Maria L. Tang , Ian S. McFarlane , Christopher E. Overton , Erjola Hani , Vanessa Saliba , Gareth J. Hughes , Paul Crook , Thomas Ward , Jonathon Mellor
{"title":"Nowcasting cases and trends during the measles 2023/24 outbreak in England","authors":"Maria L. Tang , Ian S. McFarlane , Christopher E. Overton , Erjola Hani , Vanessa Saliba , Gareth J. Hughes , Paul Crook , Thomas Ward , Jonathon Mellor","doi":"10.1016/j.jinf.2025.106569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>In 2023/24, England had its largest measles outbreak in a decade. Lags from symptom onset to test results made laboratory-confirmed case data inherently retrospective rather than real-time. Reporting lags varied by measles prevalence and testing purpose. Nowcasting models can predict future backfilling of reported cases and estimate recent trends.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We developed a generalised additive model accounting for reporting delays, location, and day-of-week effects in line-list data by symptom onset date. The model was re-fit weekly providing real-time nowcasts and directional trends for national and regional users. Retrospectively, we tested alternative specifications to optimise structure and confirm predictive performance, evaluating with log weighted interval score (WIS) and ranked probability score (RPS).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>For national case estimates, the operational and retrospective models outperformed the baseline model, reducing daily log WIS by 42% and 41%, respectively. For four-week trends, the operational and retrospective models provided better national estimates than the baseline, reducing RPS by 69% and 6%, respectively. An alternative model indexed by report date sometimes outperformed others for trend direction but lagged trend changes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our work highlights the value of real-time nowcasting during outbreaks to inform fast-evolving trends, and early access to accurate reporting delay data for effective modelling.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Infection","volume":"91 3","pages":"Article 106569"},"PeriodicalIF":11.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016344532500163X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives
In 2023/24, England had its largest measles outbreak in a decade. Lags from symptom onset to test results made laboratory-confirmed case data inherently retrospective rather than real-time. Reporting lags varied by measles prevalence and testing purpose. Nowcasting models can predict future backfilling of reported cases and estimate recent trends.
Methods
We developed a generalised additive model accounting for reporting delays, location, and day-of-week effects in line-list data by symptom onset date. The model was re-fit weekly providing real-time nowcasts and directional trends for national and regional users. Retrospectively, we tested alternative specifications to optimise structure and confirm predictive performance, evaluating with log weighted interval score (WIS) and ranked probability score (RPS).
Results
For national case estimates, the operational and retrospective models outperformed the baseline model, reducing daily log WIS by 42% and 41%, respectively. For four-week trends, the operational and retrospective models provided better national estimates than the baseline, reducing RPS by 69% and 6%, respectively. An alternative model indexed by report date sometimes outperformed others for trend direction but lagged trend changes.
Conclusions
Our work highlights the value of real-time nowcasting during outbreaks to inform fast-evolving trends, and early access to accurate reporting delay data for effective modelling.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Infection publishes original papers on all aspects of infection - clinical, microbiological and epidemiological. The Journal seeks to bring together knowledge from all specialties involved in infection research and clinical practice, and present the best work in the ever-changing field of infection.
Each issue brings you Editorials that describe current or controversial topics of interest, high quality Reviews to keep you in touch with the latest developments in specific fields of interest, an Epidemiology section reporting studies in the hospital and the general community, and a lively correspondence section.