Comparison of outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer in patients with diabetes: Results from the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Surgery Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-09 DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2025.109597
Chih-Jung Chen, Hsin-Yuan Hung
{"title":"Comparison of outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer in patients with diabetes: Results from the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample.","authors":"Chih-Jung Chen, Hsin-Yuan Hung","doi":"10.1016/j.surg.2025.109597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetes mellitus is a prevalent comorbid condition with colon cancer and may significantly impact surgical outcomes. This study aims to compare the postoperative outcomes between robotic-assisted right hemicolectomy and laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for right-side colon cancer in patients with co-existing diabetes mellitus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from Nationwide Inpatient Sample were analyzed retrospectively. Adult patients ≥20 years with diabetes mellitus who underwent either robotic-assisted right hemicolectomy or laparoscopic right hemicolectomy were included. Outcomes included in-hospital mortality, length of stay, total hospital costs, nonroutine discharge, major complications, and rates of conversion to open surgery. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to compare the outcomes between robotic-assisted right hemicolectomy and laparoscopic right hemicolectomy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8,273 patients were included, with 1,119 undergoing robotic-assisted right hemicolectomy and 7,154 undergoing laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Robotic-assisted right hemicolectomy was associated with shorter length of stay (adjusted beta, -0.86; 95% confidence interval, -0.89 to -0.83, P < .001), a lower risk of major complications (adjusted odds ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-0.96, P = .016), but greater total hospital costs (adjusted beta, 30.64; 95% confidence interval, 30.00-30.66, P < .001) compared with laparoscopic right hemicolectomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Robotic-assisted right hemicolectomy offers significant advantages over laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for diabetic patients undergoing right hemicolectomy for colon cancer, including shorter hospital stays and lower rates of major complications. Despite greater total hospital costs, the improved short-term outcomes suggest that robotic-assisted right hemicolectomy is a safer and more effective surgical option for this patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":22152,"journal":{"name":"Surgery","volume":"186 ","pages":"109597"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2025.109597","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diabetes mellitus is a prevalent comorbid condition with colon cancer and may significantly impact surgical outcomes. This study aims to compare the postoperative outcomes between robotic-assisted right hemicolectomy and laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for right-side colon cancer in patients with co-existing diabetes mellitus.

Methods: Data from Nationwide Inpatient Sample were analyzed retrospectively. Adult patients ≥20 years with diabetes mellitus who underwent either robotic-assisted right hemicolectomy or laparoscopic right hemicolectomy were included. Outcomes included in-hospital mortality, length of stay, total hospital costs, nonroutine discharge, major complications, and rates of conversion to open surgery. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to compare the outcomes between robotic-assisted right hemicolectomy and laparoscopic right hemicolectomy.

Results: A total of 8,273 patients were included, with 1,119 undergoing robotic-assisted right hemicolectomy and 7,154 undergoing laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Robotic-assisted right hemicolectomy was associated with shorter length of stay (adjusted beta, -0.86; 95% confidence interval, -0.89 to -0.83, P < .001), a lower risk of major complications (adjusted odds ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-0.96, P = .016), but greater total hospital costs (adjusted beta, 30.64; 95% confidence interval, 30.00-30.66, P < .001) compared with laparoscopic right hemicolectomy.

Conclusion: Robotic-assisted right hemicolectomy offers significant advantages over laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for diabetic patients undergoing right hemicolectomy for colon cancer, including shorter hospital stays and lower rates of major complications. Despite greater total hospital costs, the improved short-term outcomes suggest that robotic-assisted right hemicolectomy is a safer and more effective surgical option for this patient population.

机器人和腹腔镜右半结肠切除术治疗糖尿病患者结肠癌的效果比较:来自美国全国住院患者样本的结果。
背景:糖尿病是结肠癌的常见合并症,并可能显著影响手术结果。本研究旨在比较机器人辅助右半结肠切除术和腹腔镜右半结肠切除术治疗合并糖尿病的右侧结肠癌患者的术后效果。方法:对全国住院患者资料进行回顾性分析。≥20岁的糖尿病患者接受机器人辅助右半结肠切除术或腹腔镜右半结肠切除术。结果包括住院死亡率、住院时间、总住院费用、非常规出院、主要并发症和转为开放手术的比率。采用单变量和多变量logistic回归分析比较机器人辅助右半结肠切除术和腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的结果。结果:共纳入8273例患者,其中1119例接受机器人辅助右半结肠切除术,7154例接受腹腔镜右半结肠切除术。机器人辅助右半结肠切除术与较短的住院时间相关(校正β值,-0.86;95%可信区间,-0.89 ~ -0.83,P < 0.001),主要并发症的风险较低(调整优势比,0.80;95%可信区间为0.67-0.96,P = 0.016),但总医院费用较高(调整贝塔系数为30.64;95%可信区间,30.00-30.66,P < .001)。结论:与腹腔镜右半结肠切除术相比,机器人辅助右半结肠切除术对接受结肠癌右半结肠切除术的糖尿病患者具有显著优势,包括住院时间短、主要并发症发生率低。尽管总住院费用更高,但改善的短期结果表明,机器人辅助右半结肠切除术对这类患者是一种更安全、更有效的手术选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Surgery
Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
687
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: For 66 years, Surgery has published practical, authoritative information about procedures, clinical advances, and major trends shaping general surgery. Each issue features original scientific contributions and clinical reports. Peer-reviewed articles cover topics in oncology, trauma, gastrointestinal, vascular, and transplantation surgery. The journal also publishes papers from the meetings of its sponsoring societies, the Society of University Surgeons, the Central Surgical Association, and the American Association of Endocrine Surgeons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信