Improving a microbial risk assessment tool with direct feedback from school health staff

IF 4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Mehedi Hasan , Megan Peterson , Emily K. Waldron , Nathan L. Mottern , Nicole T. Pargas , Lynn B. Gerald , Ashley A. Lowe , Amanda M. Wilson
{"title":"Improving a microbial risk assessment tool with direct feedback from school health staff","authors":"Mehedi Hasan ,&nbsp;Megan Peterson ,&nbsp;Emily K. Waldron ,&nbsp;Nathan L. Mottern ,&nbsp;Nicole T. Pargas ,&nbsp;Lynn B. Gerald ,&nbsp;Ashley A. Lowe ,&nbsp;Amanda M. Wilson","doi":"10.1016/j.mran.2025.100352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Due to the impact of COVID-19, publicly available risk-based tools are becoming increasingly popular. However, subject experts develop most of these tools without consulting end users. Thus, this study aimed to explore users' perceptions, vision, and guidance for microbial risk assessment tool development through focus groups. This tool was intended to assist school health staff in decision-making regarding school respiratory viral outbreaks. Partnering with a school district in the Tucson metropolitan area, we conducted three focus groups with school health staff to gather feedback on a risk tool prototype. We discussed the staff’s vision for the tool, their feedback on tool capabilities and design, and how they could leverage tool output for informing decisions, advocating with administration, or educating parents, students, or staff. Focus groups were conducted at the district health office, and the transcripts were analyzed by two researchers using inductively informed themes. Thematic analysis revealed that a comprehensive microbial risk assessment tool must have the potential to manage large amounts of data, scope for incorporation of existing data management systems, have real-time data processing, and produce context-specific recommendations for advocacy. Risk tools can expand personalized risk assessment and management strategies. Directly engaging users will advance microbial risk assessment impact and implementation. In the context of schools, a collaborative, comprehensive, digital and real time microbial risk assessment tool is a timely demand by the school health staff to manage microbial risks.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48593,"journal":{"name":"Microbial Risk Analysis","volume":"30 ","pages":"Article 100352"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbial Risk Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235235222500012X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to the impact of COVID-19, publicly available risk-based tools are becoming increasingly popular. However, subject experts develop most of these tools without consulting end users. Thus, this study aimed to explore users' perceptions, vision, and guidance for microbial risk assessment tool development through focus groups. This tool was intended to assist school health staff in decision-making regarding school respiratory viral outbreaks. Partnering with a school district in the Tucson metropolitan area, we conducted three focus groups with school health staff to gather feedback on a risk tool prototype. We discussed the staff’s vision for the tool, their feedback on tool capabilities and design, and how they could leverage tool output for informing decisions, advocating with administration, or educating parents, students, or staff. Focus groups were conducted at the district health office, and the transcripts were analyzed by two researchers using inductively informed themes. Thematic analysis revealed that a comprehensive microbial risk assessment tool must have the potential to manage large amounts of data, scope for incorporation of existing data management systems, have real-time data processing, and produce context-specific recommendations for advocacy. Risk tools can expand personalized risk assessment and management strategies. Directly engaging users will advance microbial risk assessment impact and implementation. In the context of schools, a collaborative, comprehensive, digital and real time microbial risk assessment tool is a timely demand by the school health staff to manage microbial risks.

Abstract Image

根据学校卫生人员的直接反馈,改进微生物风险评估工具
由于COVID-19的影响,公开的基于风险的工具越来越受欢迎。然而,学科专家在开发这些工具时没有咨询最终用户。因此,本研究旨在通过焦点小组探讨用户对微生物风险评估工具开发的看法、愿景和指导。该工具旨在协助学校卫生工作人员就学校呼吸道病毒暴发作出决策。我们与图森市区的一个学区合作,与学校卫生工作人员进行了三个焦点小组讨论,以收集对风险工具原型的反馈。我们讨论了员工对工具的愿景,他们对工具功能和设计的反馈,以及他们如何利用工具输出来通知决策,与管理部门一起倡导,或者教育家长、学生或员工。在地区卫生办公室进行了焦点小组研究,两名研究人员使用归纳性信息主题对记录进行了分析。专题分析表明,综合微生物风险评估工具必须具有管理大量数据的潜力、纳入现有数据管理系统的范围、具有实时数据处理能力,并针对具体情况提出宣传建议。风险工具可以扩展个性化的风险评估和管理策略。直接参与用户将促进微生物风险评估的影响和实施。在学校环境下,协同、全面、数字化、实时的微生物风险评估工具是学校卫生工作人员对微生物风险管理的及时需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Microbial Risk Analysis
Microbial Risk Analysis Medicine-Microbiology (medical)
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
28
审稿时长
52 days
期刊介绍: The journal Microbial Risk Analysis accepts articles dealing with the study of risk analysis applied to microbial hazards. Manuscripts should at least cover any of the components of risk assessment (risk characterization, exposure assessment, etc.), risk management and/or risk communication in any microbiology field (clinical, environmental, food, veterinary, etc.). This journal also accepts article dealing with predictive microbiology, quantitative microbial ecology, mathematical modeling, risk studies applied to microbial ecology, quantitative microbiology for epidemiological studies, statistical methods applied to microbiology, and laws and regulatory policies aimed at lessening the risk of microbial hazards. Work focusing on risk studies of viruses, parasites, microbial toxins, antimicrobial resistant organisms, genetically modified organisms (GMOs), and recombinant DNA products are also acceptable.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信