Navigating Discharge From Early Intervention in Psychosis Services: A Qualitative Exploration of the Experiences of Service Users and Carers

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Michelle Rickett, Tom Kingstone, Veenu Gupta, David Shiers, Paul French, Belinda Lennox, Ed Penington, Ryan Williams, Isobel Hoppe, Carolyn A. Chew-Graham
{"title":"Navigating Discharge From Early Intervention in Psychosis Services: A Qualitative Exploration of the Experiences of Service Users and Carers","authors":"Michelle Rickett,&nbsp;Tom Kingstone,&nbsp;Veenu Gupta,&nbsp;David Shiers,&nbsp;Paul French,&nbsp;Belinda Lennox,&nbsp;Ed Penington,&nbsp;Ryan Williams,&nbsp;Isobel Hoppe,&nbsp;Carolyn A. Chew-Graham","doi":"10.1111/hex.70375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) services in England offer up to 3 years' time-limited support to people experiencing early psychosis. Service users (SUs) are discharged to primary care, a community mental health team (CMHT), or other specialist mental health service. The aim of this study is to explore the SU and carer journey through discharge from EIP and into the early post-discharge period.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Qualitative longitudinal study comprising semi-structured interviews with SUs and carers at, or shortly after, discharge from EIP, and follow-up interviews with SUs 6-11 months later. Data collection conducted between January 2023–September 2024 and informed by information power. Data were thematically analysed by a multidisciplinary team.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>SUs and carers expressed their desire to be actively involved in EIP discharge planning and decision-making. They contrasted close relationships with EIP practitioners with inaccessibility of care and difficulties navigating healthcare systems after discharge. Some SUs described feelings of abandonment and expressed a wish for transitional support, and proactive, relationship-based care post-discharge. Carers played an important role as patient advocates but were rarely offered support themselves.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Improved collaboration is needed between SUs, carers and primary care/CMHT practitioners in the build-up to EIP discharge. There should be proactive contact from primary care at the point of discharge and in the early post-discharge period. Carer needs are often overlooked; primary care could utilise the ‘carers register’ and proactively offer support.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patient or Public Contribution</h3>\n \n <p>Patient and carer involvement and engagement was key to all stages of this study. The research team met regularly with our two co-investigators with lived experience (as a service user and a carer), who contributed to data analysis and writing this paper. We worked closely with our patient and carer advisory group, EXTEND-ing, throughout the research process. They helped formulate research questions, co-designed topic guides and participant information sheets, and contributed to data analysis and interpretation.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55070,"journal":{"name":"Health Expectations","volume":"28 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hex.70375","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Expectations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.70375","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) services in England offer up to 3 years' time-limited support to people experiencing early psychosis. Service users (SUs) are discharged to primary care, a community mental health team (CMHT), or other specialist mental health service. The aim of this study is to explore the SU and carer journey through discharge from EIP and into the early post-discharge period.

Methods

Qualitative longitudinal study comprising semi-structured interviews with SUs and carers at, or shortly after, discharge from EIP, and follow-up interviews with SUs 6-11 months later. Data collection conducted between January 2023–September 2024 and informed by information power. Data were thematically analysed by a multidisciplinary team.

Results

SUs and carers expressed their desire to be actively involved in EIP discharge planning and decision-making. They contrasted close relationships with EIP practitioners with inaccessibility of care and difficulties navigating healthcare systems after discharge. Some SUs described feelings of abandonment and expressed a wish for transitional support, and proactive, relationship-based care post-discharge. Carers played an important role as patient advocates but were rarely offered support themselves.

Conclusion

Improved collaboration is needed between SUs, carers and primary care/CMHT practitioners in the build-up to EIP discharge. There should be proactive contact from primary care at the point of discharge and in the early post-discharge period. Carer needs are often overlooked; primary care could utilise the ‘carers register’ and proactively offer support.

Patient or Public Contribution

Patient and carer involvement and engagement was key to all stages of this study. The research team met regularly with our two co-investigators with lived experience (as a service user and a carer), who contributed to data analysis and writing this paper. We worked closely with our patient and carer advisory group, EXTEND-ing, throughout the research process. They helped formulate research questions, co-designed topic guides and participant information sheets, and contributed to data analysis and interpretation.

从精神病服务的早期干预中导航出院:服务使用者和照护者经验的定性探索
英国精神病早期干预(EIP)服务为经历早期精神病的人提供长达3年的有限时间支持。服务使用者(SUs)出院后到初级保健、社区精神卫生小组(CMHT)或其他专业精神卫生服务机构。本研究的目的是探讨从EIP出院到出院后早期,学生和护理者之间的关系。方法定性纵向研究包括半结构化访谈,访谈对象为小学生和护理人员,访谈时间为小学生出院时或出院后不久,随访时间为6-11个月。数据收集时间为2023年1月至2024年9月,以信息力量为依据。一个多学科小组对数据进行了专题分析。结果住院医生和护理人员都表达了积极参与EIP出院计划和决策的意愿。他们对比了与EIP从业人员的密切关系,以及出院后难以获得护理和导航医疗保健系统的困难。一些SUs描述了被遗弃的感觉,并表达了对过渡支持的希望,以及出院后积极主动、以关系为基础的护理。护理人员作为病人的倡导者发挥了重要作用,但很少为他们自己提供支持。结论:在EIP出院的准备过程中,SUs、护理人员和初级保健/CMHT从业人员之间需要加强合作。在出院时和出院后早期,应与初级保健机构进行主动接触。照顾者的需求常常被忽视;初级保健可以利用“护理人员登记册”并主动提供支持。患者和护理人员的参与和参与是本研究所有阶段的关键。研究小组定期与我们的两位具有生活经验(作为服务用户和护理人员)的共同调查员会面,他们为数据分析和撰写本文做出了贡献。在整个研究过程中,我们与患者和护理人员咨询小组密切合作。他们帮助制定研究问题,共同设计主题指南和参与者信息表,并为数据分析和解释做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Expectations
Health Expectations 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.40%
发文量
251
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Expectations promotes critical thinking and informed debate about all aspects of patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) in health and social care, health policy and health services research including: • Person-centred care and quality improvement • Patients'' participation in decisions about disease prevention and management • Public perceptions of health services • Citizen involvement in health care policy making and priority-setting • Methods for monitoring and evaluating participation • Empowerment and consumerism • Patients'' role in safety and quality • Patient and public role in health services research • Co-production (researchers working with patients and the public) of research, health care and policy Health Expectations is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles and critical commentaries. It includes papers which clarify concepts, develop theories, and critically analyse and evaluate specific policies and practices. The Journal provides an inter-disciplinary and international forum in which researchers (including PPIE researchers) from a range of backgrounds and expertise can present their work to other researchers, policy-makers, health care professionals, managers, patients and consumer advocates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信