Kajung Hong,Nicholas M Morelli,Dalia R Tabibian,Michelle G Jimenez,David Straub,Miguel T Villodas
{"title":"Systematic Review of Parent-Youth Discrepancies in Exposures to Community Violence.","authors":"Kajung Hong,Nicholas M Morelli,Dalia R Tabibian,Michelle G Jimenez,David Straub,Miguel T Villodas","doi":"10.1007/s10567-025-00532-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Past studies have consistently found that different informants disagree on ratings of youth's experiences. For instance, parents and youth report different prevalence and frequency ratings of youth's exposure to community violence (ECV), with past studies demonstrating that parents typically underreport youth's ECV compared to the youth. However, recent studies with advanced statistical analyses revealed more nuanced patterns of reports, with some parents overreporting their youth's ECV, some underreporting it, and other parent-youth dyads agreeing that the youth either did or did not experience ECV. These report patterns are theorized to provide valuable insight into parent-child relationships and family functioning and have implications for youth emotional and behavioral development. The current systematic review synthesized 14 existing studies (N = 12,824 parent-youth dyads) on parent-youth discrepancies in youth ECV to elucidate patterns of informant discrepancies and their correlates to parent-youth relationship quality, family functioning, and youth outcomes. Studies that used advanced analytic approaches (k = 2), such as latent class analysis and polynomial regression, identified multiple patterns of parent-youth reports (e.g., parent-youth agreement on either low or high levels of youth ECV, parental underreporting, parental overreporting compared to youth). Poor parent-youth relationship and family functioning (e.g., lower parental warmth, higher parental hostility) were associated with higher parent-youth discrepancies in youth ECV. There were mixed findings with patterns of informant discrepancies in youth ECV and youth functioning. Suggestions for future directions for research on parent-youth discrepancies in youth ECV were made.","PeriodicalId":51399,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-025-00532-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Past studies have consistently found that different informants disagree on ratings of youth's experiences. For instance, parents and youth report different prevalence and frequency ratings of youth's exposure to community violence (ECV), with past studies demonstrating that parents typically underreport youth's ECV compared to the youth. However, recent studies with advanced statistical analyses revealed more nuanced patterns of reports, with some parents overreporting their youth's ECV, some underreporting it, and other parent-youth dyads agreeing that the youth either did or did not experience ECV. These report patterns are theorized to provide valuable insight into parent-child relationships and family functioning and have implications for youth emotional and behavioral development. The current systematic review synthesized 14 existing studies (N = 12,824 parent-youth dyads) on parent-youth discrepancies in youth ECV to elucidate patterns of informant discrepancies and their correlates to parent-youth relationship quality, family functioning, and youth outcomes. Studies that used advanced analytic approaches (k = 2), such as latent class analysis and polynomial regression, identified multiple patterns of parent-youth reports (e.g., parent-youth agreement on either low or high levels of youth ECV, parental underreporting, parental overreporting compared to youth). Poor parent-youth relationship and family functioning (e.g., lower parental warmth, higher parental hostility) were associated with higher parent-youth discrepancies in youth ECV. There were mixed findings with patterns of informant discrepancies in youth ECV and youth functioning. Suggestions for future directions for research on parent-youth discrepancies in youth ECV were made.
期刊介绍:
Editors-in-Chief: Dr. Ronald J. Prinz, University of South Carolina and Dr. Thomas H. Ollendick, Virginia Polytechnic Institute Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that provides an international, interdisciplinary forum in which important and new developments in this field are identified and in-depth reviews on current thought and practices are published. The Journal publishes original research reviews, conceptual and theoretical papers, and related work in the broad area of the behavioral sciences that pertains to infants, children, adolescents, and families. Contributions originate from a wide array of disciplines including, but not limited to, psychology (e.g., clinical, community, developmental, family, school), medicine (e.g., family practice, pediatrics, psychiatry), public health, social work, and education. Topical content includes science and application and covers facets of etiology, assessment, description, treatment and intervention, prevention, methodology, and public policy. Submissions are by invitation only and undergo peer review. The Editors, in consultation with the Editorial Board, invite highly qualified experts to contribute original papers on topics of timely interest and significance.