Comparison of clinical outcomes between catheter ablation and permanent pacemaker implantation in Tachycardia-Bradycardia Syndrome patients: a meta-analysis

IF 2.5 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Sunu Budhi Raharjo , Emir Yonas , Sarah Naura Irbah , Dicky Armein Hanafy , Muhammad Rizky Felani , Aldo Ferly , Fa Po Chung
{"title":"Comparison of clinical outcomes between catheter ablation and permanent pacemaker implantation in Tachycardia-Bradycardia Syndrome patients: a meta-analysis","authors":"Sunu Budhi Raharjo ,&nbsp;Emir Yonas ,&nbsp;Sarah Naura Irbah ,&nbsp;Dicky Armein Hanafy ,&nbsp;Muhammad Rizky Felani ,&nbsp;Aldo Ferly ,&nbsp;Fa Po Chung","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcha.2025.101767","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Tachycardia-Bradycardia Syndrome (TBS) is a clinical disorder resulting from complications associated with sick sinus syndrome (SSS). In patients with SSS, TBS is marked by alternating episodes of tachycardia and bradycardia. This <em>meta</em>-analysis aims to evaluate and compare the differences in clinical outcomes between ablation and pacemaker treatments for TBS.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a systematic search on libraries, including PubMed, EuropePMC, SCOPUS, Cochrane Central, and medRxiv, for preprint studies. The search terms used were “Tachycardia Bradycardia Syndrome,” “Pacing,” and “Ablation” between the pacing and ablation groups in TBS patients. Review Manager Software Version 5.4 (Cochrane Collaboration) was used to perform the <em>meta</em>-analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified 1,138 potential articles from our search, and 521 duplicates were removed. After screening the titles and abstracts of the remaining 662 articles, we obtained 23 potentially relevant articles. Finally, we included the remaining eight studies in our qualitative synthesis and <em>meta</em>-analysis, which comprised 1,266 patients.</div><div>Catheter ablation was associated with a lower incidence of AF recurrence (OR of 0.09 [0.04, 0.22; p &lt; 0.001], with moderate heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 76 %, p &lt; 0.001), stroke (OR of 0.28 [0.14, 0.53; p &lt; 0.001] low heterogeneity I<sup>2</sup> = 0 %, p = 0.99 favouring the ablation group.) and lower mortality (OR of 0.37 [0.17, 0.80; p0.01] low heterogeneity I<sup>2</sup> = 0 %, p = 0.84 favouring the ablation group), compared to those who underwent pacemaker implantation in patients with TBS.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Catheter ablation resulted in a lower incidence of AF recurrence, stroke, and mortality compared to the pacemaker in TBS patients. There was no difference between groups regarding procedure-related complications and cardiovascular rehospitalization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38026,"journal":{"name":"IJC Heart and Vasculature","volume":"60 ","pages":"Article 101767"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJC Heart and Vasculature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352906725001708","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Tachycardia-Bradycardia Syndrome (TBS) is a clinical disorder resulting from complications associated with sick sinus syndrome (SSS). In patients with SSS, TBS is marked by alternating episodes of tachycardia and bradycardia. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate and compare the differences in clinical outcomes between ablation and pacemaker treatments for TBS.

Methods

We performed a systematic search on libraries, including PubMed, EuropePMC, SCOPUS, Cochrane Central, and medRxiv, for preprint studies. The search terms used were “Tachycardia Bradycardia Syndrome,” “Pacing,” and “Ablation” between the pacing and ablation groups in TBS patients. Review Manager Software Version 5.4 (Cochrane Collaboration) was used to perform the meta-analysis.

Results

We identified 1,138 potential articles from our search, and 521 duplicates were removed. After screening the titles and abstracts of the remaining 662 articles, we obtained 23 potentially relevant articles. Finally, we included the remaining eight studies in our qualitative synthesis and meta-analysis, which comprised 1,266 patients.
Catheter ablation was associated with a lower incidence of AF recurrence (OR of 0.09 [0.04, 0.22; p < 0.001], with moderate heterogeneity (I2 = 76 %, p < 0.001), stroke (OR of 0.28 [0.14, 0.53; p < 0.001] low heterogeneity I2 = 0 %, p = 0.99 favouring the ablation group.) and lower mortality (OR of 0.37 [0.17, 0.80; p0.01] low heterogeneity I2 = 0 %, p = 0.84 favouring the ablation group), compared to those who underwent pacemaker implantation in patients with TBS.

Conclusion

Catheter ablation resulted in a lower incidence of AF recurrence, stroke, and mortality compared to the pacemaker in TBS patients. There was no difference between groups regarding procedure-related complications and cardiovascular rehospitalization.

Abstract Image

心动过速-心动过缓综合征患者导管消融与永久性起搏器植入的临床结果比较:一项meta分析
心动过速-心动过缓综合征(TBS)是一种由病窦综合征(SSS)相关并发症引起的临床疾病。在SSS患者中,TBS以心动过速和心动过缓交替发作为特征。本荟萃分析旨在评估和比较消融和起搏器治疗TBS的临床结果差异。方法系统检索PubMed、EuropePMC、SCOPUS、Cochrane Central和medRxiv等图书馆的预印本研究。TBS患者起搏组和消融组之间的搜索词为“心动过速-心动过缓综合征”、“起搏”和“消融”。采用Review Manager Software Version 5.4 (Cochrane Collaboration)进行meta分析。结果我们从搜索中确定了1138篇潜在的文章,521篇重复的文章被删除。在筛选剩下的662篇文章的标题和摘要后,我们获得了23篇可能相关的文章。最后,我们将其余8项研究纳入定性综合和荟萃分析,共1266例患者。导管消融与房颤复发率较低相关(OR = 0.09 [0.04, 0.22;p & lt;0.001],具有中等异质性(I2 = 76%, p <;0.001)、中风(OR为0.28 [0.14,0.53;p & lt;低异质性I2 = 0%, p = 0.99,有利于消融组)和较低的死亡率(OR为0.37 [0.17,0.80;[p0.01]低异质性I2 = 0%, p = 0.84有利于消融组),与接受起搏器植入的TBS患者相比。结论与起搏器相比,导管消融导致房颤复发、卒中和死亡率降低。在手术相关并发症和心血管再住院方面,两组间无差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IJC Heart and Vasculature
IJC Heart and Vasculature Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
10.30%
发文量
216
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: IJC Heart & Vasculature is an online-only, open-access journal dedicated to publishing original articles and reviews (also Editorials and Letters to the Editor) which report on structural and functional cardiovascular pathology, with an emphasis on imaging and disease pathophysiology. Articles must be authentic, educational, clinically relevant, and original in their content and scientific approach. IJC Heart & Vasculature requires the highest standards of scientific integrity in order to promote reliable, reproducible and verifiable research findings. All authors are advised to consult the Principles of Ethical Publishing in the International Journal of Cardiology before submitting a manuscript. Submission of a manuscript to this journal gives the publisher the right to publish that paper if it is accepted. Manuscripts may be edited to improve clarity and expression.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信