Effect of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Kasra Shokri, Azin Karimian, Azar Radfar, Abbas Mohammadi, Atefeh Amerizadeh, Raheleh Karimi, Masoumeh Sadeghi
{"title":"Effect of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Kasra Shokri, Azin Karimian, Azar Radfar, Abbas Mohammadi, Atefeh Amerizadeh, Raheleh Karimi, Masoumeh Sadeghi","doi":"10.1186/s13102-025-01270-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) poses a significant threat to cardiovascular health. This study evaluates the effects of structured exercise cardiac rehabilitation (CR) both center-based and home-based on incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and 6 min Walk Test (6MWT) in ACS patients.A systematic literature search was conducted across major databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCT) published from 2000 to March 2024. Random-effects model was applied for meta-analysis. Cochran's Q and I<sup>2</sup> values were applied to determine heterogeneity, followed by subgroup analyses for exploring sources of heterogeneity. Sensitivity and publication bias analyses were performed.Ten RCTs showed that rehabilitation significantly reduced the odds of MACE compared to usual care (OR: 0.16, 95% CI: 0.07-0.38; p = 0.00). In terms of type of rehabilitation, center-based CR had a lower odd of MACE (OR: 0.13) than home-based CR (OR: 0.37), though the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.24). In terms of follow-up duration, studies with ≤ 1 year follow-up reported lower MACE odds (OR: 0.10) compared to those > 1 year (OR: 0.28), also not statistically significant (p = 0.33). For functional capacity, analysis of seven studies showed that rehabilitation significantly improved 6MWT performance. Exercise-based rehabilitation led to an average increase of 86.24 m, Home-based rehabilitation showed a smaller gain of 37.63 m, with a significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.04).This meta-analysis provides strong evidence that CR, particularly structured exercise-based programs, significantly reduces the risk of MACE and improves functional capacity in patients with cardiovascular disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":48585,"journal":{"name":"BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"17 1","pages":"233"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12335772/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-025-01270-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) poses a significant threat to cardiovascular health. This study evaluates the effects of structured exercise cardiac rehabilitation (CR) both center-based and home-based on incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and 6 min Walk Test (6MWT) in ACS patients.A systematic literature search was conducted across major databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCT) published from 2000 to March 2024. Random-effects model was applied for meta-analysis. Cochran's Q and I2 values were applied to determine heterogeneity, followed by subgroup analyses for exploring sources of heterogeneity. Sensitivity and publication bias analyses were performed.Ten RCTs showed that rehabilitation significantly reduced the odds of MACE compared to usual care (OR: 0.16, 95% CI: 0.07-0.38; p = 0.00). In terms of type of rehabilitation, center-based CR had a lower odd of MACE (OR: 0.13) than home-based CR (OR: 0.37), though the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.24). In terms of follow-up duration, studies with ≤ 1 year follow-up reported lower MACE odds (OR: 0.10) compared to those > 1 year (OR: 0.28), also not statistically significant (p = 0.33). For functional capacity, analysis of seven studies showed that rehabilitation significantly improved 6MWT performance. Exercise-based rehabilitation led to an average increase of 86.24 m, Home-based rehabilitation showed a smaller gain of 37.63 m, with a significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.04).This meta-analysis provides strong evidence that CR, particularly structured exercise-based programs, significantly reduces the risk of MACE and improves functional capacity in patients with cardiovascular disease.

基于运动的心脏康复对急性冠脉综合征患者的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
急性冠脉综合征(ACS)严重威胁心血管健康。本研究评估了基于中心和基于家庭的结构化运动心脏康复(CR)对ACS患者主要不良心血管事件(MACE)发生率和6分钟步行试验(6MWT)的影响。系统检索各大数据库,检索2000年至2024年3月发表的随机对照试验(RCT)。采用随机效应模型进行meta分析。采用Cochran’s Q和I2值来确定异质性,然后进行亚组分析以探索异质性的来源。进行敏感性和发表偏倚分析。10项随机对照试验显示,与常规护理相比,康复显著降低了MACE的发生率(OR: 0.16, 95% CI: 0.07-0.38;p = 0.00)。在康复类型方面,中心CR的MACE奇数值(OR: 0.13)低于家庭CR (OR: 0.37),差异无统计学意义(p = 0.24)。在随访时间方面,≤1年的研究报告的MACE几率(OR: 0.10)低于≤1年的研究(OR: 0.28),也无统计学意义(p = 0.33)。在功能能力方面,对7项研究的分析表明,康复显著提高了6MWT的表现。运动康复平均增加86.24 m,居家康复平均增加37.63 m,两组差异有统计学意义(p = 0.04)。这项荟萃分析提供了强有力的证据,证明CR,特别是有组织的基于运动的项目,可以显著降低心血管疾病患者MACE的风险并改善其功能能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation
BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
196
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation is an open access, peer reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of sports medicine and the exercise sciences, including rehabilitation, traumatology, cardiology, physiology, and nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信