Assessing Long-Term Stored Tissues for Multi-Omics Data Quality and Proteogenomics Suitability

IF 3.6 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Kyu Jin Song, Minsuh Kim, Yong Jin Heo, Kyung-Cho Cho, Jae-Won Oh, Dae Ho Kim, Chanwoong Hwa, Yeji Do, Seunghyuk Choi, Hee Sang Hwang, Kwoneel Kim, Kyunggon Kim, Seungjin Na, Eunok Paek, Joon-Yong An, Se Jin Jang, Min-Sik Kim* and Kwang Pyo Kim*, 
{"title":"Assessing Long-Term Stored Tissues for Multi-Omics Data Quality and Proteogenomics Suitability","authors":"Kyu Jin Song,&nbsp;Minsuh Kim,&nbsp;Yong Jin Heo,&nbsp;Kyung-Cho Cho,&nbsp;Jae-Won Oh,&nbsp;Dae Ho Kim,&nbsp;Chanwoong Hwa,&nbsp;Yeji Do,&nbsp;Seunghyuk Choi,&nbsp;Hee Sang Hwang,&nbsp;Kwoneel Kim,&nbsp;Kyunggon Kim,&nbsp;Seungjin Na,&nbsp;Eunok Paek,&nbsp;Joon-Yong An,&nbsp;Se Jin Jang,&nbsp;Min-Sik Kim* and Kwang Pyo Kim*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.jproteome.5c00289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >As research into cancer biology progresses, multiomics analyses have become essential for unraveling its molecular complexities. However, sample availability remains a challenge due to factors such as collection procedures and long-term storage effects. Archived samples present an opportunity to expand multiomics studies, but concerns persist regarding storage duration’s impact on data reliability. This study examines the genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic profiles of samples stored for over a decade. Transcriptomic analysis revealed a decline in read counts for protein-coding genes but preserved core gene expression patterns. Proteomic measurements remained stable, with minimal changes in post-translational modifications. While phosphorylation and acetylation rates were largely unaffected, a slight increase in modification frequencies was observed. Housekeeping genes and proteins exhibited consistent expression across samples, yet proteomic differences between the tumor and normal tissues were distinct. Despite technical variations in transcriptomic data, essential transcription factors and kinases retained functionality. These findings underscore the viability of archived samples for multiomics research, enabling broader investigations into cancer biology and providing insights into molecular mechanisms. By leveraging archived specimens, researchers can overcome sample limitations and advance precision oncology efforts, ultimately deepening our understanding of cancer at the systems level.</p>","PeriodicalId":48,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Proteome Research","volume":"24 9","pages":"4563–4574"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Proteome Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jproteome.5c00289","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As research into cancer biology progresses, multiomics analyses have become essential for unraveling its molecular complexities. However, sample availability remains a challenge due to factors such as collection procedures and long-term storage effects. Archived samples present an opportunity to expand multiomics studies, but concerns persist regarding storage duration’s impact on data reliability. This study examines the genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic profiles of samples stored for over a decade. Transcriptomic analysis revealed a decline in read counts for protein-coding genes but preserved core gene expression patterns. Proteomic measurements remained stable, with minimal changes in post-translational modifications. While phosphorylation and acetylation rates were largely unaffected, a slight increase in modification frequencies was observed. Housekeeping genes and proteins exhibited consistent expression across samples, yet proteomic differences between the tumor and normal tissues were distinct. Despite technical variations in transcriptomic data, essential transcription factors and kinases retained functionality. These findings underscore the viability of archived samples for multiomics research, enabling broader investigations into cancer biology and providing insights into molecular mechanisms. By leveraging archived specimens, researchers can overcome sample limitations and advance precision oncology efforts, ultimately deepening our understanding of cancer at the systems level.

Abstract Image

评估长期储存组织的多组学数据质量和蛋白质基因组学适用性。
随着对癌症生物学研究的进展,多组学分析已成为揭示其分子复杂性的必要手段。然而,由于收集程序和长期储存影响等因素,样品的可用性仍然是一个挑战。存档的样本为扩展多组学研究提供了机会,但关于存储时间对数据可靠性的影响的担忧仍然存在。本研究检查了储存超过十年的样本的基因组、转录组和蛋白质组谱。转录组学分析显示,蛋白质编码基因的读取计数下降,但核心基因表达模式保留。蛋白质组学测量保持稳定,翻译后修饰变化极小。虽然磷酸化和乙酰化率在很大程度上未受影响,但观察到修饰频率略有增加。管家基因和蛋白质在样本中表现出一致的表达,但肿瘤组织和正常组织之间的蛋白质组学差异是明显的。尽管转录组学数据在技术上存在差异,但必要的转录因子和激酶保持了功能。这些发现强调了多组学研究存档样本的可行性,使对癌症生物学的更广泛研究和对分子机制的深入了解成为可能。通过利用存档标本,研究人员可以克服样本限制并推进精确肿瘤学工作,最终加深我们在系统层面上对癌症的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Proteome Research
Journal of Proteome Research 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
4.50%
发文量
251
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Proteome Research publishes content encompassing all aspects of global protein analysis and function, including the dynamic aspects of genomics, spatio-temporal proteomics, metabonomics and metabolomics, clinical and agricultural proteomics, as well as advances in methodology including bioinformatics. The theme and emphasis is on a multidisciplinary approach to the life sciences through the synergy between the different types of "omics".
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信