Comparison of phonemic awareness in children with auditory processing disorder and children without auditory processing disorder using an objective test for assessing phonemic hearing: A preliminary study.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Andrzej K Konopka, Julia Pyttel, Anna Kasprzyk, Grażyna Mielnik-Niedzielska, Artur Niedzielski
{"title":"Comparison of phonemic awareness in children with auditory processing disorder and children without auditory processing disorder using an objective test for assessing phonemic hearing: A preliminary study.","authors":"Andrzej K Konopka, Julia Pyttel, Anna Kasprzyk, Grażyna Mielnik-Niedzielska, Artur Niedzielski","doi":"10.17219/acem/204557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Phonemic awareness is defined as the ability to break down a word into smaller units called phonemes or described as the ability to synthesize words from segments of one's own speech. Impaired phonemic hearing, depending on the degree of severity, hinders or prevents speech reception, disrupts the proper development of a child's pronunciation, may cause disorders in already developed speech, and complicates the acquisition of writing skills or disturbs the skill that has already been acquired.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To create an objectified tool for phonemic hearing diagnostics to ensure that verbal material is always presented at the same intensity, from the same distance, and in the same direction. Another aim was to compare children with and without auditory processing disorder (APD) if they have disrupted phonemic hearing.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A study involving 20 individuals was conducted using a sound level meter to determine the level of the auditory stimulus (therapist's voice) provided to patients during the diagnosis. Each participant in the study was tasked with repeating, in the most natural way for them, 2 pairs of words containing opposing sounds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis revealed significant discrepancies both in the articulation of verbal material by different examiners and in the presentation of the same material by a single examiner using different methods. When the same phonemic opposition was presented in an identical manner by different diagnosticians, amplitude differences of up to 10.8 dB were observed, with a standard deviation (SD) of 2.5 dB. These findings underscored the need to develop an objectified tool for phonemic hearing diagnostics to ensure consistency and reliability in assessment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the research group encompassing children with APD, disorders within phonemic hearing occur more frequently and have a deeper nature. Phonemic hearing disorders in children are associated with significant difficulties in learning and daily functioning.</p>","PeriodicalId":7306,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/204557","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Phonemic awareness is defined as the ability to break down a word into smaller units called phonemes or described as the ability to synthesize words from segments of one's own speech. Impaired phonemic hearing, depending on the degree of severity, hinders or prevents speech reception, disrupts the proper development of a child's pronunciation, may cause disorders in already developed speech, and complicates the acquisition of writing skills or disturbs the skill that has already been acquired.

Objectives: To create an objectified tool for phonemic hearing diagnostics to ensure that verbal material is always presented at the same intensity, from the same distance, and in the same direction. Another aim was to compare children with and without auditory processing disorder (APD) if they have disrupted phonemic hearing.

Material and methods: A study involving 20 individuals was conducted using a sound level meter to determine the level of the auditory stimulus (therapist's voice) provided to patients during the diagnosis. Each participant in the study was tasked with repeating, in the most natural way for them, 2 pairs of words containing opposing sounds.

Results: The analysis revealed significant discrepancies both in the articulation of verbal material by different examiners and in the presentation of the same material by a single examiner using different methods. When the same phonemic opposition was presented in an identical manner by different diagnosticians, amplitude differences of up to 10.8 dB were observed, with a standard deviation (SD) of 2.5 dB. These findings underscored the need to develop an objectified tool for phonemic hearing diagnostics to ensure consistency and reliability in assessment.

Conclusions: In the research group encompassing children with APD, disorders within phonemic hearing occur more frequently and have a deeper nature. Phonemic hearing disorders in children are associated with significant difficulties in learning and daily functioning.

听觉加工障碍儿童与非听觉加工障碍儿童音位意识的客观测试比较:初步研究。
背景:音位意识被定义为将一个单词分解成称为音位的更小单位的能力,或者被描述为从自己的讲话片段中合成单词的能力。音位听力受损,视其严重程度而定,会阻碍或阻止言语的接受,扰乱儿童发音的正常发展,可能导致已经发展的言语障碍,并使写作技能的习得复杂化或干扰已经习得的技能。目的:创建一种客观化的音位听力诊断工具,以确保语言材料始终以相同的强度、相同的距离和相同的方向呈现。另一个目的是比较患有和没有听觉处理障碍(APD)的儿童,如果他们的音素听力受损。材料和方法:一项涉及20人的研究使用声级计来确定在诊断期间提供给患者的听觉刺激(治疗师的声音)的水平。研究中的每个参与者都被要求以对他们来说最自然的方式重复两对包含相反发音的单词。结果:分析显示,在不同考官对口头材料的发音和同一考官使用不同方法对同一材料的陈述中,存在显著差异。当不同的诊断医师以相同的方式呈现相同的音位对立时,观察到的幅度差异高达10.8 dB,标准差(SD)为2.5 dB。这些发现强调需要开发一种客观的音位听力诊断工具,以确保评估的一致性和可靠性。结论:在包含APD儿童的研究组中,音素听力障碍发生频率更高,且具有更深层次的性质。儿童音位性听力障碍与学习和日常功能方面的重大困难有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
153
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine has been published by the Wroclaw Medical University since 1992. Establishing the medical journal was the idea of Prof. Bogumił Halawa, Chair of the Department of Cardiology, and was fully supported by the Rector of Wroclaw Medical University, Prof. Zbigniew Knapik. Prof. Halawa was also the first editor-in-chief, between 1992-1997. The journal, then entitled "Postępy Medycyny Klinicznej i Doświadczalnej", appeared quarterly. Prof. Leszek Paradowski was editor-in-chief from 1997-1999. In 1998 he initiated alterations in the profile and cover design of the journal which were accepted by the Editorial Board. The title was changed to Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine. Articles in English were welcomed. A number of outstanding representatives of medical science from Poland and abroad were invited to participate in the newly established International Editorial Staff. Prof. Antonina Harłozińska-Szmyrka was editor-in-chief in years 2000-2005, in years 2006-2007 once again prof. Leszek Paradowski and prof. Maria Podolak-Dawidziak was editor-in-chief in years 2008-2016. Since 2017 the editor-in chief is prof. Maciej Bagłaj. Since July 2005, original papers have been published only in English. Case reports are no longer accepted. The manuscripts are reviewed by two independent reviewers and a statistical reviewer, and English texts are proofread by a native speaker. The journal has been indexed in several databases: Scopus, Ulrich’sTM International Periodicals Directory, Index Copernicus and since 2007 in Thomson Reuters databases: Science Citation Index Expanded i Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition. In 2010 the journal obtained Impact Factor which is now 1.179 pts. Articles published in the journal are worth 15 points among Polish journals according to the Polish Committee for Scientific Research and 169.43 points according to the Index Copernicus. Since November 7, 2012, Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine has been indexed and included in National Library of Medicine’s MEDLINE database. English abstracts printed in the journal are included and searchable using PubMed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信