JMIP 2 Part 1: Technology uncertainty and robustness in Japan’s net-zero pathways

IF 5.6 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Masahiro Sugiyama , Hiroto Shiraki , Shinichiro Fujimori , Kenichi Wada , Tao CAO , Eamon Frazer , Hiroshi Hamasaki , Etsushi Kato , Yuhji Matsuo , Osamu Nishiura , Tatsuya Okubo , Ken Oshiro , Takashi Otsuki , Fuminori Sano , Hiroki Yoshida
{"title":"JMIP 2 Part 1: Technology uncertainty and robustness in Japan’s net-zero pathways","authors":"Masahiro Sugiyama ,&nbsp;Hiroto Shiraki ,&nbsp;Shinichiro Fujimori ,&nbsp;Kenichi Wada ,&nbsp;Tao CAO ,&nbsp;Eamon Frazer ,&nbsp;Hiroshi Hamasaki ,&nbsp;Etsushi Kato ,&nbsp;Yuhji Matsuo ,&nbsp;Osamu Nishiura ,&nbsp;Tatsuya Okubo ,&nbsp;Ken Oshiro ,&nbsp;Takashi Otsuki ,&nbsp;Fuminori Sano ,&nbsp;Hiroki Yoshida","doi":"10.1016/j.egycc.2025.100210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Japan’s commitment to reach net-zero 2050 hinges on innovation in emerging, uncertain technologies. Yet, no study has systematically examined uncertainties in technology development for Japan’s net-zero goal in a multi-model framework. Here, we close this research gap by presenting the results of the Japan Model Intercomparison Project (JMIP) 2. Across models and technology scenarios with wide spreads in costs of emerging technologies, we consistently identify the following robust strategies for net zero: (1) reducing unabated fossil fuels, (2) improving economy-wide energy efficiency, (3) decarbonizing the power sector, and (4) deploying carbon dioxide removal. We also find that although the expansion of variable renewable energy and end-use electrification is robust, the precise level in 2050 remains uncertain. Using technology sensitivity scenarios, we show that the marginal cost of abatement (or carbon price) is significantly affected by the availability of carbon removal. Affordability of hydrogen and ammonia imports significantly affects primary energy supply in some models, underscoring a policy architecture that can flexibly adapt as the techno-economic landscape evolves.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72914,"journal":{"name":"Energy and climate change","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100210"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy and climate change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666278725000376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Japan’s commitment to reach net-zero 2050 hinges on innovation in emerging, uncertain technologies. Yet, no study has systematically examined uncertainties in technology development for Japan’s net-zero goal in a multi-model framework. Here, we close this research gap by presenting the results of the Japan Model Intercomparison Project (JMIP) 2. Across models and technology scenarios with wide spreads in costs of emerging technologies, we consistently identify the following robust strategies for net zero: (1) reducing unabated fossil fuels, (2) improving economy-wide energy efficiency, (3) decarbonizing the power sector, and (4) deploying carbon dioxide removal. We also find that although the expansion of variable renewable energy and end-use electrification is robust, the precise level in 2050 remains uncertain. Using technology sensitivity scenarios, we show that the marginal cost of abatement (or carbon price) is significantly affected by the availability of carbon removal. Affordability of hydrogen and ammonia imports significantly affects primary energy supply in some models, underscoring a policy architecture that can flexibly adapt as the techno-economic landscape evolves.
JMIP 2第1部分:日本净零路径中的技术不确定性和稳健性
日本在2050年实现净零排放的承诺取决于新兴、不确定技术的创新。然而,目前还没有研究在多模型框架下系统地考察日本净零目标技术发展的不确定性。在这里,我们通过介绍日本模型比较项目(JMIP) 2的结果来缩小这一研究差距。在新兴技术成本广泛分布的模型和技术方案中,我们一致确定了以下稳健的净零战略:(1)减少未减少的化石燃料,(2)提高整个经济的能源效率,(3)使电力部门脱碳,以及(4)部署二氧化碳去除。我们还发现,尽管可变可再生能源和终端电气化的扩张势头强劲,但2050年的确切水平仍不确定。利用技术敏感性情景,我们发现减排的边际成本(或碳价格)受到碳去除可得性的显著影响。在某些模式下,氢和氨进口的可负担性对一次能源供应产生重大影响,这强调了可以随着技术经济格局的演变而灵活适应的政策架构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy and climate change
Energy and climate change Global and Planetary Change, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信