"The efficacy and safety of Atogepant for migraine prophylaxis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials".

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ayesha Shaukat, Laiba Shakeel, Rumaisa Riaz, Saad Ashraf, Aymar Akilimali
{"title":"\"The efficacy and safety of Atogepant for migraine prophylaxis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials\".","authors":"Ayesha Shaukat, Laiba Shakeel, Rumaisa Riaz, Saad Ashraf, Aymar Akilimali","doi":"10.1186/s12883-025-04350-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Migraine is a complex neurological disorder characterized by recurrent, disabling headaches and various sensory symptoms, affecting about 15% of the global population annually. It is the second most common neurological condition worldwide, causing significant disability. While current prophylactic treatments include beta-blockers, tricyclic antidepressants, anticonvulsants, and monoclonal antibodies targeting the CGRP pathway, not all patients respond adequately. Atogepant, an oral CGRP receptor antagonist, has emerged as a promising option for migraine prevention with improved tolerability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This meta-analysis follows PRISMA guidelines, involving a comprehensive search of Cochrane CENTRAL, PubMed/MEDLINE, and Google Scholar databases up to July 2024. Efficacy outcomes included mean monthly migraine days (MMDs), mean monthly headache days (MHDs), monthly acute medication use days and the percentage of patients with a ≥ 50% reduction in MMDs. Safety outcomes were measured by adverse events (AEs). Statistical analysis employed the Inverse Variance and Mantel-Haenszel random-effects models, with heterogeneity assessed using the I² index.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six RCTs with 4325 patients (3054 on Atogepant, 1271 on placebo) met the inclusion criteria. The combined analysis indicated a significant reduction in MMDs favoring Atogepant over placebo (SMD - 0.39, 95% CI: -0.45 to -0.33; p < 0.00001; I²=0%). Similarly, significant reductions were observed in MHDs, monthly acute medication use days, and the proportion of patients achieving a ≥ 50% reduction in MMDs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Atogepant is an effective and safe option for migraine prophylaxis, showing significant reductions in MMDs. Further extensive trials are recommended to assess the long-term efficacy, safety, and cost efficiency of Atogepant compared to other preventive medications.</p>","PeriodicalId":9170,"journal":{"name":"BMC Neurology","volume":"25 1","pages":"326"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12335800/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-025-04350-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Migraine is a complex neurological disorder characterized by recurrent, disabling headaches and various sensory symptoms, affecting about 15% of the global population annually. It is the second most common neurological condition worldwide, causing significant disability. While current prophylactic treatments include beta-blockers, tricyclic antidepressants, anticonvulsants, and monoclonal antibodies targeting the CGRP pathway, not all patients respond adequately. Atogepant, an oral CGRP receptor antagonist, has emerged as a promising option for migraine prevention with improved tolerability.

Methods: This meta-analysis follows PRISMA guidelines, involving a comprehensive search of Cochrane CENTRAL, PubMed/MEDLINE, and Google Scholar databases up to July 2024. Efficacy outcomes included mean monthly migraine days (MMDs), mean monthly headache days (MHDs), monthly acute medication use days and the percentage of patients with a ≥ 50% reduction in MMDs. Safety outcomes were measured by adverse events (AEs). Statistical analysis employed the Inverse Variance and Mantel-Haenszel random-effects models, with heterogeneity assessed using the I² index.

Results: Six RCTs with 4325 patients (3054 on Atogepant, 1271 on placebo) met the inclusion criteria. The combined analysis indicated a significant reduction in MMDs favoring Atogepant over placebo (SMD - 0.39, 95% CI: -0.45 to -0.33; p < 0.00001; I²=0%). Similarly, significant reductions were observed in MHDs, monthly acute medication use days, and the proportion of patients achieving a ≥ 50% reduction in MMDs.

Conclusion: Atogepant is an effective and safe option for migraine prophylaxis, showing significant reductions in MMDs. Further extensive trials are recommended to assess the long-term efficacy, safety, and cost efficiency of Atogepant compared to other preventive medications.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

阿托格坦预防偏头痛的有效性和安全性:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:偏头痛是一种复杂的神经系统疾病,以复发性、致残性头痛和各种感觉症状为特征,每年影响全球约15%的人口。它是世界上第二大最常见的神经系统疾病,导致严重的残疾。虽然目前的预防性治疗包括-受体阻滞剂、三环抗抑郁药、抗惊厥药和靶向CGRP通路的单克隆抗体,但并非所有患者都有充分的反应。atoggepant是一种口服CGRP受体拮抗剂,已成为一种有希望的偏头痛预防选择,其耐受性得到改善。方法:本荟萃分析遵循PRISMA指南,包括全面检索Cochrane CENTRAL、PubMed/MEDLINE和谷歌Scholar数据库,截止2024年7月。疗效指标包括平均每月偏头痛天数(MMDs)、平均每月头痛天数(MHDs)、每月急性用药天数和MMDs减少≥50%的患者百分比。安全性结果通过不良事件(ae)来衡量。统计分析采用逆方差和Mantel-Haenszel随机效应模型,使用I²指数评估异质性。结果:6项随机对照试验(rct)纳入了4325例患者(atgepant组3054例,安慰剂组1271例)。综合分析表明,与安慰剂相比,阿佐格剂显著降低了MMDs (SMD - 0.39, 95% CI: -0.45至-0.33;结论:atgepant是一种有效且安全的偏头痛预防选择,可显著降低MMDs。建议进一步进行广泛的试验,以评估与其他预防性药物相比,Atogepant的长期疗效、安全性和成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Neurology
BMC Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
428
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Neurology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of neurological disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信