Barriers and enablers of research engagement among multidisciplinary cancer care professionals in Ireland: A mixed-methods study

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Amanda Drury , Christopher Crockford
{"title":"Barriers and enablers of research engagement among multidisciplinary cancer care professionals in Ireland: A mixed-methods study","authors":"Amanda Drury ,&nbsp;Christopher Crockford","doi":"10.1016/j.jcpo.2025.100630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale</h3><div>Nurses and health and social care professionals (HSCPs) are integral to multidisciplinary cancer care and are well-positioned to engage in research that enhances patient outcomes. However, unlike medical professionals, non-medical clinicians often face substantial barriers to research engagement, including limited institutional support, time constraints, and lack of research training and mentorship.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To explore the barriers and enablers to research activity among nurses and HSCPs working in clinical cancer care settings in Ireland.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A mixed methods design was used. Phase 1 consisted of a stakeholder consultation workshop (n = 14) to qualitatively identify research barriers and enablers. Phase 2 involved a cross-sectional questionnaire (n = 157) assessing participants’ research capacity, activity, and influencing factors using the Research Capacity and Culture (RCC) tool and additional study-specific items.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Key barriers identified included lack of protected research time (64.3 %), funding (65.0 %) and resourcing/support (64.3 %). Participants reported moderate individual research skills, particularly in literature review and data collection, but lower confidence in research leadership activities, including grant writing, budgeting, and protocol development. Despite barriers, 73.9 % of participants expressed interest in research activities, especially in data collection, analysis, and project leadership. Access to academic-clinical partnerships, supportive management, and training opportunities were cited as critical enablers.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There is significant untapped potential for research engagement among non-medical cancer care professionals in Ireland. Organizational investment in protected research time, mentorship, and targeted training is essential to build research capacity, support clinician-led research, and improve outcomes for patients and healthcare systems alike.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Policy","volume":"45 ","pages":"Article 100630"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213538325000748","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale

Nurses and health and social care professionals (HSCPs) are integral to multidisciplinary cancer care and are well-positioned to engage in research that enhances patient outcomes. However, unlike medical professionals, non-medical clinicians often face substantial barriers to research engagement, including limited institutional support, time constraints, and lack of research training and mentorship.

Aim

To explore the barriers and enablers to research activity among nurses and HSCPs working in clinical cancer care settings in Ireland.

Methods

A mixed methods design was used. Phase 1 consisted of a stakeholder consultation workshop (n = 14) to qualitatively identify research barriers and enablers. Phase 2 involved a cross-sectional questionnaire (n = 157) assessing participants’ research capacity, activity, and influencing factors using the Research Capacity and Culture (RCC) tool and additional study-specific items.

Results

Key barriers identified included lack of protected research time (64.3 %), funding (65.0 %) and resourcing/support (64.3 %). Participants reported moderate individual research skills, particularly in literature review and data collection, but lower confidence in research leadership activities, including grant writing, budgeting, and protocol development. Despite barriers, 73.9 % of participants expressed interest in research activities, especially in data collection, analysis, and project leadership. Access to academic-clinical partnerships, supportive management, and training opportunities were cited as critical enablers.

Conclusions

There is significant untapped potential for research engagement among non-medical cancer care professionals in Ireland. Organizational investment in protected research time, mentorship, and targeted training is essential to build research capacity, support clinician-led research, and improve outcomes for patients and healthcare systems alike.
爱尔兰多学科癌症护理专业人员研究参与的障碍和促成因素:一项混合方法研究。
理由:护士和健康与社会护理专业人员(hscp)是多学科癌症护理不可或缺的组成部分,并且能够很好地参与提高患者预后的研究。然而,与医疗专业人员不同,非医疗临床医生在参与研究方面往往面临重大障碍,包括有限的机构支持、时间限制以及缺乏研究培训和指导。目的:探讨障碍和使能者之间的研究活动护士和hscp工作在临床癌症护理设置在爱尔兰。方法:采用混合方法设计。第一阶段包括一个利益相关者咨询研讨会(n=14),以定性地确定研究障碍和推动因素。第二阶段采用横断面问卷(n=157)评估参与者的研究能力、活动和影响因素,使用研究能力和文化(RCC)工具和其他研究特定项目。结果:确定的主要障碍包括缺乏受保护的研究时间(64.3%)、资金(65.0%)和指导。参与者报告了一般的个人研究技能,特别是在文献综述和数据收集方面,但在拨款写作、预算编制和方案制定方面的信心较低。尽管存在障碍,73.9%的参与者表示对研究活动感兴趣,特别是在数据收集、分析和项目领导方面。获得学术-临床合作伙伴关系、支持性管理和培训机会被认为是关键的促成因素。结论:在爱尔兰的非医疗癌症护理专业人员中,研究参与具有重要的未开发潜力。组织在受保护的研究时间、指导和有针对性的培训方面的投资对于建立研究能力、支持临床医生主导的研究以及改善患者和医疗保健系统的结果至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer Policy
Journal of Cancer Policy Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
47
审稿时长
65 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信