Automated detection of quiet eye durations in archery using electrooculography and comparative deep learning models.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Fatma Söğüt, Hüseyin Yanık, Evren Değirmenci, İnci Kesilmiş, Ülkü Çömelekoğlu
{"title":"Automated detection of quiet eye durations in archery using electrooculography and comparative deep learning models.","authors":"Fatma Söğüt, Hüseyin Yanık, Evren Değirmenci, İnci Kesilmiş, Ülkü Çömelekoğlu","doi":"10.1186/s13102-025-01284-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study presents a deep learning-based approach for the automated detection of Quiet Eye (QE) durations from electrooculography (EOG) signals in archery. QE-the final fixation or tracking of the gaze before executing a motor action-is a critical factor in precision sports. Traditional detection methods, which rely on expert evaluations, are inherently subjective, time-consuming, and inconsistent. To overcome these limitations, EOG data were collected from 10 licensed archers during controlled shooting sessions and preprocessed using a wavelet transform and a Butterworth bandpass filter for noise reduction. We implemented and compared a traditional model (SVM) and five deep learning models-CNN + LSTM, CNN + GRU, Transformer, UNet, and 1D CNN-for QE detection. The CNN + LSTM model achieved the highest accuracy (95%), followed closely by CNN + GRU (93%), demonstrating superior performance in capturing both spatial and temporal dependencies in the EOG signals. Although Transformer-based and UNet models performed competitively, they exhibited lower precision in distinguishing QE periods. The performance of the traditional model was inferior to deep learning approaches. These results indicate that deep learning provides an effective and scalable solution for objective QE analysis, substantially reducing the dependence on expert annotations. This automated approach can enhance sports training by offering real-time, data-driven feedback to athletes and coaches. Furthermore, the methodology holds promise for broader applications in cognitive and motor skill assessments across various domains. Future work will focus on expanding the dataset, enabling real-time deployment, and evaluating model generalizability across different skill levels and sports disciplines.</p>","PeriodicalId":48585,"journal":{"name":"BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":"17 1","pages":"234"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12335783/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-025-01284-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents a deep learning-based approach for the automated detection of Quiet Eye (QE) durations from electrooculography (EOG) signals in archery. QE-the final fixation or tracking of the gaze before executing a motor action-is a critical factor in precision sports. Traditional detection methods, which rely on expert evaluations, are inherently subjective, time-consuming, and inconsistent. To overcome these limitations, EOG data were collected from 10 licensed archers during controlled shooting sessions and preprocessed using a wavelet transform and a Butterworth bandpass filter for noise reduction. We implemented and compared a traditional model (SVM) and five deep learning models-CNN + LSTM, CNN + GRU, Transformer, UNet, and 1D CNN-for QE detection. The CNN + LSTM model achieved the highest accuracy (95%), followed closely by CNN + GRU (93%), demonstrating superior performance in capturing both spatial and temporal dependencies in the EOG signals. Although Transformer-based and UNet models performed competitively, they exhibited lower precision in distinguishing QE periods. The performance of the traditional model was inferior to deep learning approaches. These results indicate that deep learning provides an effective and scalable solution for objective QE analysis, substantially reducing the dependence on expert annotations. This automated approach can enhance sports training by offering real-time, data-driven feedback to athletes and coaches. Furthermore, the methodology holds promise for broader applications in cognitive and motor skill assessments across various domains. Future work will focus on expanding the dataset, enabling real-time deployment, and evaluating model generalizability across different skill levels and sports disciplines.

使用眼电成像和比较深度学习模型自动检测射箭中的静眼持续时间。
本研究提出了一种基于深度学习的方法,用于从眼电图(EOG)信号中自动检测静眼(QE)持续时间。qe——在执行一个运动动作之前最后的注视或追踪——是精确运动的一个关键因素。传统的检测方法依赖于专家评估,具有固有的主观性、耗时和不一致性。为了克服这些限制,研究人员收集了10名持证弓箭手在受控射击期间的EOG数据,并使用小波变换和巴特沃斯带通滤波器进行预处理,以降低噪声。我们实现并比较了传统模型(SVM)和五种深度学习模型(CNN + LSTM, CNN + GRU, Transformer, UNet和1D CNN)用于QE检测。CNN + LSTM模型获得了最高的准确率(95%),紧随其后的是CNN + GRU(93%),在捕捉EOG信号的空间和时间依赖性方面表现优异。尽管基于变压器和UNet模型的表现具有竞争力,但它们在区分QE时期时表现出较低的精度。传统模型的性能不如深度学习方法。这些结果表明,深度学习为客观QE分析提供了一种有效且可扩展的解决方案,大大降低了对专家注释的依赖。这种自动化的方法可以通过向运动员和教练提供实时的、数据驱动的反馈来增强运动训练。此外,该方法有望在各个领域的认知和运动技能评估中得到更广泛的应用。未来的工作将侧重于扩展数据集,实现实时部署,并评估模型在不同技能水平和运动学科中的通用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation
BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
196
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation is an open access, peer reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of sports medicine and the exercise sciences, including rehabilitation, traumatology, cardiology, physiology, and nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信