{"title":"The effect of different surface treatments on the shear bond strength of new generation zirconia","authors":"Merve Buse Kultas Kaleli, Oğuz Eraslan","doi":"10.1111/ijac.15183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study aimed to assess the effect of various surface roughening techniques on the shear bond strength of three new-generation zirconia ceramics. Specimens of 4Y-TZP/5Y-TZP zirconia (IPS e.max ZirCAD), 3Y-TZP monolithic zirconia (Vita YZ HT), and 3Y-TZP/5Y-TZP zirconia (IPS e.max ZirCAD Prime) were prepared using CAD/CAM and sintered as per manufacturers' instructions. Four surface treatments—control, sandblasting, tribochemical silica coating(TSC), and Er:YAG laser etching—were applied to yield 12 subgroups (<i>n</i> = 10). Specimens were treated with an MDP primer and cemented using dual-cure self-adhesive resin cement. Shear bond strength was measured using a universal testing machine at 1 mm/min. Statistical analysis included Shapiro-Wilk, two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Tukey HSD tests (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Sandblasting and TSC significantly improved shear bond strength (<i>p</i> < .001). The Vita YZ HT group exhibited higher bond strength compared with IPS e.max ZirCAD (<i>p</i> = 0.004). Cohesive and mixed fractures predominated in sandblasting and TSC groups, whereas Er:YAG laser treatment yielded bond strength similar to controls (<i>p</i> = .386). Shear bond strength is influenced by the type of zirconia ceramic, surface treatment, and their interaction (<i>p</i> < .001). Sandblasting and TSC are highly effective, underscoring the clinical importance of surface preparation for durable zirconia bonding.</p>","PeriodicalId":13903,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology","volume":"22 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ceramics.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ijac.15183","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://ceramics.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijac.15183","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CERAMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the effect of various surface roughening techniques on the shear bond strength of three new-generation zirconia ceramics. Specimens of 4Y-TZP/5Y-TZP zirconia (IPS e.max ZirCAD), 3Y-TZP monolithic zirconia (Vita YZ HT), and 3Y-TZP/5Y-TZP zirconia (IPS e.max ZirCAD Prime) were prepared using CAD/CAM and sintered as per manufacturers' instructions. Four surface treatments—control, sandblasting, tribochemical silica coating(TSC), and Er:YAG laser etching—were applied to yield 12 subgroups (n = 10). Specimens were treated with an MDP primer and cemented using dual-cure self-adhesive resin cement. Shear bond strength was measured using a universal testing machine at 1 mm/min. Statistical analysis included Shapiro-Wilk, two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Tukey HSD tests (p < 0.05). Sandblasting and TSC significantly improved shear bond strength (p < .001). The Vita YZ HT group exhibited higher bond strength compared with IPS e.max ZirCAD (p = 0.004). Cohesive and mixed fractures predominated in sandblasting and TSC groups, whereas Er:YAG laser treatment yielded bond strength similar to controls (p = .386). Shear bond strength is influenced by the type of zirconia ceramic, surface treatment, and their interaction (p < .001). Sandblasting and TSC are highly effective, underscoring the clinical importance of surface preparation for durable zirconia bonding.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology publishes cutting edge applied research and development work focused on commercialization of engineered ceramics, products and processes. The publication also explores the barriers to commercialization, design and testing, environmental health issues, international standardization activities, databases, and cost models. Designed to get high quality information to end-users quickly, the peer process is led by an editorial board of experts from industry, government, and universities. Each issue focuses on a high-interest, high-impact topic plus includes a range of papers detailing applications of ceramics. Papers on all aspects of applied ceramics are welcome including those in the following areas:
Nanotechnology applications;
Ceramic Armor;
Ceramic and Technology for Energy Applications (e.g., Fuel Cells, Batteries, Solar, Thermoelectric, and HT Superconductors);
Ceramic Matrix Composites;
Functional Materials;
Thermal and Environmental Barrier Coatings;
Bioceramic Applications;
Green Manufacturing;
Ceramic Processing;
Glass Technology;
Fiber optics;
Ceramics in Environmental Applications;
Ceramics in Electronic, Photonic and Magnetic Applications;