Real-time cerebral oximetry and outcomes during out-of-hospital resuscitation

IF 4.6 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Jenny Shin , Julia King , Robert Walker , Dana Yost , Jennifer Blackwood , Jason Coult , Fred Chapman , Robert W. Neumar , Peter Kudenchuk , Thomas Rea
{"title":"Real-time cerebral oximetry and outcomes during out-of-hospital resuscitation","authors":"Jenny Shin ,&nbsp;Julia King ,&nbsp;Robert Walker ,&nbsp;Dana Yost ,&nbsp;Jennifer Blackwood ,&nbsp;Jason Coult ,&nbsp;Fred Chapman ,&nbsp;Robert W. Neumar ,&nbsp;Peter Kudenchuk ,&nbsp;Thomas Rea","doi":"10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Anoxic brain injury is a common mode of death following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). We assessed the course of regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO<sub>2</sub>) during resuscitation to understand its association with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and functional survival.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a prospective observational investigation of OHCA patients treated by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) in a suburban community. Real-time rSO<sub>2</sub> was characterized overall and according to ROSC and favorable survival defined by Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) 1–2. We also calculated ΔrSO<sub>2</sub>, defined as the change in rSO<sub>2</sub> from pre- to post-ROSC among those who achieved ROSC, and compared to a time-matched rSO<sub>2</sub> difference among those receiving CPR who did not achieve ROSC.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 140 eligible cases, 93 were enrolled. Of these, 55 % (<em>n</em> = 51) achieved ROSC and 10 % (<em>n</em> = 9) survived with CPC 1–2. Upon cerebral oximeter application, the median rSO<sub>2</sub> was 33 % (interquartile range = 22.45 %). Initial rSO<sub>2</sub> did not predict subsequent ROSC (38 % ROSC vs 27 % no ROSC, AUC = 0.61, <em>p</em> = 0.13) or subsequent favorable survival (45 % CPC 1–2 vs 32 % no survival with CPC 1–2, AUC = 0.77, <em>p</em> = 0.17). However, real-time rSO<sub>2</sub> and ΔrSO<sub>2</sub> were greater upon ROSC versus time-matched ongoing pulselessness (rSO<sub>2</sub> = 60 % vs. 33 %, AUC = 0.84, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001; ΔrSO<sub>2</sub> = 11 % vs. 1 %, AUC = 0.85, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Among those who achieved ROSC, rSO<sub>2</sub> and ΔrSO<sub>2</sub> during the <em>peri</em>-ROSC period was greater among those with subsequent favorable survival (rSO<sub>2</sub> = 63 % vs. 46 %, AUC = 0.74, <em>p</em> = 0.06; ΔrSO<sub>2</sub> = 29 % vs. 10 %, AUC = 0.77, <em>p</em> = 0.04)</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Greater values of rSO<sub>2</sub> and ΔrSO<sub>2</sub> identified instantaneous ROSC and predicted favorable neurological survival among those who achieved ROSC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21052,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation","volume":"215 ","pages":"Article 110761"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300957225002734","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Anoxic brain injury is a common mode of death following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). We assessed the course of regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2) during resuscitation to understand its association with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and functional survival.

Methods

We conducted a prospective observational investigation of OHCA patients treated by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) in a suburban community. Real-time rSO2 was characterized overall and according to ROSC and favorable survival defined by Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) 1–2. We also calculated ΔrSO2, defined as the change in rSO2 from pre- to post-ROSC among those who achieved ROSC, and compared to a time-matched rSO2 difference among those receiving CPR who did not achieve ROSC.

Results

Of 140 eligible cases, 93 were enrolled. Of these, 55 % (n = 51) achieved ROSC and 10 % (n = 9) survived with CPC 1–2. Upon cerebral oximeter application, the median rSO2 was 33 % (interquartile range = 22.45 %). Initial rSO2 did not predict subsequent ROSC (38 % ROSC vs 27 % no ROSC, AUC = 0.61, p = 0.13) or subsequent favorable survival (45 % CPC 1–2 vs 32 % no survival with CPC 1–2, AUC = 0.77, p = 0.17). However, real-time rSO2 and ΔrSO2 were greater upon ROSC versus time-matched ongoing pulselessness (rSO2 = 60 % vs. 33 %, AUC = 0.84, p < 0.001; ΔrSO2 = 11 % vs. 1 %, AUC = 0.85, p < 0.001). Among those who achieved ROSC, rSO2 and ΔrSO2 during the peri-ROSC period was greater among those with subsequent favorable survival (rSO2 = 63 % vs. 46 %, AUC = 0.74, p = 0.06; ΔrSO2 = 29 % vs. 10 %, AUC = 0.77, p = 0.04)

Conclusion

Greater values of rSO2 and ΔrSO2 identified instantaneous ROSC and predicted favorable neurological survival among those who achieved ROSC.
院外复苏期间实时脑血氧测定与预后。
背景:缺氧脑损伤是院外心脏骤停(OHCA)后常见的死亡模式。我们评估了复苏过程中区域脑氧饱和度(rSO2)的变化过程,以了解其与自发循环恢复(ROSC)和功能生存的关系。方法:我们对郊区社区急诊医疗服务(EMS)治疗的OHCA患者进行前瞻性观察调查。实时rSO2根据ROSC和脑功能分类(CPC) 1-2定义的有利生存进行总体表征。我们还计算了ΔrSO2,定义为实现ROSC的患者从ROSC前到ROSC后的rSO2变化,并与接受CPR但未实现ROSC的患者的rSO2时间匹配差异进行了比较。结果:在140例符合条件的病例中,有93例入选。其中,55% (n=51)达到ROSC, 10% (n=9)在CPC 1-2下存活。应用脑血氧仪后,rSO2中位数为33%(四分位数范围=22,45%)。初始rSO2不能预测随后的ROSC (38% ROSC vs 27%无ROSC, AUC=0.61, p=0.13)或随后的有利生存(45% CPC 1-2 vs 32% CPC 1-2无生存,AUC=0.77, p=0.17)。然而,与时间匹配的持续无脉搏相比,ROSC患者的实时rSO2和ΔrSO2更高(rSO2=60% vs. 33%, AUC=0.84, p2=11% vs. 1%, AUC=0.85, p2和ΔrSO2在ROSC周围生存期更高(rSO2=63% vs. 46%, AUC=0.74, p=0.06;ΔrSO2=29% vs. 10%, AUC=0.77, p=0.04)结论:较高的rSO2和ΔrSO2值可识别瞬时ROSC,并预测获得ROSC的患者良好的神经系统生存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resuscitation
Resuscitation 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
18.50%
发文量
556
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Resuscitation is a monthly international and interdisciplinary medical journal. The papers published deal with the aetiology, pathophysiology and prevention of cardiac arrest, resuscitation training, clinical resuscitation, and experimental resuscitation research, although papers relating to animal studies will be published only if they are of exceptional interest and related directly to clinical cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Papers relating to trauma are published occasionally but the majority of these concern traumatic cardiac arrest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信