The predictive utility of the E-PASS score for postoperative complications in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Cagatay Ozsoy, Erhan Ates, Resat Inal, Mucahit Gelmis, Sahin Kilic, Mutlu Ates
{"title":"The predictive utility of the E-PASS score for postoperative complications in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Cagatay Ozsoy, Erhan Ates, Resat Inal, Mucahit Gelmis, Sahin Kilic, Mutlu Ates","doi":"10.1186/s12894-025-01899-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is widely used for small renal tumors and provides favorable oncological and functional outcomes. However, a significant risk of postoperative complications remains a concern. Existing nephrometry scores focus on tumor anatomy but neglect patient-specific and intraoperative factors. The Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) score, originally developed for gastrointestinal surgery, combines physiological and surgical parameters for the prediction of postoperative risk. This study evaluates the predictive performance of the E-PASS score in RAPN.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational study retrospectively analyzed 166 patients who underwent RAPN between March 2015 and September 2024. The preoperative risk score (PRS), surgical stress score (SSS), and comprehensive risk score (CRS) were calculated. Complications developing within 30 days were classified using the Clavien-Dindo system, with Grade 2 or higher events being considered significant. The performance of the CRS in predicting postoperative complications was evaluated via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, while model calibration was assessed by means of a calibration plot. Logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of postoperative complication risk. Bootstrap resampling was used to estimate 95% confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Grade 2 or higher complications occurred in 26 patients (15.7%). CRS was significantly greater in the complication group (p < 0.001). ROC analysis demonstrated good discrimination (AUC: 0.721; 95% CI: 0.629-0.812). A CRS cut-off of 0.083 yielded 76.8% sensitivity and 59.5% specificity. The calibration plot indicated good agreement between predicted and observed probabilities. Multivariate analysis identified CRS (OR: 1.537, p = 0.044), tumor size (OR: 1.048, p = 0.020), and off-clamp surgery (OR: 4.569, p = 0.003) as independent predictors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>E-PASS CRS reliably predicts postoperative complications in RAPN and enhances risk stratification by incorporating patient-specific surgical factors. Its integration may assist more personalized perioperative management in urological surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":9285,"journal":{"name":"BMC Urology","volume":"25 1","pages":"197"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12335025/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-025-01899-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is widely used for small renal tumors and provides favorable oncological and functional outcomes. However, a significant risk of postoperative complications remains a concern. Existing nephrometry scores focus on tumor anatomy but neglect patient-specific and intraoperative factors. The Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) score, originally developed for gastrointestinal surgery, combines physiological and surgical parameters for the prediction of postoperative risk. This study evaluates the predictive performance of the E-PASS score in RAPN.

Methods: This observational study retrospectively analyzed 166 patients who underwent RAPN between March 2015 and September 2024. The preoperative risk score (PRS), surgical stress score (SSS), and comprehensive risk score (CRS) were calculated. Complications developing within 30 days were classified using the Clavien-Dindo system, with Grade 2 or higher events being considered significant. The performance of the CRS in predicting postoperative complications was evaluated via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, while model calibration was assessed by means of a calibration plot. Logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of postoperative complication risk. Bootstrap resampling was used to estimate 95% confidence intervals.

Results: Grade 2 or higher complications occurred in 26 patients (15.7%). CRS was significantly greater in the complication group (p < 0.001). ROC analysis demonstrated good discrimination (AUC: 0.721; 95% CI: 0.629-0.812). A CRS cut-off of 0.083 yielded 76.8% sensitivity and 59.5% specificity. The calibration plot indicated good agreement between predicted and observed probabilities. Multivariate analysis identified CRS (OR: 1.537, p = 0.044), tumor size (OR: 1.048, p = 0.020), and off-clamp surgery (OR: 4.569, p = 0.003) as independent predictors.

Conclusions: E-PASS CRS reliably predicts postoperative complications in RAPN and enhances risk stratification by incorporating patient-specific surgical factors. Its integration may assist more personalized perioperative management in urological surgery.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

E-PASS评分对机器人辅助部分肾切除术术后并发症的预测效用:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:机器人辅助部分肾切除术(RAPN)广泛用于小肾肿瘤,具有良好的肿瘤和功能预后。然而,术后并发症的风险仍然令人担忧。现有的肾测量评分侧重于肿瘤解剖,但忽视了患者特异性和术中因素。生理能力和手术压力评估(E-PASS)评分最初是为胃肠道手术开发的,它结合了生理和手术参数来预测术后风险。本研究评估了E-PASS评分在RAPN中的预测性能。方法:本观察性研究回顾性分析了2015年3月至2024年9月期间接受RAPN治疗的166例患者。计算术前风险评分(PRS)、手术应激评分(SSS)和综合风险评分(CRS)。使用Clavien-Dindo系统对30天内发生的并发症进行分类,2级或以上的事件被认为是严重的。通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析评估CRS预测术后并发症的性能,通过校准图评估模型校准。采用Logistic回归确定术后并发症风险的独立预测因素。用Bootstrap重采样估计95%置信区间。结果:2级及以上并发症26例(15.7%)。结论:E-PASS CRS可靠地预测RAPN术后并发症,并通过纳入患者特异性手术因素加强风险分层。其整合有助于泌尿外科围手术期更个性化的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Urology
BMC Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Urology is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of urological disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology. The journal considers manuscripts in the following broad subject-specific sections of urology: Endourology and technology Epidemiology and health outcomes Pediatric urology Pre-clinical and basic research Reconstructive urology Sexual function and fertility Urological imaging Urological oncology Voiding dysfunction Case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信