{"title":"Teletherapy Matters - Mental health and materialities of care in domestic more-than-digital assemblages.","authors":"Marjo Kolehmainen, Deborah Lupton","doi":"10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Teletherapy involves the coming together of humans and nonhuman agents to accomplish a therapeutic encounter. This article presents novel insights into the ways in which the absence or presence of different creatures, spaces and objects, both digital and non-digital, contribute to psychological therapies at a distance. Building on contributions from more-than-human theory, science and technology studies (STS) and the sociology of health, we identify these beings and things as active and co-constitutive of therapeutic care. Empirically, our analysis draws on in-depth interviews with 39 Finnish therapy and counselling professionals conducted after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, when they turned from in-office appointments to teletherapy during periods of stay-at-home and social distancing public health orders. The professionals conducted remote therapy from their own homes while their clients engaged with them from their own domestic settings. Findings show that in particular, these professionals saw the home setting (both their own and that of their clients) as an important component in these heterogeneous more-than-digital assemblages of care. In some cases, therapeutic capacities were opened by these assemblages. However in other situations, opportunities for professionals to provide support were closed by the distractions and affective atmospheres of the domestic settings in which both professionals and their clients were attempting to enact a successful therapeutic encounter.</p>","PeriodicalId":49122,"journal":{"name":"Social Science & Medicine","volume":"383 ","pages":"118418"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118418","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Teletherapy involves the coming together of humans and nonhuman agents to accomplish a therapeutic encounter. This article presents novel insights into the ways in which the absence or presence of different creatures, spaces and objects, both digital and non-digital, contribute to psychological therapies at a distance. Building on contributions from more-than-human theory, science and technology studies (STS) and the sociology of health, we identify these beings and things as active and co-constitutive of therapeutic care. Empirically, our analysis draws on in-depth interviews with 39 Finnish therapy and counselling professionals conducted after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, when they turned from in-office appointments to teletherapy during periods of stay-at-home and social distancing public health orders. The professionals conducted remote therapy from their own homes while their clients engaged with them from their own domestic settings. Findings show that in particular, these professionals saw the home setting (both their own and that of their clients) as an important component in these heterogeneous more-than-digital assemblages of care. In some cases, therapeutic capacities were opened by these assemblages. However in other situations, opportunities for professionals to provide support were closed by the distractions and affective atmospheres of the domestic settings in which both professionals and their clients were attempting to enact a successful therapeutic encounter.
期刊介绍:
Social Science & Medicine provides an international and interdisciplinary forum for the dissemination of social science research on health. We publish original research articles (both empirical and theoretical), reviews, position papers and commentaries on health issues, to inform current research, policy and practice in all areas of common interest to social scientists, health practitioners, and policy makers. The journal publishes material relevant to any aspect of health from a wide range of social science disciplines (anthropology, economics, epidemiology, geography, policy, psychology, and sociology), and material relevant to the social sciences from any of the professions concerned with physical and mental health, health care, clinical practice, and health policy and organization. We encourage material which is of general interest to an international readership.