Efficacy of three good things intervention for enhancing exclusive breastfeeding behaviors: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of affective disorders Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-07 DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2025.120020
Ying Xie, Kechen Xu, Xueyan Han, Ying Yu, Bo Zhu, Jinghua Zhang, Xiujun Han, Qian Yang
{"title":"Efficacy of three good things intervention for enhancing exclusive breastfeeding behaviors: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Ying Xie, Kechen Xu, Xueyan Han, Ying Yu, Bo Zhu, Jinghua Zhang, Xiujun Han, Qian Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2025.120020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emotional factors have been linked to breastfeeding behaviors, while evidence remains limited on the efficacy of positive psychology interventions in promoting breastfeeding. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of \"Three Good Things\" intervention on breastfeeding.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A parallel, two-arm, single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted in 2022 at a Women's Hospital in China. First-time pregnant women aged >18 years with 34-38 gestational weeks were included. Participants were stratified by family support for breastfeeding and randomly assigned to \"Three Good Things\" intervention group or \"First Three Things\" control group. The primary outcome was exclusive breastfeeding during postnatal hospitalization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 297 participants (141 in intervention and 156 in control group) completed the study. Intention-to-treat analysis using generalized linear models indicated no significant differences in emotional outcomes between two groups. Logistic regression analysis revealed comparable proportion of exclusive breastfeeding (16.3 % vs. 19.9 %, P = 0.43). Notably, higher levels of positive emotions were associated with higher breastfeeding behavior scores (β = 0.046, SE = 0.015, P = 0.002). Among individuals with high levels of positive emotions, higher scores on positive emotion were associated with an increased likelihood of exclusive breastfeeding.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While the \"Three Good Things\" intervention did not directly enhance exclusive breastfeeding behaviors, our findings suggested that higher level of positive emotions was associated with higher potential of exclusive breastfeeding and better breastfeeding practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":" ","pages":"120020"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2025.120020","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Emotional factors have been linked to breastfeeding behaviors, while evidence remains limited on the efficacy of positive psychology interventions in promoting breastfeeding. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of "Three Good Things" intervention on breastfeeding.

Methods: A parallel, two-arm, single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted in 2022 at a Women's Hospital in China. First-time pregnant women aged >18 years with 34-38 gestational weeks were included. Participants were stratified by family support for breastfeeding and randomly assigned to "Three Good Things" intervention group or "First Three Things" control group. The primary outcome was exclusive breastfeeding during postnatal hospitalization.

Results: A total of 297 participants (141 in intervention and 156 in control group) completed the study. Intention-to-treat analysis using generalized linear models indicated no significant differences in emotional outcomes between two groups. Logistic regression analysis revealed comparable proportion of exclusive breastfeeding (16.3 % vs. 19.9 %, P = 0.43). Notably, higher levels of positive emotions were associated with higher breastfeeding behavior scores (β = 0.046, SE = 0.015, P = 0.002). Among individuals with high levels of positive emotions, higher scores on positive emotion were associated with an increased likelihood of exclusive breastfeeding.

Conclusions: While the "Three Good Things" intervention did not directly enhance exclusive breastfeeding behaviors, our findings suggested that higher level of positive emotions was associated with higher potential of exclusive breastfeeding and better breastfeeding practices.

三件好事干预提高纯母乳喂养行为的效果:一项随机对照试验。
背景:情绪因素与母乳喂养行为有关,而积极心理学干预对促进母乳喂养的有效性的证据仍然有限。本研究旨在评估“三好”干预母乳喂养的效果。方法:于2022年在中国某妇女医院进行一项平行、双臂、单盲随机对照试验。首次怀孕的女性年龄为bbb18 岁,孕周34-38周。根据家庭对母乳喂养的支持程度进行分层,随机分为“三件好事”干预组和“前三件事”对照组。主要结局是产后住院期间纯母乳喂养。结果:共有297名参与者(干预组141名,对照组156名)完成了研究。使用广义线性模型的意向治疗分析显示,两组之间的情绪结果无显著差异。Logistic回归分析显示纯母乳喂养比例相当(16.3 % vs. 19.9 %,P = 0.43)。值得注意的是,积极情绪水平越高,母乳喂养行为得分越高(β = 0.046,SE = 0.015,P = 0.002)。在积极情绪水平高的个体中,积极情绪得分越高,纯母乳喂养的可能性越大。结论:虽然“三好”干预并不能直接提高纯母乳喂养行为,但我们的研究结果表明,高水平的积极情绪与高水平的纯母乳喂养和更好的母乳喂养行为有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of affective disorders
Journal of affective disorders 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1319
审稿时长
9.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信