Environmental Social Governance (ESG) and Consumer Behavior: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda

IF 7.6 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Qin Lingda Tan, Sharizal Hashim, Nor Liza Abdullah, Hafizah Omar Zaki, Zhangwei Zheng
{"title":"Environmental Social Governance (ESG) and Consumer Behavior: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda","authors":"Qin Lingda Tan,&nbsp;Sharizal Hashim,&nbsp;Nor Liza Abdullah,&nbsp;Hafizah Omar Zaki,&nbsp;Zhangwei Zheng","doi":"10.1111/ijcs.70105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Although ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) practices are reshaping consumer expectations, existing research lacks an integrated understanding of how ESG factors influence consumer behavior. This study systematically reviews 56 empirical articles using the Theory–Context–Method (TCM) and Antecedent–Decision–Outcome (ADO) frameworks. The TCM analysis reveals theoretical fragmentation, a concentration of studies in East Asia, and a reliance on cross-sectional surveys and structural equation modeling. The ADO analysis identifies 189 antecedents, 52 decision variables, and 66 outcomes, with ESG-specific antecedents—such as perceived ESG performance, transparency, and greenwashing perception—exerting stronger and more consistent effects than general consumer factors. Moreover, cognitive and affective responses and purchase intentions are key mediators linking antecedents to diverse outcomes, while strategic decisions and long-term behavioral outcomes remain underexplored. Based on these findings, the study proposes a targeted research agenda to strengthen theory-driven modeling, extend contextual coverage beyond Asia, diversify methods, and address overlooked decision mechanisms and systemic outcomes. The review advances cumulative knowledge and offers actionable directions for researchers and practitioners working to align ESG strategies with consumer behavior.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48192,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Consumer Studies","volume":"49 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Consumer Studies","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijcs.70105","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) practices are reshaping consumer expectations, existing research lacks an integrated understanding of how ESG factors influence consumer behavior. This study systematically reviews 56 empirical articles using the Theory–Context–Method (TCM) and Antecedent–Decision–Outcome (ADO) frameworks. The TCM analysis reveals theoretical fragmentation, a concentration of studies in East Asia, and a reliance on cross-sectional surveys and structural equation modeling. The ADO analysis identifies 189 antecedents, 52 decision variables, and 66 outcomes, with ESG-specific antecedents—such as perceived ESG performance, transparency, and greenwashing perception—exerting stronger and more consistent effects than general consumer factors. Moreover, cognitive and affective responses and purchase intentions are key mediators linking antecedents to diverse outcomes, while strategic decisions and long-term behavioral outcomes remain underexplored. Based on these findings, the study proposes a targeted research agenda to strengthen theory-driven modeling, extend contextual coverage beyond Asia, diversify methods, and address overlooked decision mechanisms and systemic outcomes. The review advances cumulative knowledge and offers actionable directions for researchers and practitioners working to align ESG strategies with consumer behavior.

环境社会治理(ESG)与消费者行为:系统回顾与研究议程
虽然ESG(环境、社会和治理)实践正在重塑消费者的期望,但现有的研究缺乏对ESG因素如何影响消费者行为的综合理解。本研究使用理论-情境-方法(TCM)和先行-决策-结果(ADO)框架系统地回顾了56篇实证文章。中医分析揭示了理论的碎片化,东亚研究的集中,以及对横断面调查和结构方程模型的依赖。ADO分析确定了189个前因、52个决策变量和66个结果,其中ESG特定前因——如感知ESG绩效、透明度和洗绿感知——比一般消费者因素发挥更强、更一致的影响。此外,认知和情感反应和购买意图是连接前因与不同结果的关键中介,而战略决策和长期行为结果仍未得到充分研究。基于这些发现,本研究提出了一个有针对性的研究议程,以加强理论驱动的建模,将语境覆盖范围扩大到亚洲以外,使方法多样化,并解决被忽视的决策机制和系统性结果。该综述推进了累积知识,并为致力于将ESG战略与消费者行为相结合的研究人员和从业者提供了可操作的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
23.20%
发文量
119
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Consumer Studies is a scholarly platform for consumer research, welcoming academic and research papers across all realms of consumer studies. Our publication showcases articles of global interest, presenting cutting-edge research from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信