Cardiac arrest while using the toilet: not uncommon and associated with adverse resuscitation profile

IF 2.4 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Elizabeth D. Paratz , Carl Johann Hansen , Andre La Gerche , Dion Stub , Ziad Nehme , Ashanti Dantanarayana , Kelila Freedman , Andreas Pflaumer , Jodie Ingles , Bo Gregers Winkel , Jacob Tfelt-Hansen
{"title":"Cardiac arrest while using the toilet: not uncommon and associated with adverse resuscitation profile","authors":"Elizabeth D. Paratz ,&nbsp;Carl Johann Hansen ,&nbsp;Andre La Gerche ,&nbsp;Dion Stub ,&nbsp;Ziad Nehme ,&nbsp;Ashanti Dantanarayana ,&nbsp;Kelila Freedman ,&nbsp;Andreas Pflaumer ,&nbsp;Jodie Ingles ,&nbsp;Bo Gregers Winkel ,&nbsp;Jacob Tfelt-Hansen","doi":"10.1016/j.resplu.2025.101047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) on the toilet has been reported to be common and possibly driven by straining or vagal stimulus. Toilet-associated OHCA may also create a challenging resuscitation environment.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The national Danish sudden death registry and state-wide Australian End Unexplained Cardiac Death (EndUCD) registry were examined<strong>.</strong> Persons with a fatal OHCA aged 5–50 years with autopsy-confirmed cardiac or unascertained aetiology were included. Resuscitation-related, aetiological and forensic factors were compared between persons experiencing fatal toilet-associated OHCA versus elsewhere. A composite variable of physiological conditions creating pressure-load or pressure-sensitivity was created, comprising hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, aortic stenosis/coarctation, and aortic aneurysm/dissection.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 2,463young persons, 75 (3.0 %) experienced toilet-associated fatal OHCA while 2,388 (97.0 %) experienced out-of-toilet OHCA. Australians experienced toilet-associated OHCA 1.7 times more frequently than Danes (4.1 % vs 2.4 %, <em>p</em> = 0.016). Toilet-associated OHCA was less frequently witnessed (13.3 % vs 32.1 %, <em>p</em> = 0.001), with lower rates of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (32.0 % vs 55.7 %, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001) and shockable rhythm (5.9 % vs 23.8 %, <em>p</em> = 0.003) compared to non-toilet OHCA. Toxicological results were more frequently positive for illicit substances in toilet-associated OHCA (32.8 % vs 16.3 %, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001). No differences were identified in OHCA aetiology, including rates of the composite variable of aetiologies such as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and aortic dissection.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>3.0 % of young fatal OHCA of cardiac aetiology is toilet-associated, with almost double the rates of toilet-associated OHCA in Australia compared to Denmark. No differences in OHCA aetiology were identified in toilet-associated OHCA. Resuscitation-related factors were adverse in toilet-related OHCA, highlighting the need for innovative ways to recognise and respond to toilet-associated OHCA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94192,"journal":{"name":"Resuscitation plus","volume":"25 ","pages":"Article 101047"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resuscitation plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520425001845","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) on the toilet has been reported to be common and possibly driven by straining or vagal stimulus. Toilet-associated OHCA may also create a challenging resuscitation environment.

Methods

The national Danish sudden death registry and state-wide Australian End Unexplained Cardiac Death (EndUCD) registry were examined. Persons with a fatal OHCA aged 5–50 years with autopsy-confirmed cardiac or unascertained aetiology were included. Resuscitation-related, aetiological and forensic factors were compared between persons experiencing fatal toilet-associated OHCA versus elsewhere. A composite variable of physiological conditions creating pressure-load or pressure-sensitivity was created, comprising hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, aortic stenosis/coarctation, and aortic aneurysm/dissection.

Results

Of 2,463young persons, 75 (3.0 %) experienced toilet-associated fatal OHCA while 2,388 (97.0 %) experienced out-of-toilet OHCA. Australians experienced toilet-associated OHCA 1.7 times more frequently than Danes (4.1 % vs 2.4 %, p = 0.016). Toilet-associated OHCA was less frequently witnessed (13.3 % vs 32.1 %, p = 0.001), with lower rates of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (32.0 % vs 55.7 %, p < 0.0001) and shockable rhythm (5.9 % vs 23.8 %, p = 0.003) compared to non-toilet OHCA. Toxicological results were more frequently positive for illicit substances in toilet-associated OHCA (32.8 % vs 16.3 %, p < 0.0001). No differences were identified in OHCA aetiology, including rates of the composite variable of aetiologies such as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and aortic dissection.

Conclusion

3.0 % of young fatal OHCA of cardiac aetiology is toilet-associated, with almost double the rates of toilet-associated OHCA in Australia compared to Denmark. No differences in OHCA aetiology were identified in toilet-associated OHCA. Resuscitation-related factors were adverse in toilet-related OHCA, highlighting the need for innovative ways to recognise and respond to toilet-associated OHCA.
如厕时心脏骤停:并不罕见,且与不良复苏相关
据报道,院外如厕时心脏骤停(OHCA)很常见,可能是由紧张或迷走神经刺激引起的。与厕所相关的OHCA也可能创造一个具有挑战性的复苏环境。方法对丹麦国家猝死登记处和澳大利亚州级不明原因心源性死亡登记处(EndUCD)进行分析。死亡OHCA患者年龄在5-50岁,尸检证实为心脏或病因不明。在经历与厕所相关的致命OHCA的人与其他地方的人之间比较了与复苏相关的、病因学和法医因素。创建了产生压力负荷或压力敏感的生理条件的复合变量,包括肥厚性心肌病、主动脉狭窄/缩窄和主动脉瘤/夹层。结果2463名青少年中,75人(3.0%)经历过与厕所相关的致死性OHCA, 2388人(97.0%)经历过厕所外OHCA。澳大利亚人经历与厕所相关的OHCA的频率是丹麦人的1.7倍(4.1%对2.4%,p = 0.016)。与厕所相关的OHCA较少(13.3%比32.1%,p = 0.001),旁观者心肺复苏率较低(32.0%比55.7%,p <;0.0001)和震荡节律(5.9% vs 23.8%, p = 0.003)。毒理学结果显示,与厕所相关的OHCA中违禁物质呈阳性的比例更高(32.8% vs 16.3%, p <;0.0001)。两国的OHCA病因无明显差异,包括肥厚性心肌病和主动脉夹层等复合病因的发生率。结论3.0%的青少年致死性OHCA与厕所有关,澳大利亚与丹麦相比,厕所相关的OHCA发生率几乎是丹麦的两倍。在厕所相关的OHCA中,没有发现病因上的差异。与复苏相关的因素在与厕所相关的OHCA中是不利的,强调需要创新的方法来识别和应对与厕所相关的OHCA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Resuscitation plus
Resuscitation plus Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
52 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信