{"title":"Study on Energy Evolution Law of Rocks With Different Lithologies and Sizes","authors":"Yanchun Yin, Zitong Gao, Zhigang Zhao, Shudong He, Liyuan Liu, Guoying Li","doi":"10.1002/ese3.70166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Investigating the actual patterns of energy accumulation and release in roof rock, particularly with varying stiffnesses in mining environments, is crucial. By conducting cyclic loading and unloading tests on rock samples of different lithologies, different sizes, and consistent stiffness, how lithology, size, and stiffness affect the evolution and distribution of rock energy were explored. Furthermore, the practical applications of stiffness theory in engineering contexts were discussed. This paper finds that, for samples of the same size but different lithologies, in loading, the rate of elastic energy growth accelerates with load and decreases with stiffness, whereas the peak proportion of elastic energy rises with stiffness. In unloading, lower stiffness leads to higher, prolonged elastic energy release. For samples of the same lithology but varying sizes, energy growth increases as stiffness decreases, with minimal peak proportion of elastic energy variation. In unloading, lower stiffness leads to higher, prolonged elastic energy release. Among samples with identical stiffness but different lithologies and sizes, little difference is seen in loading energy growth or unloading release rates, but elastic energy proportion varies mainly due to lithology. Higher Young's modulus and larger sizes result in greater elastic energy storage. Lab tests show that low-stiffness machines will cause dynamic damage to the coal specimen, whereas hard rocks are more prone to coal bursts due to higher energy storage and release compared to soft rocks. The main reason for the deviation between the two is that the energy storage capacity of hard rock is greater than that of soft rock, and the storage-release elastic energy of hard rock is greater than that of soft rock.</p>","PeriodicalId":11673,"journal":{"name":"Energy Science & Engineering","volume":"13 8","pages":"4199-4210"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ese3.70166","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Science & Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://scijournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ese3.70166","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Investigating the actual patterns of energy accumulation and release in roof rock, particularly with varying stiffnesses in mining environments, is crucial. By conducting cyclic loading and unloading tests on rock samples of different lithologies, different sizes, and consistent stiffness, how lithology, size, and stiffness affect the evolution and distribution of rock energy were explored. Furthermore, the practical applications of stiffness theory in engineering contexts were discussed. This paper finds that, for samples of the same size but different lithologies, in loading, the rate of elastic energy growth accelerates with load and decreases with stiffness, whereas the peak proportion of elastic energy rises with stiffness. In unloading, lower stiffness leads to higher, prolonged elastic energy release. For samples of the same lithology but varying sizes, energy growth increases as stiffness decreases, with minimal peak proportion of elastic energy variation. In unloading, lower stiffness leads to higher, prolonged elastic energy release. Among samples with identical stiffness but different lithologies and sizes, little difference is seen in loading energy growth or unloading release rates, but elastic energy proportion varies mainly due to lithology. Higher Young's modulus and larger sizes result in greater elastic energy storage. Lab tests show that low-stiffness machines will cause dynamic damage to the coal specimen, whereas hard rocks are more prone to coal bursts due to higher energy storage and release compared to soft rocks. The main reason for the deviation between the two is that the energy storage capacity of hard rock is greater than that of soft rock, and the storage-release elastic energy of hard rock is greater than that of soft rock.
期刊介绍:
Energy Science & Engineering is a peer reviewed, open access journal dedicated to fundamental and applied research on energy and supply and use. Published as a co-operative venture of Wiley and SCI (Society of Chemical Industry), the journal offers authors a fast route to publication and the ability to share their research with the widest possible audience of scientists, professionals and other interested people across the globe. Securing an affordable and low carbon energy supply is a critical challenge of the 21st century and the solutions will require collaboration between scientists and engineers worldwide. This new journal aims to facilitate collaboration and spark innovation in energy research and development. Due to the importance of this topic to society and economic development the journal will give priority to quality research papers that are accessible to a broad readership and discuss sustainable, state-of-the art approaches to shaping the future of energy. This multidisciplinary journal will appeal to all researchers and professionals working in any area of energy in academia, industry or government, including scientists, engineers, consultants, policy-makers, government officials, economists and corporate organisations.