Social and Financial Barriers to Safe (Drinking) Water and Sanitation: The Role of Development Agents in Ethiopia

IF 1.7 4区 经济学 Q3 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Martin Paul Tabe-Ojong Jr., Guyo Godana Dureti
{"title":"Social and Financial Barriers to Safe (Drinking) Water and Sanitation: The Role of Development Agents in Ethiopia","authors":"Martin Paul Tabe-Ojong Jr.,&nbsp;Guyo Godana Dureti","doi":"10.1002/jid.70003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The use of water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) practices remains an important development agenda, but their use is currently low in many developing countries owing to several social and financial barriers. In this paper, we investigate the role of development agents (DAs) in stirring the use of safe drinking water and sanitation practices. We examine access to DAs at the extensive and intensive margins and relate this to some WASH practices such as access to piped water, protected springs, open springs, improved latrines, pit latrines and open defecation. We rely on a rich panel dataset from households in Ethiopia and estimate both the Mundlak–Chamberlain device and the household fixed effect estimator. We find a positive association between DAs (both at the extensive and intensive margins) and the use of improved and pit latrines. Relatedly, we also establish a negative association between DAs and open defecation. Furthermore, we obtain a positive relationship between DAs and drinking water from protected springs at the intensive margin and a negative with the use of open springs. Delving into what may be driving these relationships, we find suggestive evidence that income, membership in social and cooperative groups, access to credit—from banks or microfinance institutions as well as enhanced social networks may—well explain these results. Our findings underscore the importance of social and financial factors as possible enablers/barriers of the adoption of WASH practices. Given this, we provide support to the strengthening of extension and advisory systems as they have the potential to increase safe (drinking) water and sanitation practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":47986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Development","volume":"37 6","pages":"1255-1266"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jid.70003","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Development","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jid.70003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) practices remains an important development agenda, but their use is currently low in many developing countries owing to several social and financial barriers. In this paper, we investigate the role of development agents (DAs) in stirring the use of safe drinking water and sanitation practices. We examine access to DAs at the extensive and intensive margins and relate this to some WASH practices such as access to piped water, protected springs, open springs, improved latrines, pit latrines and open defecation. We rely on a rich panel dataset from households in Ethiopia and estimate both the Mundlak–Chamberlain device and the household fixed effect estimator. We find a positive association between DAs (both at the extensive and intensive margins) and the use of improved and pit latrines. Relatedly, we also establish a negative association between DAs and open defecation. Furthermore, we obtain a positive relationship between DAs and drinking water from protected springs at the intensive margin and a negative with the use of open springs. Delving into what may be driving these relationships, we find suggestive evidence that income, membership in social and cooperative groups, access to credit—from banks or microfinance institutions as well as enhanced social networks may—well explain these results. Our findings underscore the importance of social and financial factors as possible enablers/barriers of the adoption of WASH practices. Given this, we provide support to the strengthening of extension and advisory systems as they have the potential to increase safe (drinking) water and sanitation practices.

安全饮用水和卫生设施的社会和财政障碍:埃塞俄比亚发展机构的作用
使用水、环境卫生和个人卫生(WASH)做法仍然是一项重要的发展议程,但由于一些社会和财政障碍,目前许多发展中国家的使用率很低。在本文中,我们调查了发展动因(DAs)在促进使用安全饮用水和卫生习惯方面的作用。我们审查了广泛和密集边缘地区获得饮用水的情况,并将其与一些WASH做法联系起来,例如获得自来水、受保护的泉水、露天泉水、改善的厕所、坑式厕所和露天排便。我们依靠来自埃塞俄比亚家庭的丰富面板数据集,并估计蒙德拉克-张伯伦装置和家庭固定效应估计器。我们发现DAs(在粗放型和集约型边际)与改良厕所和坑式厕所的使用之间存在正相关。相关的,我们也建立了DAs和露天排便之间的负相关。此外,我们得到了DAs与密集边缘保护泉的饮用水呈正相关,与开放泉的使用呈负相关。深入研究这些关系背后的原因,我们发现收入、社会和合作团体的成员资格、从银行或小额信贷机构获得信贷的途径以及增强的社会网络都可以很好地解释这些结果。我们的研究结果强调了社会和经济因素的重要性,这些因素可能是采取WASH做法的推动因素/障碍因素。鉴于此,我们为加强推广和咨询系统提供支持,因为它们有可能增加安全(饮用水)和卫生做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: The Journal aims to publish the best research on international development issues in a form that is accessible to practitioners and policy-makers as well as to an academic audience. The main focus is on the social sciences - economics, politics, international relations, sociology and anthropology, as well as development studies - but we also welcome articles that blend the natural and social sciences in addressing the challenges for development. The Journal does not represent any particular school, analytical technique or methodological approach, but aims to publish high quality contributions to ideas, frameworks, policy and practice, including in transitional countries and underdeveloped areas of the Global North as well as the Global South.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信