Carbon Capture and Storage for Small-to-Medium Biorefineries: Promising Carbon Removal Solution with Economic Challenges

IF 8.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Mengyao Yuan,  and , Wenqin Li*, 
{"title":"Carbon Capture and Storage for Small-to-Medium Biorefineries: Promising Carbon Removal Solution with Economic Challenges","authors":"Mengyao Yuan,&nbsp; and ,&nbsp;Wenqin Li*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.estlett.5c00312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Carbon capture and storage (CCS) integrated with biomass-based fuel production can provide cost-effective biomass carbon removal and storage (BiCRS) and produce high-value bioproducts, such as sustainable aviation fuels. To accelerate BiCRS deployment, it is crucial to quantify the costs of CCS integration, particularly for small- and medium-scale biorefineries that are representative of early-stage deployment. Existing studies tend to focus on plant sizes that are orders-of-magnitude larger than early-stage installations, possibly underestimating CCS costs for small-to-medium biorefineries. We show that the capture, transport, and storage costs to maximize CO<sub>2</sub> removal from a 526 dry tonne per day (tpd) biomass gasification plant (largest existing size) could be 13–47% higher than costs for a typical modeled plant size (2000 dry tpd). The higher cost estimates are driven by less favorable economies of scale and realistic assumptions about the availability of affordable CO<sub>2</sub> transport infrastructure with both drivers broadly applicable to other BiCRS technologies. Compliance and voluntary carbon markets could incentivize biorefinery CCS, but both carry a high degree of uncertainty. These findings highlight that sufficient and reliable financial mechanisms would be essential to unlocking the full CO<sub>2</sub> removal potential of biorefineries and facilitating BiCRS scale-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":37,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Technology Letters Environ.","volume":"12 8","pages":"945–950"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Technology Letters Environ.","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.estlett.5c00312","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) integrated with biomass-based fuel production can provide cost-effective biomass carbon removal and storage (BiCRS) and produce high-value bioproducts, such as sustainable aviation fuels. To accelerate BiCRS deployment, it is crucial to quantify the costs of CCS integration, particularly for small- and medium-scale biorefineries that are representative of early-stage deployment. Existing studies tend to focus on plant sizes that are orders-of-magnitude larger than early-stage installations, possibly underestimating CCS costs for small-to-medium biorefineries. We show that the capture, transport, and storage costs to maximize CO2 removal from a 526 dry tonne per day (tpd) biomass gasification plant (largest existing size) could be 13–47% higher than costs for a typical modeled plant size (2000 dry tpd). The higher cost estimates are driven by less favorable economies of scale and realistic assumptions about the availability of affordable CO2 transport infrastructure with both drivers broadly applicable to other BiCRS technologies. Compliance and voluntary carbon markets could incentivize biorefinery CCS, but both carry a high degree of uncertainty. These findings highlight that sufficient and reliable financial mechanisms would be essential to unlocking the full CO2 removal potential of biorefineries and facilitating BiCRS scale-up.

Abstract Image

中小型生物精炼厂的碳捕获和储存:有前途的碳去除解决方案与经济挑战
碳捕获与封存(CCS)与生物质燃料生产相结合,可以提供具有成本效益的生物质碳去除与封存(BiCRS),并生产高价值的生物产品,如可持续航空燃料。为了加速BiCRS的部署,量化CCS集成的成本至关重要,特别是对于处于早期部署阶段的中小型生物精炼厂。现有的研究往往集中在比早期装置大几个数量级的工厂规模上,可能低估了中小型生物精炼厂的CCS成本。我们表明,从一个526干吨/天(tpd)的生物质气化工厂(现有最大规模)中最大限度地去除二氧化碳的捕获、运输和储存成本可能比典型的模拟工厂规模(2000干吨/天)的成本高出13-47%。较高的成本估计是由规模经济不太有利和对可负担得起的二氧化碳运输基础设施的可用性的现实假设驱动的,这两个驱动因素广泛适用于其他BiCRS技术。合规和自愿碳市场可以激励生物炼制CCS,但两者都具有高度的不确定性。这些发现强调,充分和可靠的金融机制对于释放生物精炼厂的全部二氧化碳去除潜力和促进BiCRS的扩大至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Science & Technology Letters Environ.
Environmental Science & Technology Letters Environ. ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTALENVIRONMENTAL SC-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
3.70%
发文量
163
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Technology Letters serves as an international forum for brief communications on experimental or theoretical results of exceptional timeliness in all aspects of environmental science, both pure and applied. Published as soon as accepted, these communications are summarized in monthly issues. Additionally, the journal features short reviews on emerging topics in environmental science and technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信