The assessment of economic complexity and financial development on environmental quality: evidence for panel cointegration approach

IF 2.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Hamrouni Daghbagi, Radhouane Hasni, Mehdi Ben Jebli
{"title":"The assessment of economic complexity and financial development on environmental quality: evidence for panel cointegration approach","authors":"Hamrouni Daghbagi,&nbsp;Radhouane Hasni,&nbsp;Mehdi Ben Jebli","doi":"10.1007/s11869-025-01757-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The environment plays a crucial role in mitigating ecological catastrophes by safeguarding the atmosphere. Environmental quality in developed nations is influenced by various factors, with economic complexity and financial development indices standing out prominently among other influencing factors. This study investigates the impact of economic complexity (specifically, trade and technology) and financial development (including global, institutional, and market indices) on carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) emissions within a panel of G20 countries using multiple models. Real GDP, along with renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, serves as explanatory variables in the empirical modeling. Employing panel cointegration techniques, the study covers the period from 1999 to 2021. Empirical findings reveal that all variables are integrated of order one, and the cross-sectional dependence test (CD) suggests the application of first-generation unit root tests. Pedroni cointegration tests further confirm long-run cointegration in all models. The Fully modified OLS (FMOLS) and the Canonical Cointegrating Regression (CCR) long-run estimations indicate that global, institutional, and market financial indices, as well as the economic complexity index of trade, are associated with decreased CO2 emissions. Conversely, the economic complexity index of technology is linked to increased CO2 emissions in the long run. Interaction variables linking financial development indices with economic complexity indices have demonstrated a significant and negative impact on CO2 emissions. These results carry important policy implications, suggesting that G20 countries should prioritize export diversification toward more complex, energy-efficient products and leverage financial development to support structural transformation. Additionally, by using financial tools to enhance technological sophistication (e.g., patent quality), governments can help reverse the adverse effects of technological complexity on the environment, thereby fostering long-term CO₂ mitigation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49109,"journal":{"name":"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health","volume":"18 7","pages":"2111 - 2126"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Air Quality Atmosphere and Health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11869-025-01757-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The environment plays a crucial role in mitigating ecological catastrophes by safeguarding the atmosphere. Environmental quality in developed nations is influenced by various factors, with economic complexity and financial development indices standing out prominently among other influencing factors. This study investigates the impact of economic complexity (specifically, trade and technology) and financial development (including global, institutional, and market indices) on carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions within a panel of G20 countries using multiple models. Real GDP, along with renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, serves as explanatory variables in the empirical modeling. Employing panel cointegration techniques, the study covers the period from 1999 to 2021. Empirical findings reveal that all variables are integrated of order one, and the cross-sectional dependence test (CD) suggests the application of first-generation unit root tests. Pedroni cointegration tests further confirm long-run cointegration in all models. The Fully modified OLS (FMOLS) and the Canonical Cointegrating Regression (CCR) long-run estimations indicate that global, institutional, and market financial indices, as well as the economic complexity index of trade, are associated with decreased CO2 emissions. Conversely, the economic complexity index of technology is linked to increased CO2 emissions in the long run. Interaction variables linking financial development indices with economic complexity indices have demonstrated a significant and negative impact on CO2 emissions. These results carry important policy implications, suggesting that G20 countries should prioritize export diversification toward more complex, energy-efficient products and leverage financial development to support structural transformation. Additionally, by using financial tools to enhance technological sophistication (e.g., patent quality), governments can help reverse the adverse effects of technological complexity on the environment, thereby fostering long-term CO₂ mitigation.

经济复杂性和金融发展对环境质量的影响:基于面板协整方法的证据
环境在保护大气、减轻生态灾害方面发挥着至关重要的作用。发达国家的环境质量受到多种因素的影响,其中经济复杂性和金融发展指数的影响最为突出。本研究使用多种模型调查了G20国家的经济复杂性(特别是贸易和技术)和金融发展(包括全球、制度和市场指数)对二氧化碳(CO2)排放的影响。在实证建模中,实际GDP以及可再生和不可再生能源消费作为解释变量。采用面板协整技术,研究涵盖1999年至2021年。实证结果表明,所有变量都是一阶积分,截面相关性检验(CD)建议采用第一代单位根检验。Pedroni协整检验进一步证实了所有模型的长期协整。完全修正OLS (FMOLS)和典型协整回归(CCR)的长期估计表明,全球、制度和市场金融指标以及贸易的经济复杂性指数与二氧化碳排放的减少有关。相反,从长远来看,技术的经济复杂性指数与二氧化碳排放量的增加有关。将金融发展指数与经济复杂性指数联系起来的交互变量对二氧化碳排放产生了显著的负向影响。这些结果具有重要的政策意义,表明G20国家应优先考虑出口多元化,转向更复杂、更节能的产品,并利用金融发展来支持结构转型。此外,通过使用金融工具来提高技术复杂性(例如专利质量),政府可以帮助扭转技术复杂性对环境的不利影响,从而促进长期的二氧化碳减排。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Air Quality Atmosphere and Health
Air Quality Atmosphere and Health ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
2.00%
发文量
146
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Air Quality, Atmosphere, and Health is a multidisciplinary journal which, by its very name, illustrates the broad range of work it publishes and which focuses on atmospheric consequences of human activities and their implications for human and ecological health. It offers research papers, critical literature reviews and commentaries, as well as special issues devoted to topical subjects or themes. International in scope, the journal presents papers that inform and stimulate a global readership, as the topic addressed are global in their import. Consequently, we do not encourage submission of papers involving local data that relate to local problems. Unless they demonstrate wide applicability, these are better submitted to national or regional journals. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health addresses such topics as acid precipitation; airborne particulate matter; air quality monitoring and management; exposure assessment; risk assessment; indoor air quality; atmospheric chemistry; atmospheric modeling and prediction; air pollution climatology; climate change and air quality; air pollution measurement; atmospheric impact assessment; forest-fire emissions; atmospheric science; greenhouse gases; health and ecological effects; clean air technology; regional and global change and satellite measurements. This journal benefits a diverse audience of researchers, public health officials and policy makers addressing problems that call for solutions based in evidence from atmospheric and exposure assessment scientists, epidemiologists, and risk assessors. Publication in the journal affords the opportunity to reach beyond defined disciplinary niches to this broader readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信