Efficacy of venous supercharged reverse sural artery flap for reconstruction of severe limb trauma: comparative study including high-risk patients.

IF 2
Takashi Kageyama, Hokuto Morii, Tsubasa Takahashi, Yasuhisa Ueda, Koichi Inokuchi
{"title":"Efficacy of venous supercharged reverse sural artery flap for reconstruction of severe limb trauma: comparative study including high-risk patients.","authors":"Takashi Kageyama, Hokuto Morii, Tsubasa Takahashi, Yasuhisa Ueda, Koichi Inokuchi","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The reverse sural artery flap (RSAF) was reported to be a less technically demanding method for the coverage of defects in the distal lower leg, which can be elevated with short operative times. However, several studies pointed out the high frequency of partial necrosis in patients with comorbidities, which was primarily attributed to inadequate venous drainage. To overcome this challenge, we hypothesized that venous supercharging could effectively alleviate congestion of RSAF, potentially minimizing partial necrosis and related complications not only in healthy patients but also in comorbid patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective observational study was conducted. We reviewed patients with severe limb trauma who underwent RSAF for soft tissue defects on the distal lower legs, ankles, and feet from 2009 to 2022. All flaps were performed within 2 months of the injuries. Patients were divided into the Supercharge group and the Control group based on the presence of supercharge. The flap necrosis, major and minor complications, and nonunion were compared between the two groups. Additionally, these outcomes were also evaluated among high-risk patients with at least one comorbidity, including diabetes mellitus, peripheral arterial disease, venous insufficiency, advanced age over 50 years, or history of smoking.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 30 patients including 16 males met the criteria, with 9 cases in the Supercharge group and 21 cases in the Control group. The Supercharge group decreased the frequencies of overall necrosis (11 % vs 71 %) as well as wound dehiscence (22 % vs 67 %). The Supercharge group also exhibited a relatively lower frequency of major complications (0 % vs 29 %) and minor complications (0 % vs 33 %) compared to the Control group. Among 21 high-risk patients with 7 supercharged cases and 14 control cases, supercharging decreased overall necrosis (14 % vs 71 %) and relatively suppressed major and minor complications (both of them: 0 % vs 36 %).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Venous supercharging of RSAF decreased the overall necrosis, potentially enhancing its clinical utility even in high-risk patients. Supercharged RSAF can be a valuable option as initial flap reconstruction for traumatic distal limb defects.</p>","PeriodicalId":94042,"journal":{"name":"Injury","volume":" ","pages":"112631"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2025.112631","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The reverse sural artery flap (RSAF) was reported to be a less technically demanding method for the coverage of defects in the distal lower leg, which can be elevated with short operative times. However, several studies pointed out the high frequency of partial necrosis in patients with comorbidities, which was primarily attributed to inadequate venous drainage. To overcome this challenge, we hypothesized that venous supercharging could effectively alleviate congestion of RSAF, potentially minimizing partial necrosis and related complications not only in healthy patients but also in comorbid patients.

Methods: A single-center retrospective observational study was conducted. We reviewed patients with severe limb trauma who underwent RSAF for soft tissue defects on the distal lower legs, ankles, and feet from 2009 to 2022. All flaps were performed within 2 months of the injuries. Patients were divided into the Supercharge group and the Control group based on the presence of supercharge. The flap necrosis, major and minor complications, and nonunion were compared between the two groups. Additionally, these outcomes were also evaluated among high-risk patients with at least one comorbidity, including diabetes mellitus, peripheral arterial disease, venous insufficiency, advanced age over 50 years, or history of smoking.

Results: A total of 30 patients including 16 males met the criteria, with 9 cases in the Supercharge group and 21 cases in the Control group. The Supercharge group decreased the frequencies of overall necrosis (11 % vs 71 %) as well as wound dehiscence (22 % vs 67 %). The Supercharge group also exhibited a relatively lower frequency of major complications (0 % vs 29 %) and minor complications (0 % vs 33 %) compared to the Control group. Among 21 high-risk patients with 7 supercharged cases and 14 control cases, supercharging decreased overall necrosis (14 % vs 71 %) and relatively suppressed major and minor complications (both of them: 0 % vs 36 %).

Conclusion: Venous supercharging of RSAF decreased the overall necrosis, potentially enhancing its clinical utility even in high-risk patients. Supercharged RSAF can be a valuable option as initial flap reconstruction for traumatic distal limb defects.

静脉增压腓肠反动脉皮瓣重建严重肢体创伤的疗效:包括高危患者的对比研究。
背景:据报道,腓肠逆动脉皮瓣(RSAF)是一种技术要求较低的方法,用于覆盖小腿远端缺损,可以在短手术时间内提升。然而,一些研究指出,部分坏死在合并症患者中发生的频率很高,这主要归因于静脉引流不足。为了克服这一挑战,我们假设静脉增压可以有效缓解RSAF充血,潜在地减少健康患者和合并症患者的部分坏死和相关并发症。方法:采用单中心回顾性观察研究。我们回顾了2009年至2022年间因下肢远端、脚踝和足部软组织缺损而接受RSAF的严重肢体创伤患者。所有皮瓣均在伤后2个月内完成。根据有无增压情况将患者分为增压组和对照组。比较两组皮瓣坏死、大小并发症及不愈合情况。此外,这些结果也在至少有一种合并症的高危患者中进行了评估,包括糖尿病、外周动脉疾病、静脉功能不全、50岁以上高龄或吸烟史。结果:30例患者符合标准,其中男性16例,增压组9例,对照组21例。增压组降低了整体坏死的频率(11%比71%)和伤口裂开的频率(22%比67%)。与对照组相比,增压组也表现出相对较低的主要并发症发生率(0%对29%)和轻微并发症发生率(0%对33%)。在21例高危患者中,增压组7例,对照组14例,增压组总体坏死减少(14%比71%),并相对抑制了轻重并发症(均为0%比36%)。结论:RSAF静脉增压可减少整体坏死,即使在高危患者中也可能提高其临床应用价值。增压RSAF可作为创伤性远端肢体缺损的初始皮瓣重建的有价值的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信