{"title":"Prevalence and clinical profile of non-strabismic binocular vision anomalies in the Nepalese population: A hospital-based study.","authors":"Santosh Chhetri, Rupesh Poudel, Srijana Adhikari, Umesh Belbase, Mario Cantó-Cerdán, Manish Poudel, Suraj Thapa","doi":"10.1016/j.optom.2025.100575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify the prevalence of non-strabismic binocular vision anomalies in a systematically randomized sample of symptomatic, non-presbyopic subjects from a tertiary hospital, using a broader range of diagnostics signs.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>The study was designed as hospital-based, cross-sectional, and analytical and was conducted from March 2022 to April 2023. Systematic random sampling was employed to select the subjects. Symptomatic subjects aged between 18 and 35 years with best-corrected visual acuity of 6/6 in each eye and no change in refractive error during the subjective refraction were included in the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of the 231 subjects examined, 91 (39.39 %) were found to have non strabismic binocular vision anomalies. Of all the non strabismic binocular vision anomalies, 60 subjects (26 %) had binocular dysfunctions, 22 (9.5 %) had accommodative dysfunctions, and 9 (3.9 %) had both accommodative and binocular dysfunctions. The most common dysfunction was convergence insufficiency (18.2 %), followed by accommodative infacility (6.06 %) and fusional vergence dysfunction (3.9 %). The most prevalent symptom was headache (16.7 %), followed by visual fatigue (14.1 %).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Two-fifths of the symptomatic subjects have non strabismic binocular vision anomalies. It is essential to assess all accommodative and binocular parameters in order to arrive at a diagnosis of non strabismic binocular vision anomalies.</p>","PeriodicalId":46407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Optometry","volume":"18 4","pages":"100575"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12355990/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2025.100575","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To identify the prevalence of non-strabismic binocular vision anomalies in a systematically randomized sample of symptomatic, non-presbyopic subjects from a tertiary hospital, using a broader range of diagnostics signs.
Subjects and methods: The study was designed as hospital-based, cross-sectional, and analytical and was conducted from March 2022 to April 2023. Systematic random sampling was employed to select the subjects. Symptomatic subjects aged between 18 and 35 years with best-corrected visual acuity of 6/6 in each eye and no change in refractive error during the subjective refraction were included in the study.
Results: Out of the 231 subjects examined, 91 (39.39 %) were found to have non strabismic binocular vision anomalies. Of all the non strabismic binocular vision anomalies, 60 subjects (26 %) had binocular dysfunctions, 22 (9.5 %) had accommodative dysfunctions, and 9 (3.9 %) had both accommodative and binocular dysfunctions. The most common dysfunction was convergence insufficiency (18.2 %), followed by accommodative infacility (6.06 %) and fusional vergence dysfunction (3.9 %). The most prevalent symptom was headache (16.7 %), followed by visual fatigue (14.1 %).
Conclusion: Two-fifths of the symptomatic subjects have non strabismic binocular vision anomalies. It is essential to assess all accommodative and binocular parameters in order to arrive at a diagnosis of non strabismic binocular vision anomalies.