有一个变量显示出显著的关联。结论:卒中治疗延迟是一个主要问题,与年龄、性别和交通问题等因素有关。没有单一因素能独立预测提前到达医院。为了改善结果,我们需要加强公共教育、症状识别和交通的战略,特别是针对妇女和老年人等弱势群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology
Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology Nervous System Diseases-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
293
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal has a clinical foundation and has been utilized most by clinical neurologists for improving the practice of neurology. While the focus is on neurology in India, the journal publishes manuscripts of high value from all parts of the world. Journal publishes reviews of various types, original articles, short communications, interesting images and case reports. The journal respects the scientific submission of its authors and believes in following an expeditious double-blind peer review process and endeavors to complete the review process within scheduled time frame. A significant effort from the author and the journal perhaps enables to strike an equilibrium to meet the professional expectations of the peers in the world of scientific publication. AIAN believes in safeguarding the privacy rights of human subjects. In order to comply with it, the journal instructs all authors when uploading the manuscript to also add the ethical clearance (human/animals)/ informed consent of subject in the manuscript. This applies to the study/case report that involves animal/human subjects/human specimens e.g. extracted tooth part/soft tissue for biopsy/in vitro analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信