Juan Pablo Ríos-Ocampo , Giovanni Cunico , Michael Shayne Gary
{"title":"Fragmentation and complexity as obstacles to the beyond GDP transition","authors":"Juan Pablo Ríos-Ocampo , Giovanni Cunico , Michael Shayne Gary","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2025.108758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Calls to adopt alternative measures of progress beyond Gross Domestic Product (GDP) have increased over time because of well-documented limitations of GDP in capturing social and environmental aspects of societal well-being. Despite the availability of numerous alternative measures, none have been widely adopted by policymakers or become prominent in the social discourse. We develop a causal map to provide a systems perspective explanation for the increasing number of alternative measures and their low adoption. Causal mapping helped identify the underlying system structure and to present a coherent and integrated understanding of earlier work. To ground the causal map, we reviewed and integrated the extant literature on beyond GDP adoption and implementation. Our analysis highlights that continuous calls for the development of broader beyond GDP measures may have the paradoxical effect of strengthening GDP use. The numerous existing alternative measures of progress and the steady introduction of new measures have fragmented the beyond GDP message. The need to differentiate from existing measures creates pressure to add new elements and undermines convergence towards an easy-to-understand beyond GDP measure. The systems analysis explains the resistance to the well-intentioned efforts to develop alternative measures of progress and shows the importance of redirecting this effort towards building a strong consensus around one or a handful of alternative measures to activate the diffusion process.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51021,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Economics","volume":"239 ","pages":"Article 108758"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800925002411","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Calls to adopt alternative measures of progress beyond Gross Domestic Product (GDP) have increased over time because of well-documented limitations of GDP in capturing social and environmental aspects of societal well-being. Despite the availability of numerous alternative measures, none have been widely adopted by policymakers or become prominent in the social discourse. We develop a causal map to provide a systems perspective explanation for the increasing number of alternative measures and their low adoption. Causal mapping helped identify the underlying system structure and to present a coherent and integrated understanding of earlier work. To ground the causal map, we reviewed and integrated the extant literature on beyond GDP adoption and implementation. Our analysis highlights that continuous calls for the development of broader beyond GDP measures may have the paradoxical effect of strengthening GDP use. The numerous existing alternative measures of progress and the steady introduction of new measures have fragmented the beyond GDP message. The need to differentiate from existing measures creates pressure to add new elements and undermines convergence towards an easy-to-understand beyond GDP measure. The systems analysis explains the resistance to the well-intentioned efforts to develop alternative measures of progress and shows the importance of redirecting this effort towards building a strong consensus around one or a handful of alternative measures to activate the diffusion process.
期刊介绍:
Ecological Economics is concerned with extending and integrating the understanding of the interfaces and interplay between "nature''s household" (ecosystems) and "humanity''s household" (the economy). Ecological economics is an interdisciplinary field defined by a set of concrete problems or challenges related to governing economic activity in a way that promotes human well-being, sustainability, and justice. The journal thus emphasizes critical work that draws on and integrates elements of ecological science, economics, and the analysis of values, behaviors, cultural practices, institutional structures, and societal dynamics. The journal is transdisciplinary in spirit and methodologically open, drawing on the insights offered by a variety of intellectual traditions, and appealing to a diverse readership.
Specific research areas covered include: valuation of natural resources, sustainable agriculture and development, ecologically integrated technology, integrated ecologic-economic modelling at scales from local to regional to global, implications of thermodynamics for economics and ecology, renewable resource management and conservation, critical assessments of the basic assumptions underlying current economic and ecological paradigms and the implications of alternative assumptions, economic and ecological consequences of genetically engineered organisms, and gene pool inventory and management, alternative principles for valuing natural wealth, integrating natural resources and environmental services into national income and wealth accounts, methods of implementing efficient environmental policies, case studies of economic-ecologic conflict or harmony, etc. New issues in this area are rapidly emerging and will find a ready forum in Ecological Economics.