{"title":"The effect of elastic deformation and rigid displacement soft tissue artefact on glenohumeral axial rotation.","authors":"Martin B Warner, Markus O Heller","doi":"10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Measurement of axial rotation of the humerus using marker-based motion capture is compromised due to soft tissue artefact. The aim of this study was to quantify the elastic deformation of markers on the humerus and evaluate the combined effects of elastic deformation and rigid displacement of the markers on humeral kinematics during axial rotation. Thirteen wheelchair users performed active humeral internal rotation whilst a Vicon motion capture system tracked 12 retro-reflective markers placed on the arm. Elastic deformation was quantified using the Optimal Common Shape Technique (OCST) and Ordinary Procrustes Analysis (OPA). The combined effects of elastic deformation and rigid marker displacement were quantified by comparing kinematics derived from only the humeral markers to the kinematics derived using the forearm segment (benchmark measurement). Elastic deformation of the markers demonstrated a systematic variation in the deformation pattern across the arm where the proximal markers lagged and the distal markers proceeded the OPA fitted reference shape of the marker cluster. There was a significant 48.7° underestimation in the range of axial rotation (P < 0.001). A secondary analysis was performed utilising only the distal arm markers on the humerus. The underestimation in axial rotation range of motion reduced to 25.9° and was not significantly different to the benchmark measurement from neutral through to internal rotation. Systematic elastic deformation of markers was present across the upper limb segment that adversely affected the estimation of humeral axial rotation. Careful selection of marker position for the arm cluster is needed minimise the effect of soft tissue artefact.</p>","PeriodicalId":15168,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biomechanics","volume":"191 ","pages":"112893"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2025.112893","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Measurement of axial rotation of the humerus using marker-based motion capture is compromised due to soft tissue artefact. The aim of this study was to quantify the elastic deformation of markers on the humerus and evaluate the combined effects of elastic deformation and rigid displacement of the markers on humeral kinematics during axial rotation. Thirteen wheelchair users performed active humeral internal rotation whilst a Vicon motion capture system tracked 12 retro-reflective markers placed on the arm. Elastic deformation was quantified using the Optimal Common Shape Technique (OCST) and Ordinary Procrustes Analysis (OPA). The combined effects of elastic deformation and rigid marker displacement were quantified by comparing kinematics derived from only the humeral markers to the kinematics derived using the forearm segment (benchmark measurement). Elastic deformation of the markers demonstrated a systematic variation in the deformation pattern across the arm where the proximal markers lagged and the distal markers proceeded the OPA fitted reference shape of the marker cluster. There was a significant 48.7° underestimation in the range of axial rotation (P < 0.001). A secondary analysis was performed utilising only the distal arm markers on the humerus. The underestimation in axial rotation range of motion reduced to 25.9° and was not significantly different to the benchmark measurement from neutral through to internal rotation. Systematic elastic deformation of markers was present across the upper limb segment that adversely affected the estimation of humeral axial rotation. Careful selection of marker position for the arm cluster is needed minimise the effect of soft tissue artefact.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomechanics publishes reports of original and substantial findings using the principles of mechanics to explore biological problems. Analytical, as well as experimental papers may be submitted, and the journal accepts original articles, surveys and perspective articles (usually by Editorial invitation only), book reviews and letters to the Editor. The criteria for acceptance of manuscripts include excellence, novelty, significance, clarity, conciseness and interest to the readership.
Papers published in the journal may cover a wide range of topics in biomechanics, including, but not limited to:
-Fundamental Topics - Biomechanics of the musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, and respiratory systems, mechanics of hard and soft tissues, biofluid mechanics, mechanics of prostheses and implant-tissue interfaces, mechanics of cells.
-Cardiovascular and Respiratory Biomechanics - Mechanics of blood-flow, air-flow, mechanics of the soft tissues, flow-tissue or flow-prosthesis interactions.
-Cell Biomechanics - Biomechanic analyses of cells, membranes and sub-cellular structures; the relationship of the mechanical environment to cell and tissue response.
-Dental Biomechanics - Design and analysis of dental tissues and prostheses, mechanics of chewing.
-Functional Tissue Engineering - The role of biomechanical factors in engineered tissue replacements and regenerative medicine.
-Injury Biomechanics - Mechanics of impact and trauma, dynamics of man-machine interaction.
-Molecular Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of biomolecules.
-Orthopedic Biomechanics - Mechanics of fracture and fracture fixation, mechanics of implants and implant fixation, mechanics of bones and joints, wear of natural and artificial joints.
-Rehabilitation Biomechanics - Analyses of gait, mechanics of prosthetics and orthotics.
-Sports Biomechanics - Mechanical analyses of sports performance.