Soil seed bank resilience after rangeland conversion: implications for restoring abandoned agricultural lands.

IF 8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Science of the Total Environment Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-08 DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.180209
Reza Erfanzadeh, Tahereh Sabetpour, Tayebeh Amini, Péter Török
{"title":"Soil seed bank resilience after rangeland conversion: implications for restoring abandoned agricultural lands.","authors":"Reza Erfanzadeh, Tahereh Sabetpour, Tayebeh Amini, Péter Török","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.180209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Soil seed banks (SSBs) are crucial for ecosystem recovery, but their resilience to land-use change in semi-arid systems remains poorly understood. In the Middle East, most rangelands have been subjected to intensive grazing for years (grazed rangeland, GR), while others have either been excluded from grazing (ungrazed rangeland, UR) or either converted into various agricultural land-use types, including wheat cropland (WL), legume cropland (LL), horticultural land or orchard (HL), and abandoned land (AL). We compared SSB composition and density across plant functional groups (annuals, perennials, forbs, and grasses) at 0-5 cm and 5-10 cm soil depths under varying land-use and grazing intensities. Results showed that cultivated lands had lower SSB densities for all functional groups compared to intact ungrazed rangelands. These differences were most pronounced in the upper soil layer, where the highest total SSB densities were recorded in UR and LL and lowest in WL and HL. Annual SSB densities were highest in UR and LL, lowest in WL. Perennial densities were low overall, being highest in UR and lowest in HL and GR. Overall, our findings suggest that the conversion of natural rangelands into agricultural lands leads to SSB depletion. Furthermore, intensive grazing in rangelands appears to exert a more pronounced negative impact on SSB than conversion to agricultural use. Abandoned lands, even several years after abandonment, showed critically depleted SSBs, revealing that passive recovery is unlikely and that SSB depletion severely hinders ecological restoration, emphasizing the need to integrate SSB assessments into restoration planning for land-use changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":422,"journal":{"name":"Science of the Total Environment","volume":"997 ","pages":"180209"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of the Total Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.180209","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil seed banks (SSBs) are crucial for ecosystem recovery, but their resilience to land-use change in semi-arid systems remains poorly understood. In the Middle East, most rangelands have been subjected to intensive grazing for years (grazed rangeland, GR), while others have either been excluded from grazing (ungrazed rangeland, UR) or either converted into various agricultural land-use types, including wheat cropland (WL), legume cropland (LL), horticultural land or orchard (HL), and abandoned land (AL). We compared SSB composition and density across plant functional groups (annuals, perennials, forbs, and grasses) at 0-5 cm and 5-10 cm soil depths under varying land-use and grazing intensities. Results showed that cultivated lands had lower SSB densities for all functional groups compared to intact ungrazed rangelands. These differences were most pronounced in the upper soil layer, where the highest total SSB densities were recorded in UR and LL and lowest in WL and HL. Annual SSB densities were highest in UR and LL, lowest in WL. Perennial densities were low overall, being highest in UR and lowest in HL and GR. Overall, our findings suggest that the conversion of natural rangelands into agricultural lands leads to SSB depletion. Furthermore, intensive grazing in rangelands appears to exert a more pronounced negative impact on SSB than conversion to agricultural use. Abandoned lands, even several years after abandonment, showed critically depleted SSBs, revealing that passive recovery is unlikely and that SSB depletion severely hinders ecological restoration, emphasizing the need to integrate SSB assessments into restoration planning for land-use changes.

牧地转换后土壤种子库恢复力:对废弃地恢复的启示。
土壤种子库(SSBs)对生态系统恢复至关重要,但它们对半干旱系统土地利用变化的适应能力仍知之甚少。在中东,大多数牧场多年来一直受到集约化放牧(放牧牧场,GR),而其他牧场要么被排除在放牧之外(未放牧牧场,UR),要么被转化为各种农业土地利用类型,包括小麦田(WL)、豆科作物田(LL)、园艺地或果园(HL)和撂荒地(AL)。在不同的土地利用和放牧强度下,我们比较了0-5 cm和5-10 cm土壤深度下植物功能类群(一年生、多年生、草本和禾本科)中SSB的组成和密度。结果表明:与未放牧的草地相比,耕地各功能群的SSB密度均较低;这些差异在上层土壤中最为明显,总SSB密度以UR和LL最高,WL和HL最低。年SSB密度在西部和西部最高,在西部最低。多年生密度总体上较低,高岭土最高,高岭土和高岭土最低。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,自然牧场向农用地的转变导致了SSB的枯竭。此外,牧场的集约放牧对森林资源的负面影响似乎比转为农业用途更明显。被遗弃的土地,即使在被遗弃几年后,也显示出严重的SSB枯竭,表明被动恢复是不可能的,SSB的枯竭严重阻碍了生态恢复,强调需要将SSB评估纳入土地利用变化的恢复规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science of the Total Environment
Science of the Total Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
10.20%
发文量
8726
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The Science of the Total Environment is an international journal dedicated to scientific research on the environment and its interaction with humanity. It covers a wide range of disciplines and seeks to publish innovative, hypothesis-driven, and impactful research that explores the entire environment, including the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere. The journal's updated Aims & Scope emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary environmental research with broad impact. Priority is given to studies that advance fundamental understanding and explore the interconnectedness of multiple environmental spheres. Field studies are preferred, while laboratory experiments must demonstrate significant methodological advancements or mechanistic insights with direct relevance to the environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信